본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

법인의 형사책임 - 양벌규정의 법인면책사유로서 ‘상당한 주의와 감독’의 판단기준-

the Criminal responsibility of Corporation - A judgement standard of the considerable caution and supervision on the obligation exemption of the penalty against employer and employee -

1

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This thesis sees the legal nature of the existing corporation punishment regulations as the negligence responsibility, and studied a judgment standard to judge the considerable caution and supervision of a corporate. First, I studied the legal nature of the existing corporation punishment regulations as the negligence responsibility, and maintained the negligence responsibility. Moreover, I suggested that the necessity of a concrete and definite formal standard in order to judge the considerable caution and supervision of the penalty against employer and employee. In sequence, I studied a judicial precedent of a judgment standard of the considerable caution and supervision consequently,knowed that the court simply acknowledges a case because there is a 'compliance education' as a judgemental component, and, on the contrary, does not acknowledge a case because a corporate did not practically observes the illegal activities of employees. However, I could say that, in this case, it does not seem to be reasonable that a monthly education is regarded as a judgmental indexed, and so this is not an appropriate judgment. Therefore I suggest the corporate compliance program which is developed in the U.S. and worked as a rule of criminal case.―The program is also used in Korea as a judgmental standard that is to lay a fine when a company breaks a rule of fair trade of the business activity. Consequently, the corporation undertakes not a vicarious responsibility but the self-corporation's negligence responsibility,and so actually accomplish the responsibility principle in the criminal law in a criminal penalty toward the corporation.

Abstract

This thesis sees the legal nature of the existing corporation punishment regulations as the negligence responsibility, and studied a judgment standard to judge the considerable caution and supervision of a corporate. First, I studied the legal nature of the existing corporation punishment regulations as the negligence responsibility, and maintained the negligence responsibility. Moreover, I suggested that the necessity of a concrete and definite formal standard in order to judge the considerable caution and supervision of the penalty against employer and employee. In sequence, I studied a judicial precedent of a judgment standard of the considerable caution and supervision consequently,knowed that the court simply acknowledges a case because there is a 'compliance education' as a judgemental component, and, on the contrary, does not acknowledge a case because a corporate did not practically observes the illegal activities of employees. However, I could say that, in this case, it does not seem to be reasonable that a monthly education is regarded as a judgmental indexed, and so this is not an appropriate judgment. Therefore I suggest the corporate compliance program which is developed in the U.S. and worked as a rule of criminal case.―The program is also used in Korea as a judgmental standard that is to lay a fine when a company breaks a rule of fair trade of the business activity. Consequently, the corporation undertakes not a vicarious responsibility but the self-corporation's negligence responsibility,and so actually accomplish the responsibility principle in the criminal law in a criminal penalty toward the corporation.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김종수, "양벌규정" (1966), 법제
  2. 양벌규정에 관한 판례 분석, "박기석", 강의중교수정년기념논문집, ~ (2002)
  3. 박기석, "양벌규정의 문제점과 법인범죄의 새로운 구성", 형사정책, 10 (1998)
  4. 박기석, "법인범죄에 있어서 법인과 자연인행위자책임의 상호관계", 사회과학 연구, 9(1) (2001), 대구대학교
  5. 송기동, "영미 기업범죄 형사책임의 전개", 형사정책, 20(2), pp.41~70 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
  6. 법인범죄에 대한 효율적 제재방안, "이기헌", 형사정책연구원, ~ (1996)
  7. 이천현, "법인의 범죄주체능력과 형사책임", 형사법연구, 22 (2004)
  8. 정금천, "양벌규정과 법인의 형사책임-부속형법의 구성요건적 특징을 중심으 로-,in 志松이재상교수화갑기념논문집(Ⅰ)" (2003), 박영사
  9. 정성근, "법인의 범죄능력재론, in 한국형사법학의 새로운 지평", 유일당오선 주교수정년기념논문집 (2001)
  10. 조국, "법인의 형사책임과 양벌규정의 법적 성격", 서울대학교 법학, 48(3), pp.60~76 (2007), 법학연구소
  11. 조명화, "양벌규정과 형사책임 - 개정된 양벌규정의 문제점을 중심으로 -", 법학논총, 23, pp.279~302 (2010), 법학연구소
  12. 조병선, "양벌규정과 형사책임", 형사판례연구, 3 (1996), 형사판례연구회
  13. 조병선, "기업형사책임에 대한 비교법적 연구-특히 감독책임에 관한 독일과 일본의 판례에 대한 연구", 청대학술논집, 통권 : 4 (2004)
  14. 조병선, "한국의 행정법과 행정형법이론에 관한 비교법적 고찰, In 김종원교수화 갑기념논문집" (1994)
  15. 조병선, "개정양벌규정에서의 기업의 형사책임: 과실추정설에 대한 반론", 형사정책, 21(1), pp.351~370 (2009), 한국형사정책학회
  16. 공정거래자율준수프로그램의 도입을 위한 안내자료집, "공정거래위원회", ~ (2002)
  17. 川崎友巳, "企業の刑事責任" (2004), 成文堂
  18. 川崎友巳, "両罰規定における法人の刑事責任とコンプライアンス・プログラム", 同志社法学, 50(3) (1999)
  19. 鄕原信郞, "企業法とコンプライアンス(第4版)" (2008), 東洋経濟新聞社
  20. 三正 誠, "管理・監督過失をめぐる問題の所在-火災刑事事件を素材に", 刑法雜, 28(1) (1987), 日本刑事法學會
  21. 神例康博, "企業の刑事責任に關する法理について", 刑法雜誌, 36(2) (1997)
  22. Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines, "The Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines", ~ (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)