후이개 모발선 절개법과 V형 절개법을 이용한 이하선 절제술의 비교
Retroauricular Hairline Incision and V-Shaped Incision for Parotidectomy
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background and Objectives There have not been any studies that compared retroauricularhairline (RAH) and V-shaped incisions for parotidectomy. In this regard, we aimed to evaluatethe results of RAH and V-shaped incisions. Subjects and Method Between 2016 and 2019, 81 patients who underwent parotidectomyusing RAH (n=46) and V-shaped (n=35) incisions were included in this study. Patient characteristics,tumor profiles, surgical parameters, postoperative complications, and cosmetic resultswere assessed. Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-squared test were used to inspect differencesin continuous and categorical variables between the groups, respectively. Results In the RAH and V-shaped groups, the patient age was 52.7 and 42.1 years, respectively(p=0.002), and the tumour size was 2.7 and 1.8 cm, respectively (p<0.001). All parotidectomieswere successfully completed with no incision extension or major complications. Therewere no significant differences in surgical parameters and postoperative complications betweenthe two groups. The subjective scar satisfaction scores assessed at 3 months postoperatively were9.0 and 9.3 in the RAH and V-shaped groups, respectively (p=0.191). The scores of male patientswere 8.9 and 9.5 in the RAH and V-shaped groups, respectively, (p=0.026), while those of thefemale patients were 9.2 and 9.2, respectively (p=0.906). Conclusion The RAH and V-shaped incisions yields comparable surgical and cosmetic outcomes,with high patient satisfaction. For male patients, the use of V-shaped incision, if indicated,would provide higher scar satisfaction than the use of RAH incision.
Abstract
Background and Objectives There have not been any studies that compared retroauricularhairline (RAH) and V-shaped incisions for parotidectomy. In this regard, we aimed to evaluatethe results of RAH and V-shaped incisions. Subjects and Method Between 2016 and 2019, 81 patients who underwent parotidectomyusing RAH (n=46) and V-shaped (n=35) incisions were included in this study. Patient characteristics,tumor profiles, surgical parameters, postoperative complications, and cosmetic resultswere assessed. Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-squared test were used to inspect differencesin continuous and categorical variables between the groups, respectively. Results In the RAH and V-shaped groups, the patient age was 52.7 and 42.1 years, respectively(p=0.002), and the tumour size was 2.7 and 1.8 cm, respectively (p<0.001). All parotidectomieswere successfully completed with no incision extension or major complications. Therewere no significant differences in surgical parameters and postoperative complications betweenthe two groups. The subjective scar satisfaction scores assessed at 3 months postoperatively were9.0 and 9.3 in the RAH and V-shaped groups, respectively (p=0.191). The scores of male patientswere 8.9 and 9.5 in the RAH and V-shaped groups, respectively, (p=0.026), while those of thefemale patients were 9.2 and 9.2, respectively (p=0.906). Conclusion The RAH and V-shaped incisions yields comparable surgical and cosmetic outcomes,with high patient satisfaction. For male patients, the use of V-shaped incision, if indicated,would provide higher scar satisfaction than the use of RAH incision.
참고문헌 (18)
- Buchman C, "Pleomorphic adenoma : Effect of tumor spill and inadequate resection on tumor recurrence", Laryngoscope, 104(10), pp.1231~1234 (1994)
- Nouraei SA, "An anatomical comparison of Blair and facelift incisions for parotid surgery", Clin Otolaryngol, 31(6), pp.531~534 (2006)
- Laccourreye H, "Total conservative parotidectomy for primary benign pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland : A 25-year experience with 229 patients", Laryngoscope, 104(12), pp.1487~1494 (1994)
- 안동빈, "변형 Blair 절개법과 변형 안면거상 절개법 및 흉쇄유돌근피판을 이용한 이하선 절제술의 비교", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 58(1), pp.37~43 (2015), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
- Mantsopoulos K, "Evolution and changing trends in surgery for benign parotid tumors", Laryngoscope, 125(1), pp.122~127 (2015)
- Lohuis PJ, "Superficial parotidectomy via facelift incision", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 118(4), pp.276~280 (2009)
- Grover N, "Facelift approach for parotidectomy : An evolving aesthetic technique", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 148(4), pp.548~556 (2013)
- Ferreria JL, "Surgery of the parotid region : A new approach", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 48(8), pp.803~807 (1990)
- Appiani E, "Handling of a parotidectomy and muscular graft", Prensa Med Argent, 54(25), pp.1242~1243 (1967)
- Appiani E, "Plastic incisions for facial and neck tumors", Ann Plast Surg, 13(4), pp.335~352 (1984)
- Yuen AP, "Small access postaural parotidectomy: An analysis of techniques, feasibility and safety", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 273(7), pp.1879~1883 (2016)
- 김도윤, "Partial Superficial Parotidectomy via Retroauricular Hairline Incision", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 7(2), pp.119~122 (2014), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
- Ahn D, "Feasibility of a new V-shaped incision for parotidectomy : A preliminary report", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 56(5), pp.406~410 (2018)
- 곽지혜, "안면거상 절개법과 V형 절개법을 이용한 이하선 절제술의 비교", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 62(1), pp.43~48 (2019), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
- 정유진, "후이개 모발선 절개를 통한 부분 이하선 천엽 절제술", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 61(1), pp.42~46 (2018), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
- Jo MG, "A modified V-shaped incision combined with superficial musculo-aponeurotic system flap for parotidectomy", Acta Otolaryngol, 139(2), pp.178~183 (2019)
- 김무건, "이하선 절제술시 절개방법의 비교연구", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 58(5), pp.337~340 (2015), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
- Zhang Q, "Cosmetic approach selection in parotidectomy for benign parotid gland tumour according to its location", J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 73(5), pp.921~926 (2020)