본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

진행된 구인두암에서 수술 기반 치료의 효과

The Effectiveness of Surgery-Based Treatment in Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancers

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

Background and Objectives Oropharyngeal cancers (OPCs) can be staged down to a lowerstage with p16 positivity and de-escalated therapy has been the common practice. The aim ofthis study is to evaluate the survival outcomes based on various clinical factors in advancedOPC patients. Subjects and Method A total of 58 OPC patients in the stage IVA based on the AmericanJoint Committee on Cancer 7th edition were treated with primary surgery or primary chemoradiationtherapy from 2010 to 2016. A survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model. Results The median follow-up was 39.5 months. Thirty-eight and 20 patients received surgery-based and radiation therapy (RT)-based treatments, respectively. Clinical T-stage and treatmentmethod were significant risk factors for 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and thetreatment method was the only significant risk factor for overall-survival (OS) rate. 5-year DFSrate in the surgery-based treatment and RT-based treatment was 76.1% and 36.0% (p=0.001). On multivariate analysis, the surgery-based treatment group was associated with a significantlyreduced hazard of death [the hazard ratio (HR) for the radiation-based treatment was 6.565compared to the surgery-based treatment, p=0.002]. 5-year OS rate in the surgery-based treatmentand RT-based treatment was 91.1% and 53.4% (p=0.003), respectively. On the multivariateanalysis, the surgery-based treatment group was associated with a significantly reducedhazard of death (the HR for the radiation-based treatment was 7.544 compared to the surgerybasedtreatment, p=0.012). Conclusion The primary surgery-based treatment for advanced OPC showed a better survivaloutcome than the primary radiation-based treatment, irrespective of p16 positivity.

Abstract

Background and Objectives Oropharyngeal cancers (OPCs) can be staged down to a lowerstage with p16 positivity and de-escalated therapy has been the common practice. The aim ofthis study is to evaluate the survival outcomes based on various clinical factors in advancedOPC patients. Subjects and Method A total of 58 OPC patients in the stage IVA based on the AmericanJoint Committee on Cancer 7th edition were treated with primary surgery or primary chemoradiationtherapy from 2010 to 2016. A survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model. Results The median follow-up was 39.5 months. Thirty-eight and 20 patients received surgery-based and radiation therapy (RT)-based treatments, respectively. Clinical T-stage and treatmentmethod were significant risk factors for 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and thetreatment method was the only significant risk factor for overall-survival (OS) rate. 5-year DFSrate in the surgery-based treatment and RT-based treatment was 76.1% and 36.0% (p=0.001). On multivariate analysis, the surgery-based treatment group was associated with a significantlyreduced hazard of death [the hazard ratio (HR) for the radiation-based treatment was 6.565compared to the surgery-based treatment, p=0.002]. 5-year OS rate in the surgery-based treatmentand RT-based treatment was 91.1% and 53.4% (p=0.003), respectively. On the multivariateanalysis, the surgery-based treatment group was associated with a significantly reducedhazard of death (the HR for the radiation-based treatment was 7.544 compared to the surgerybasedtreatment, p=0.012). Conclusion The primary surgery-based treatment for advanced OPC showed a better survivaloutcome than the primary radiation-based treatment, irrespective of p16 positivity.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Siegel RL, "Cancer statistics, 2016", CA Cancer J Clin, 66(1), pp.7~30 (2016)
  2. Pytynia KB, "Epidemiology of HPVassociated oropharyngeal cancer", Oral Oncol, 50(5), pp.380~386 (2014)
  3. Pfister DG, "Head and neck cancers, version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in oncology", J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 18(7), pp.873~898 (2020)
  4. Parsons JT, "Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx:Surgery, radiation therapy, or both", Cancer, 94(11), pp.2967~2980 (2002)
  5. Allal AS, "Quality of life in patients with oropharynx carcinomas : Assessment after accelerated radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy versus radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy", Head Neck, 25(10), pp.833~839 (2003)
  6. Garden AS, "Outcomes and patterns of care of patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma treated in the early 21st century", Radiat Oncol, 8, pp.21~ (2013)
  7. Boscolo-Rizzo P, "Long-term quality of life after treatment for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma : Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiation", Oral Oncol, 45(11), pp.953~957 (2009)
  8. Kamran SC, "Primary surgery versus primary radiation-based treatment for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer", Laryngoscope, 128(6), pp.1353~1364 (2018)
  9. Dong Y, "Long-term toxicities in 10-year survivors of radiation treatment for head and neck cancer", Oral Oncol, 71, pp.122~128 (2017)
  10. Iyer NG, "Randomized trial comparing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced, nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 10-year update and subset analysis", Cancer, 121(10), pp.1599~1607 (2015)
  11. 강영, "구인두암에서 초치료에 따른 생존 분석", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 62(1), pp.49~56 (2019), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)