남용익 문학론 補遺–壺谷漫筆과 詩話叢林 內 壺谷詩話의 대비를 중심으로–

Abstract

This paper was written to derive the missing contents in Hogok-Sihwa(壺谷詩話) and to present views and attitudes on literature of Nam Yong-Ik(南龍翼, 1628-1692). The way is the contrast between Hogok-Sihwa in the Sihwa-Chonglim(詩話叢林) and Hogok-Manpil(壺谷漫筆). Although the issue of ‘Is there a unique literary theory of an individual writer?’ requires careful consideration, Nam Yong-ik’s literary criticism and poetry have been submitted and accepted in the category of ‘literary theory’. Nam Yong-ik is one of the recognized literary figures representing the 17th century in name and reality. However, the research category of ‘Literary Theory’ resulted in a somewhat overlooked aspect of Nam Yong-ik’s actual attitude toward his works and writers. In order to understand his actual appearance as a literary artist, it is necessary to find out what kind of views and attitudes Yong-Ik Nam has toward writers, works, and paragraphs. In the meantime, most of the research on Nam Yong-Ik has been done through the summary version Sihwa- Chonglim. So, there are some unknowns about him. Nam Yong-Ik highly valued literature related to diplomacy, had an attitude to tailor his own country's literature, and was highly interested in Lim Sook-Young(任叔英). He also described the history of Chinese literature based on a historical perspective on literature, and presented an example of writing poetry based on this. Spring, autumn, moon, and alcohol, which frequently appear in the examples, also appear in a significant number of Chinese poems in Hogok-Jip(壺谷集), so it can be inferred that the presentation of the examples and the his poetry are related. It is expected that the facts derived from the above can be used meaningfully to some extent not only from the point of view of the author's theory, but also from the point of view of the actual analysis of Nam Yong-Ik's poetry.