상습범 가중처벌의 타당성 및 죄수판단에 대한 고찰
A Study on the Propriety of Aggravated Punishment and Judging Number of Crime in Habitual Offender
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
From mentioned-above, we contemplated about propriety of aggravated punishment on the habitual offender and judging number of crime in habitual offender. An my opinion about a provision of aggravated punishment on habitual offender can be summarized as follows. 1. Because there is no evidence that the punishment for habitual offender should be severely imposed than the punishment for normal crime in a point of view of a principle of liability, an aggravated punishment on habitual offender should be abrogated. However, antisocial and dangerous habitual criminals must be isolated in order to protect the public, and although the measurement of care and custody is required in order to help the habitual criminals to return to the society, it is proper to take the medical treatment and custody than the protective custody. 2. A habitual offender is either a comprehensive crime or several crimes. If the habitual offender qualifies requirements of a comprehensive crime, it is a comprehensive crime, and if it possesses essential conditions of substantive Konkurren, it becomes a substantive Konkurrenz, which is several crimes.
Abstract
From mentioned-above, we contemplated about propriety of aggravated punishment on the habitual offender and judging number of crime in habitual offender. An my opinion about a provision of aggravated punishment on habitual offender can be summarized as follows. 1. Because there is no evidence that the punishment for habitual offender should be severely imposed than the punishment for normal crime in a point of view of a principle of liability, an aggravated punishment on habitual offender should be abrogated. However, antisocial and dangerous habitual criminals must be isolated in order to protect the public, and although the measurement of care and custody is required in order to help the habitual criminals to return to the society, it is proper to take the medical treatment and custody than the protective custody. 2. A habitual offender is either a comprehensive crime or several crimes. If the habitual offender qualifies requirements of a comprehensive crime, it is a comprehensive crime, and if it possesses essential conditions of substantive Konkurren, it becomes a substantive Konkurrenz, which is several crimes.
참고문헌 (14)
- 김성돈, "집합범의 죄수" (1996), 경북대학교 법학논고
- 김인선, "형사정책적 관점에서의 책임주의와 보안처분의 관계에 관한 고찰", 교정연구, (14) (2002), 한국교정학회
- 김혜정, "인격(성격)장애로 인한 상습범죄자의 처우에 관한 검토", 형사저책연구, 16(1)통권 : 61 (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
- 박정근, "상습범의 형사책임, 인격책임의 신이론" (1986), 법문사
- 박정근, "상습범의 가중법정형폐지의 정당성(김종원교수 화갑기념논문집)" (1991)
- 송문호, "상습범과 누범의 대책에 관한 문제점 : 개별 예방적 관점에서의 근본적 재검토", 형사법연구, (16) (2001), 한국형사법학회
- 신영호, "누범과 상습범의 구별에 관한 비판적 고찰:부산법학", 부산법학연구회
- 원형식, "상습범과 누범의 가중처벌의 문제: 형사법연구" (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 윤동호, "형벌가중체계의 개선방안: 누범?상습범?경합범", 한국형사정책연구원
- 윤동호, "누범과 상습범의 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책연구, 17(4)통권 : 68 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 최병각, "상습범대책의 유형과 평가" (2000), 한국형사정책연구원
- 최병각, "상습범의 법제와 개선방향", 비교형사법연구, 3(2)통권 : 5 (2001), 한국비교형사법학회
- 최호진, "상습범의 상습성 판단자료와 죄수판단", 비교형사법연구, 7(1)통권 : 12 (2005), 한국비교형사법학회
- 한상훈, "형법 및 형사특별법상 재산범죄 가중처벌규정의 문제점과 개선방안-상습범, 누범 및 가중적 구성요건을 중심으로-", 형사법연구, (26) (2006), 한국형사법학회