유리피판을 이용한 두경부 재건에 사용된 수혜부 혈관 분석
Analysis of Recipient Vessel for Microvascular Reconstruction of the Head and Neck
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Background and ObjectivesZZThe aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the free flap compromise and the choice of recipient vessels, the method of venous anastomosis,the use of an interposition vein graft, and the number of venous anastomosis for microvascular anastomosis. Subjects and MethodZZA retrospective review was carried out for 237 patients who underwent 247 microvascular free flap reconstructions after head and neck ablative surgery from October 1993 to July 2009. Flap donor sites included the radial forearm (n=187), anterolateral thigh (n=34), rectus abdominis (n=11), fibula (n=8), and lateral thigh (n=7). ResultsZZThe frequently used recipient artery included facial (66.4%), superior thyroid (17.8%),lingual (8.1%), transverse cervical (6.9%), and external carotid (0.8%). The recipient vein included facial (43.7%), external jugular (39.3%), superior thyroid (5.8%), anterior jugular (1.7%), and transverse cervical (0.7%). End-to-end venous anastomoses were completed in 230flaps and end-to-side anastomoses in 14 flaps. Three patients had one end-to-end and one endto-side anastomoses. The interposition vein grafts were used in 3 cases. Dual venous anastomoses were performed in 48 cases and single anastomosis in 199 cases. Twenty-one (8.5%) cases of free flap compromise due to vascular obstruction were identified and 11 flaps were lost (4.5%)with an overall success rate of 95.5%. There was no relationship between free flap compromise and the choice of recipient artery (p=0.360) or vein (p=0.125), the method of venous anastomosis (p=0.683), the use of an interposition vein graft (p=0.595), and the number of venous anastomosis (p=0.076). ConclusionZZAll vessels in the head and neck are potentially suitable for microvascular anastomoses. Flap compromise was not related to the method of venous anastomosis, the interposition vein graft or the number of venous anastomosis. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2010;53:20-3
Abstract
Background and ObjectivesZZThe aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the free flap compromise and the choice of recipient vessels, the method of venous anastomosis,the use of an interposition vein graft, and the number of venous anastomosis for microvascular anastomosis. Subjects and MethodZZA retrospective review was carried out for 237 patients who underwent 247 microvascular free flap reconstructions after head and neck ablative surgery from October 1993 to July 2009. Flap donor sites included the radial forearm (n=187), anterolateral thigh (n=34), rectus abdominis (n=11), fibula (n=8), and lateral thigh (n=7). ResultsZZThe frequently used recipient artery included facial (66.4%), superior thyroid (17.8%),lingual (8.1%), transverse cervical (6.9%), and external carotid (0.8%). The recipient vein included facial (43.7%), external jugular (39.3%), superior thyroid (5.8%), anterior jugular (1.7%), and transverse cervical (0.7%). End-to-end venous anastomoses were completed in 230flaps and end-to-side anastomoses in 14 flaps. Three patients had one end-to-end and one endto-side anastomoses. The interposition vein grafts were used in 3 cases. Dual venous anastomoses were performed in 48 cases and single anastomosis in 199 cases. Twenty-one (8.5%) cases of free flap compromise due to vascular obstruction were identified and 11 flaps were lost (4.5%)with an overall success rate of 95.5%. There was no relationship between free flap compromise and the choice of recipient artery (p=0.360) or vein (p=0.125), the method of venous anastomosis (p=0.683), the use of an interposition vein graft (p=0.595), and the number of venous anastomosis (p=0.076). ConclusionZZAll vessels in the head and neck are potentially suitable for microvascular anastomoses. Flap compromise was not related to the method of venous anastomosis, the interposition vein graft or the number of venous anastomosis. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2010;53:20-3
참고문헌 (16)
- Godina M, "Early microsurgical reconstruction of complex trauma of the extremities", Plast Reconstr Surg, 78(3), pp.285~292 (1986)
- Khouri RK, "Reconstruction of the lower extremity with microvascular free flaps: a 10-year experience with 304 consecutive cases", J Trauma, 29(8), pp.1086~1094 (1989)
- Khouri RK, "A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome", Plast Reconstr Surg, 102(3), pp.711~721 (1998)
- Khouri RK, "Avoiding free flap failure", Clin Plast Surg, 19(4), pp.773~781 (1992)
- Kanoh N, "Parameters for the preoperative evaluation of arteriosclerosis for free flap transfers in head and neck surgery", Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci, 25(2), pp.135~138 (2000)
- Nagler RM, "Spiral CT angiography: an alternative vascular evaluation technique for head and neck microvascular reconstruction", Plast Reconstr Surg, 100(7), pp.1697~1701 (1997)
- Harris JR, "Effect of diameter of microvascular interposition vein grafts on vessel patency and free flap survival in the rat model", J Otolaryngol, 28(3), pp.152~157 (1999)
- Yamamoto Y, "Superiority of end-to-side anastomosis with the internal jugular vein: the experience of 80 cases in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction", Br J Plast Surg, 52(2), pp.88~91 (1999)
- Ueda K, "Comparison of end-to-end and end-to-side venous anastomosis in free-tissue transfer following resection of head and neck tumors", Microsurgery, 17(3), pp.146~149 (1996)
- DeLacure MD, "Clinical experience in end to side venous anastomoses with a microvascular anastomotic coupling device in head and neck reconstruction", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 125(8), pp.869~872 (1999)
- Fillinger MF, "Does the end-to-end venous anastomosis offer a functional advantage over the end-to-side venous anastomosis in high-output arteriovenous grafts?", J Vasc Surg, 12(6), pp.676~688 (1990)
- Miller MJ, "Interposition vein grafting in head and neck reconstructive microsurgery", J Reconstr Microsurg, 9, pp.245~252 (1993)
- German G, "The clinical reliability of vein grafts in free flap transfer", J Reconstr Microsurg, 12, pp.11~18 (1996)
- Futran ND, "Single versus dual venous drainage of the radial forearm free flap", Am J Otolaryngol, 17(2), pp.112~117 (1996)
- Ichinose A, "Do multiple venous anastomoses reduce risk of thrombosis in free-flap transfer? Efficacy of dual anastomoses of separate venous systems", Ann Plast Surg, 52(1), pp.61~63 (2004)
- Alan Turner MJ, "Double venous anastomosis for the radial artery forearm flap. Improving success and minimising morbidity", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 37(5), pp.253~257 (2009)