본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

난청 환자에서 청성뇌간반응검사와 순음청력검사 간 주파수별 역치 차이 분석

Difference in Thresholds Between Auditory Brainstem Response Test and Pure Tone Audiometry by Frequency

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

Background and Objectives There is no clear standard for the difference in the thresholdsof auditory brainstem response (ABR) and pure tone audiometry (PTA) when using ABR toevaluate the reliability of PTA. Therefore, we assessed the difference in the thresholds of ABRand PTA for each frequency. Consequently, we present here the actual difference values betweenthe two tests that can be used as a reference in the clinic. Subjects and Method We retrospectively assessed the audiometry results of 129 ears. Earsin which the hearing thresholds of each frequency continuously declined were classified as thedownward group. We compared the average of differences between the two tests by frequency. The differences were compared for each hearing level from 50 dB or higher. Results For all ears, the appropriate range of difference value was ±5 dB at 2 kHz. At 1 kHz,the ABR threshold was 10 dB higher than PTA, and it was 10 dB less than PTA at 4 kHz. Inthe downward group, the difference value increased by 10 dB at 1 kHz and 4 kHz. In the subgroupsat each hearing level, the difference value showed similar results (p<0.05). Conclusion The difference in the threshold, regardless of the severity or tendency of hearingloss, was the smallest at 2 kHz and the range was ±5 dB. ABR was 10 dB higher at 1 kHz andand 10 dB lower at 4 kHz than PTA. In the downward group, the difference at 1 kHz and 4kHz increased by 10 dB each.

Abstract

Background and Objectives There is no clear standard for the difference in the thresholdsof auditory brainstem response (ABR) and pure tone audiometry (PTA) when using ABR toevaluate the reliability of PTA. Therefore, we assessed the difference in the thresholds of ABRand PTA for each frequency. Consequently, we present here the actual difference values betweenthe two tests that can be used as a reference in the clinic. Subjects and Method We retrospectively assessed the audiometry results of 129 ears. Earsin which the hearing thresholds of each frequency continuously declined were classified as thedownward group. We compared the average of differences between the two tests by frequency. The differences were compared for each hearing level from 50 dB or higher. Results For all ears, the appropriate range of difference value was ±5 dB at 2 kHz. At 1 kHz,the ABR threshold was 10 dB higher than PTA, and it was 10 dB less than PTA at 4 kHz. Inthe downward group, the difference value increased by 10 dB at 1 kHz and 4 kHz. In the subgroupsat each hearing level, the difference value showed similar results (p<0.05). Conclusion The difference in the threshold, regardless of the severity or tendency of hearingloss, was the smallest at 2 kHz and the range was ±5 dB. ABR was 10 dB higher at 1 kHz andand 10 dB lower at 4 kHz than PTA. In the downward group, the difference at 1 kHz and 4kHz increased by 10 dB each.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. Gorga MP, "Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram", Ear Hear, 6(2), pp.105~112 (1985)
  2. Bellman S, "A nine-year review of 841children tested by transtympanic electrocochleography", J Laryngol Otol, 98(1), pp.1~9 (1984)
  3. Hyde ML, "The Auditory Brainstem Response", pp.134~146 (1985), College Hill Press
  4. Jerger J, "Prediction of sensorineural hearing level from the brain stem evoked response", Arch Otolaryngol, 104(8), pp.456~461 (1978)
  5. 안용휘, "성인의 청력장애 판정에서 순음청력검사 및 청성뇌간반응과 청성지속반응의 상관관계 비교", 임상이비인후과, 28(2), pp.192~198 (2017), 대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회[DOI]
  6. Coats AC, "Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses : Effects of audiogram shape and lesion location", Arch Otolaryngol, 103(10), pp.605~622 (1977)
  7. van der Drift JF, "The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss", Audiology, 26(1), pp.1~10 (1987)
  8. Lee JS, "Comparison of pure-tone thresholds and click-evoked auditory brain stem response thresholds in noise-induced hearing loss", Korean J Audiol, 14(2), pp.110~114 (2010)
  9. 서재현, "클릭유발 청성뇌간반응과 순음청력검사의 평균 및 주파수에 따른 상관관계 분석", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 55(12), pp.764~770 (2012), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  10. Chien CH, "Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population", ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 70(6), pp.366~372 (2008)
  11. 박우길, "정상청력인 이명 환자에서의 청성뇌간반응 검사", 임상이비인후과, 26(2), pp.202~207 (2015), 대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회[DOI]
  12. 강민수, "일측 이명 환자에서의 청성뇌간반응 결과의 양이비교 분석", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 61(3), pp.127~132 (2018), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

성인의 청력장애 판정에서 순음청력검사 및 청성뇌간반응과 청성지속반응의 상관관계 비교김동현, 심현준, 안용휘, 오현식, 윤지은, 윤지향, 이은섭대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2017 · 제28권 제2호클릭유발 청성뇌간반응과 순음청력검사의 평균 및 주파수에 따른 상관관계 분석김동현, 김주은, 남인철, 박용수, 서재현, 이일환, 이호석, 전은주대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2012 · 제55권 제12호백색소음하 청성뇌간반응의 정상 결과의 분포김세아, 김여주, 유성화, 한우재대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2020 · 제63권 제1호부분적 전농 환자 선별을 위한 객관적 청각검사의 유용성강영숙, 문형아, 박헌이, 유민지, 이종주, 임혜진, 정연훈, 홍수아대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2015 · 제58권 제8호영아에서 연령, 청력역치, 자극 강도에 따른 청성뇌간반응 V파 잠복기 분석김영근, 윤영빈, 정성욱, 최아현대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2023 · 제66권 제6호국내 소아 및 성인에서의 순음청력검사와 청성안정유발반응의 상관관계 분석김홍찬, 박형주, 신동주, 장철호대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2015 · 제58권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)