본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해악원리, 법적 도덕주의, 그리고 후견주의 - 후견주의의 이중적 양면성 -

Harm Principle, Legal Moralism, and Paternalism - Dual Ambilaterality of Paternalism -

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

Liberalism and communitarianism are the main viewpoints of legal- and social philosophy that inquire into the nature and limits of legal exercise of state power. According to harm principle based on classical liberalism, liberty-limiting interference can be justified to protect a person from not self-regarding harm, but other-regarding harm. But, legal moralism based on communitarianism justifies liberty-limiting interference in order to protect a common morality itself as well as a person from harms. But, both of them have its own limitations in theory and practice. Paternalism is the most reasonable and plausible alternative to harm principle and legal moralism. It justifies interference with another for his own good. But, legal moralists argue against paternalism, while liberals who abhor moral legalism also criticise it. In a sense, paternalism contradicts harm principle on the one hand, legal moralism on the other hand. It paradoxically means that paternalism can be compatible with harm principle as well as legal moralism. Can paternalism really coexist with harm principle or legal moralism? Yes. The dual ambilaterality of paternalism makes it possible. The revelation of dual ambilaterality will be of use to the normative discussion of paternalism.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 오병선, "자유제한의 원리와 도덕의 법적 강제", 서강법학연구, 3 (2001)
  2. 오세혁, "법적 후견주의 ― 개념분석적 고찰 ―", 법철학연구, 12(1), pp.153~182 (2009), 한국법철학회
  3. 이영록, "유해성원칙·후견주의·자유주의", 비교형사법연구, 4(2), pp.2~48 (2002), 한국비교형사법학회
  4. 정규원, "피해자의 승낙에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1999
  5. 차용석, "윤리와의 관계에서의 형벌권의 한계", 법철학과 형법(석우황산덕 박사화갑기념논문집),, 301~331 (1979)
  6. 최봉철, "도덕의 법적 강제에 대한 논쟁과 헌법재판소의 결정", 성균관법학, 18(3), pp.661~698 (2006), 법학연구소
  7. 황경식, "자유와 간섭 - 자율성과 선의의 간섭주의-", 철학사상, (1) (1991)
  8. R.Arneson, "Paternalism, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy" (1998), Routledge
  9. J. Blumental, "Emotional Paternalism", Florida State Law Review, 35 (2007)
  10. J. Smart, "Utilitarianism, Encyclopedia of Philosophy" (2006), Thomson Gale
  11. P. Devlin, "The Enforcement of Morals" (1965), OUP
  12. G. Dworkin, "Moral Paternalism", Law and Philosophy, 24 (2005)
  13. G. Dworkin, "Morality, Harm and the Law" (1994), Westview
  14. J. Feinberg, "Social Philosophy" (1973), Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
  15. J. Feinberg, "The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law" (1988), OUP
  16. R. George, "Making Men Moral" (1993), OUP
  17. M. Golding, "Philosophy of Law" (1975), Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
  18. H.L.A. Hart, "Law, Liberty and Morality" (1963), OUP
  19. J. Kleinig, "Paternalism", Manchester: Manchester UP, ~ (1983)
  20. D. Liebs, "Lateinische Rechtsregeln und Rechtssprichwörter" (1982), C.H. Beck
  21. J.S. Mill, "자유론" (1992), 서광사
  22. S. Mulhall, "자유주의와 공동체주의" (2007), 한울아카데미
  23. R. Sartorius, "Paternalism" (1983), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
  24. D. Scoccia, "In Defense of Hard Paternalism", Law and Philosophy, 27 (2008)
  25. J. Stephen, "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" (1993), Liberty Fund
  26. P.Suber, "Paternalism, The Philosophy of Law. An Encyclopedia" (1999), Garland
  27. C. Sunstein, "Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron", The University of Chicago Law Review, 70 (2003)
  28. C.L. Ten, "Paternalism and Morality", Ratio, 13 (1971)
  29. D. VanDeVeer, "Paternalistic Intervention" (1986), Princeton UP
  30. The Wolfendon Report, "The Committee on Homosexual Offenses and Prostitution", Stein and Day, ~ (1963)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)