본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전음성 난청 환자에서 내시경을 이용한 시험적 고실개방술의 유용성

The Efficacy of Endoscopic Exploratory Tympanotomy in Conductive Hearing Loss Patients

3

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

Background and Objectives The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the endoscopic exclusive transcanalar approach for the management of conductive hearing loss. Subjects and Method This was a retrospective comparative study of 106 patients who underwent exploratory tympanotomy at Chonnam National University Hospital from January 2008 to March 2016. The subjects were classified into two groups; endoscopic tympanotomy (ET, n=26) and microscopic tympanotomy (MT, n=80). Demographic data, operation time, postoperative admission days, pure tone audiometric results of pre-operation and post-operation at 3 months, and hearing success rate were evaluated. Results The mean operation time of MT (101.7±24.8 minutes) was longer than that of ET (59.8±23.2 minutes) with a statistical significance (p<0.01). The mean postoperative admission days of MT (4.4±1.3) was longer than that of ET (2.0±0.6) with a statistical significance (p<0.01). Hearing gain (air-conduction) and air-bone gap improvements were not significantly different between the groups. However, the hearing success rate of ET [partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP) 85.7%, total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) 81.8%] was significantly improved enormously compared to that of MT (PORP 62.9%, TORP 64.3%). Conclusion With regards to conductive hearing loss, the endoscopic approach provided a better surgical view and less invasiveness compared with the microscopic approach. In conclusion, endoscopic exploratory tympanotomy had several advantages in operation time, admission days and hearing success rate. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2017;60(1):7-12

Abstract

Background and Objectives The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the endoscopic exclusive transcanalar approach for the management of conductive hearing loss. Subjects and Method This was a retrospective comparative study of 106 patients who underwent exploratory tympanotomy at Chonnam National University Hospital from January 2008 to March 2016. The subjects were classified into two groups; endoscopic tympanotomy (ET, n=26) and microscopic tympanotomy (MT, n=80). Demographic data, operation time, postoperative admission days, pure tone audiometric results of pre-operation and post-operation at 3 months, and hearing success rate were evaluated. Results The mean operation time of MT (101.7±24.8 minutes) was longer than that of ET (59.8±23.2 minutes) with a statistical significance (p<0.01). The mean postoperative admission days of MT (4.4±1.3) was longer than that of ET (2.0±0.6) with a statistical significance (p<0.01). Hearing gain (air-conduction) and air-bone gap improvements were not significantly different between the groups. However, the hearing success rate of ET [partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP) 85.7%, total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) 81.8%] was significantly improved enormously compared to that of MT (PORP 62.9%, TORP 64.3%). Conclusion With regards to conductive hearing loss, the endoscopic approach provided a better surgical view and less invasiveness compared with the microscopic approach. In conclusion, endoscopic exploratory tympanotomy had several advantages in operation time, admission days and hearing success rate. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2017;60(1):7-12

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Huang TY, "A comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic approach type 1 tympanoplasty for simple chronic otitis media", J Int Adv Otol, 12(1), pp.28~31 (2016)
  2. Nassif N, "Tympanic membrane perforation in children: endoscopic type I tympanoplasty, a newly technique, is it worthwhile?", Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 79(11), pp.1860~1864 (2015)
  3. Özgür A, "Endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media", J Laryngol Otol, 129(11), pp.1073~1077 (2015)
  4. Hiraumi H, "A minimally invasive approach for cochlear implantation using a microendoscope", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 270(2), pp.477~481 (2013)
  5. Kozin ED, "Systematic review of outcomes following observational and operative endoscopic middle ear surgery", Laryngoscope, 125(5), pp.1205~1214 (2015)
  6. Sohn SJ, "Endoscopic tympanoplasty", Korean J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg, 43(6), pp.598~603 (2000)
  7. 김형종, "만성중이염 수술의 분류와 결과보고의 표준지침", 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학, 49(1), pp.2~6 (2006), 대한이비인후과학회
  8. Badr-el-Dine M, "Value of ear endoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery", Otol Neurotol, 23(5), pp.631~635 (2002)
  9. Thomassin JM, "Endoscopic-guided otosurgery in the prevention of residual cholesteatomas", Laryngoscope, 103(8), pp.939~943 (1993)
  10. Marchioni D, "From external to internal auditory canal:surgical anatomy by an exclusive endoscopic approach", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 270(4), pp.1267~1275 (2013)
  11. Kojima H, "Comparison between endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery", Laryngoscope, 124(1), pp.266~271 (2014)
  12. 최나연, "Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 10(1), pp.44~49 (2017), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  13. Khan MM, "Endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty: a twohanded technique using an endoscope holder", Laryngoscope, 126(8), pp.1893~1898 (2016)
  14. Khan MM, "Novel concept of attaching endoscope holder to microscope for two handed endoscopic tympanoplasty", Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 68(2), pp.230~240 (2016)
  15. Rehl RM, "Tympanomastoidectomy with otoendoscopy", Ear Nose Throat J, 91(12), pp.527~532 (2012)
  16. Kozin ED, "Thermal effects of endoscopy in a human temporal bone model: implications for endoscopic ear surgery", Laryngoscope, 124(8), pp.E332~E339 (2014)
  17. Shah PV, "Prolonged radiant exposure of the middle ear during transcanal endoscopic ear surgery", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 153(1), pp.102~104 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

시험적 고실개방술의 임상 및 내시경의 의의김석현, 이일우, 이현민, 정재환대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2015 · 제26권 제2호내시경을 이용한 이소골성형술의 기능적 결과 및 학습곡선안유영, 이민기, 이세아, 이영정, 이정현, 이종대대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2022 · 제65권 제11호Comparison of Grafting Success Rate and Hearing Outcomes between Endoscopic and Retro-Aural Approach (Tympanoplasty Type I)공수근, 나한슬, 오세준, 이석환, 조영진, 최성원대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2020 · 제31권 제2호내시경 귀 수술의 안전성 및 유효성: 체계적 문헌고찰김석현, 김장락, 오승하, 이병돈, 임기정, 전미혜, 정서강, 최진욱대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2019 · 제62권 제7호Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty노양섭, 문일준, 박우리, 욱선현, 이정주, 정원호, 조양선, 최나연, 최지은, 홍성화대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2017 · 제10권 제1호최소 침습 내시경 접근을 통한 상고실 진주종의 치료김병길, 김희정, 문일준, 최지은대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2017 · 제60권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)