인후두 역류질환에서 24시간 이중 탐침 산도 검사와 Reflux Finding Score, Reflux Symptom Index의 연관성
Correlation between Ambulatory 24 Hour Dual Probe pH Monitoring and Reflux Finding Score, Reflux Symptom Index in the Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background and Objectives A 24-hour ambulatory dual probe for pH monitoring is the most specific and sensitive test for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) disease. However, the use of this probe is not well tolerated in some patients due to discomfort and the invasive nature of the procedure. Thus, the diagnosis of LPR is usually made according to symptomatic responses to empirical treatment using a proton-pump inhibitor for patients with high score of reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS). The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the RSI and RFS and pH monitoring using a 24-hour ambulatory dual probe, and determine the role of RSI and RFS in the diagnosis of LPR. Subjects and Method We studied 100 patients who underwent pH monitoring using a 24-hour dual probe because of laryngopharyngeal reflux related symptoms or laryngoscopic findings. The various parameters of the 24-hour dual probe pH monitoring were compared with the scores of RSI and RFS. Results In 24-hour dual probe pH monitoring, 64 of 100 patients tested positive for LPR. The mean of RSI score was significantly higher in the positive LPR group than in the negative group. However, RFS did not differ between the two groups. RSI scores were significantly associated with the reflux number in the upright position of the 24-hour dual probe pH monitoring. There was no correlation between RFS and the parameters of the 24-hour dual probe pH monitoring. Conclusion RSI can be a reliable diagnostic tool for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease instead of the 24-hour ambulatory dual probe pH monitoring.
Abstract
Background and Objectives A 24-hour ambulatory dual probe for pH monitoring is the most specific and sensitive test for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) disease. However, the use of this probe is not well tolerated in some patients due to discomfort and the invasive nature of the procedure. Thus, the diagnosis of LPR is usually made according to symptomatic responses to empirical treatment using a proton-pump inhibitor for patients with high score of reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS). The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the RSI and RFS and pH monitoring using a 24-hour ambulatory dual probe, and determine the role of RSI and RFS in the diagnosis of LPR. Subjects and Method We studied 100 patients who underwent pH monitoring using a 24-hour dual probe because of laryngopharyngeal reflux related symptoms or laryngoscopic findings. The various parameters of the 24-hour dual probe pH monitoring were compared with the scores of RSI and RFS. Results In 24-hour dual probe pH monitoring, 64 of 100 patients tested positive for LPR. The mean of RSI score was significantly higher in the positive LPR group than in the negative group. However, RFS did not differ between the two groups. RSI scores were significantly associated with the reflux number in the upright position of the 24-hour dual probe pH monitoring. There was no correlation between RFS and the parameters of the 24-hour dual probe pH monitoring. Conclusion RSI can be a reliable diagnostic tool for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease instead of the 24-hour ambulatory dual probe pH monitoring.
참고문헌 (19)
- Vaezi MF, "Laryngeal signs and symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a critical assessment of cause and effect association", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 1(5), pp.333~344 (2003)
- Shin KS, "The role of psychological distress in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: a prospective questionnaire study", Clin Otolaryngol, 35(1), pp.25~30 (2010)
- 태경, "인후두역류증의 진단：식도점막 생검의 의의", 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학, 49(1), pp.79~84 (2006), 대한이비인후과학회
- Jin bJ, "Change of acoustic parameters before and after treatment in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients", Laryngoscope, 118(5), pp.938~941 (2008)
- Johnson LF, "Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux", Am J Gastroenterol, 62(4), pp.325~332 (1974)
- Ossakow SJ, "Esophageal reflux and dysmotility as the basis for persistent cervical symptoms", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 96(4), pp.387~392 (1987)
- Hickson C, "Laryngeal pseudosulcus as a predictor of laryngopharyngeal reflux", Laryngoscope, 111(10), pp.1742~1745 (2001)
- Chung JH, "The significance of laryngopharyngeal reflux in benign vocal mucosal lesions", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 141(3), pp.369~373 (2009)
- 정영호, "건강검진 수진자들에서의 역류성 인후두염의 증상지수 및소견점수의 분포 양상과 위내시경 소견과의 연관성 분석", 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학, 50(5), pp.431~437 (2007), 대한이비인후과학회
- Belafsky PC, "Symptoms and findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux", Ear Nose Throat J, 81(9 Suppl 2), pp.10~13 (2002)
- Belafsky PC, "The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS)", Laryngoscope, 111(8), pp.1313~1317 (2001)
- Belafsky PC, "Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI)", J Voice, 16(2), pp.274~277 (2002)
- Jacob P, "Proximal esophageal pH-metry in patients with ‘reflux laryngitis’", Gastroenterology, 100(2), pp.305~310 (1991)
- Cool M, "Characteristics and clinical relevance of proximal esophageal pH monitoring", Am J Gastroenterol, 99(12), pp.2317~2323 (2004)
- Hirano I, "ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing", Am J Gastroenterol, 102(3), pp.668~685 (2007)
- Vaezi MF, "Treatment of chronic posterior laryngitis with esomeprazole", Laryngoscope, 116(2), pp.254~260 (2006)
- Reichel O, "Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with esomeprazole for symptoms and signs associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 139(3), pp.414~420 (2008)
- Friedman M, "The value of routine pH monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 146(6), pp.952~958 (2012)
- Powell J, "Mucosal changes in laryngopharyngeal reflux-- prevalence, sensitivity, specificity and assessment", Laryngoscope, 123(4), pp.985~991 (2013)