본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

부동산임차권의 승계에 따른 사실혼배우자의 주거권 보호

Protection of the Residential Right for the De Facto Marriage Spouses based on the Succession of the Real Estate Lease - Based on the theory of interpretation in regard to Article 9 of the Housing Lease Protection Law -

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The state of de facto marriage means that even if both spouses show their intention of getting married with each other and actually share their life together as a husband and a wife, their relationship is not recognized as the legal marriage, since they do not satisfy the typical legal conditions related to the registration of marriage. The de facto spouses inevitably need to possess real estate (housing) in order to manage their marriage. Even if it is not the only way which is available, it can be said that such possession depends on the lease of real estate as long as the social state is considered. Also, it can be said that the lease of real estate is the essential basis of survival for the management of marriage by the de facto spouses. According to the lease of real estate which is concluded in such a state, it is possible to ask for the return of the housing rental deposit which has been paid to the lessor when the contract ends. Since the right to ask for the housing rental deposit has the characteristic of the property right,it is subject to inheritance when the lessee who is the party involved in the contract passes away. However, according to the current civil law, the living de facto spouse is not included in the range of heirs. Regarding such a condition, there have been many positive and negative opinions for a long time in regard to the possibility of inheritance according to the theory of interpretation,while there have been precedents against it. As a result, the destiny of the living de facto spouse is subject to the judgment of the legal heir in regard to the right of residence for the rental housing which has been possessed for the marriage with the lessee. In other words, according to the laws in Korea, the real estate lease belongs to the property right, it is possible for the heir who inherits all the related rights and duties when the lessee passes away to deprive the living de facto spouse of his or her right of residence. Fortunately, the legal system in Korea provides the basis for the inheritance of a lease by the living de facto spouse who has had the relationship of de facto marriage with the deceased de facto spouse according to the Housing Lease Protection Law. According to the law, when the lessee passes away without having any heir, the de facto spouse who has had the relationship of de facto marriage in the subject house inherits the rights and duties of the lessee. If the heir of the deceased de facto spouse does not live in the subject house, the living de facto spouse who has lived in the subject house and the close relatives including brothers and sisters can jointly inherit the rights and duties of the lessee. However, such succession of rights enables the successor of the lease to possess the bonds and debts generated by the lessee in regard to the lease. In such a case,the successor specified in the above law can show his or her intention of objection to the lessor in regard to the succession of the lease within one month, in order to give up the succession of bonds and debts. Therefore, the legal system in Korea specifies certain conditions for the living de facto spouse as an exceptional case of civil law, recognizing his or her right of residence for the house in which he or she has lived with the deceased de facto spouse through the succession of the lease. However, the regulations of the Housing Lease Protection Law are not detailed,most of them are based on the interpretation of the precedents. Also, Article 9 of the same law requires such interpretation. However, there are many different opinions in regard to the interpretation. Therefore, through the approach based on the theory of interpretation for Article 9 of the Housing Lease Protection Law, this paper focuses on several problems related to the protection of the right of residence by the living de facto spouse.

Abstract

The state of de facto marriage means that even if both spouses show their intention of getting married with each other and actually share their life together as a husband and a wife, their relationship is not recognized as the legal marriage, since they do not satisfy the typical legal conditions related to the registration of marriage. The de facto spouses inevitably need to possess real estate (housing) in order to manage their marriage. Even if it is not the only way which is available, it can be said that such possession depends on the lease of real estate as long as the social state is considered. Also, it can be said that the lease of real estate is the essential basis of survival for the management of marriage by the de facto spouses. According to the lease of real estate which is concluded in such a state, it is possible to ask for the return of the housing rental deposit which has been paid to the lessor when the contract ends. Since the right to ask for the housing rental deposit has the characteristic of the property right,it is subject to inheritance when the lessee who is the party involved in the contract passes away. However, according to the current civil law, the living de facto spouse is not included in the range of heirs. Regarding such a condition, there have been many positive and negative opinions for a long time in regard to the possibility of inheritance according to the theory of interpretation,while there have been precedents against it. As a result, the destiny of the living de facto spouse is subject to the judgment of the legal heir in regard to the right of residence for the rental housing which has been possessed for the marriage with the lessee. In other words, according to the laws in Korea, the real estate lease belongs to the property right, it is possible for the heir who inherits all the related rights and duties when the lessee passes away to deprive the living de facto spouse of his or her right of residence. Fortunately, the legal system in Korea provides the basis for the inheritance of a lease by the living de facto spouse who has had the relationship of de facto marriage with the deceased de facto spouse according to the Housing Lease Protection Law. According to the law, when the lessee passes away without having any heir, the de facto spouse who has had the relationship of de facto marriage in the subject house inherits the rights and duties of the lessee. If the heir of the deceased de facto spouse does not live in the subject house, the living de facto spouse who has lived in the subject house and the close relatives including brothers and sisters can jointly inherit the rights and duties of the lessee. However, such succession of rights enables the successor of the lease to possess the bonds and debts generated by the lessee in regard to the lease. In such a case,the successor specified in the above law can show his or her intention of objection to the lessor in regard to the succession of the lease within one month, in order to give up the succession of bonds and debts. Therefore, the legal system in Korea specifies certain conditions for the living de facto spouse as an exceptional case of civil law, recognizing his or her right of residence for the house in which he or she has lived with the deceased de facto spouse through the succession of the lease. However, the regulations of the Housing Lease Protection Law are not detailed,most of them are based on the interpretation of the precedents. Also, Article 9 of the same law requires such interpretation. However, there are many different opinions in regard to the interpretation. Therefore, through the approach based on the theory of interpretation for Article 9 of the Housing Lease Protection Law, this paper focuses on several problems related to the protection of the right of residence by the living de facto spouse.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 곽윤직, "상속법" (2004), 박영사
  2. 곽윤직 편집대표, "곽윤직" (2007), 박영사
  3. 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2010), 법문사
  4. 김준호, "민법강의" (2010), 법문사
  5. 김증한, "채권각론" (2006), 박영사
  6. 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2009), 박영사
  7. 이경희, "가족법" (2008), 법원사
  8. 이은영, "채권각론" (2005), 박영사
  9. 지원림, "민법강의" (2009), 홍문사
  10. 고상룡, "임차권의 승계(중)", 사법행정, 25(12) (1984), 한국사법행정학회
  11. 고상룡, "주택임대차보호법의 문제점과 그 개선방향", 민사법학, (4) (1985), 한국민사법학회
  12. 고상룡, "임차권의 승계제도" (1988), 삼영사
  13. 고창현, "사실혼과 부의 법적 지위", 사회과학연구, 4 (1981), 조선대학교사회과학연구소
  14. 고형석, "사실혼 배우자의 주택임차권의 승계에 관한 연구", 한양법학, (30), pp.103~124 (2010), 한양법학회
  15. 김상용, "사실혼 배우자의 상속권에 관한 시론(試論)", 중앙법학, 9(2), pp.511~546 (2007), 중앙법학회
  16. 김형수, "주택임대차보호법에 관한 연구", 법과정책, (4) (1998), 청주대학교
  17. 박인환, "死亡에 의한 事實婚의 解消와 財産分割의 類推", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.161~206 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  18. 안영하, "주택임대차보호법 제9조에 의한 임차권의 승계 - 주택임대차보호법 제9조의 해석상의 문제를 중심으로-", 비교사법, 15(2), pp.215~250 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
  19. 이병화, "사실혼 부부의 법적 지위", 동덕여성연구, (5) (1997), 동덕여자대학교
  20. 이상혁, "주택임대차보호법상 임차권의 승계" (1992), 박영사
  21. 이영무, "선순위상속인들이 상속을 포기하였을 경우 상속재산이 차순위상속인에게 귀속되는지 여부에 관하여", 인권과 정의, (239) (1996), ,
  22. 이화숙, "채무초과 상속재산에 대한 채권자의 권리와 상속인보호 -상속포기제도를 중심으로-", 비교사법, 4(1) (1997), 한국비교사법학회
  23. 이해진, "주택임대차보호법의 개정방향", 변호사:법률실무연구, 20 (1990), 서울지방변호사회
  24. 임정평, "사실혼 문제에 관한 고찰-故경해박종성박사 회갑기념호(추모)-", 법학논총, 13 (1985), 단국대학교
  25. 윤 진 수, "事實婚配偶者 一方이 사망한 경우의 財産問題", 저스티스, (100), pp.5~39 (2007), 한국법학원
  26. 주택임차권 승계규정의 문제점, "윤천희", 개정주택임대차보호법 해설, 문조사, ~ (1985)
  27. 조일환, "임대차보호법과 주거권승계에 관한 연구" (1987), 박영사
  28. 조종현, "주택임차권의 주거보호" (1987), 박영사
  29. 최금숙, "현행민법상 상속인규정에 대한 재검토", 가족법연구, 18(1), pp.75~126 (2004), 한국가족법학회
  30. 최한수, "사실혼관계에 대한 전반적 고찰", 사법논집, 16 (1986), 법원행정처

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)