Radiological gastrostomy: A comparative analysis of different image-guided methods
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Radiographic guided percutaneous gastrostomy has become a safe and effective enteral nutrition method for patients who can not eat by mouth. Fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT have been routinely used clinically. The aim of this study was to compare the advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous gastrostomy using different radiographic guided methods. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 538 patients undergoing percutaneous gastrostomy in our department. According to the image guidance method used in gastrostomy, the patients were divided into groups A by fluoroscopy guidance, group B by fluoroscopy combined with C-arm CT guidance, and group C with the whole process CT guidance. The gastrostomy success rate, complication rate, procedure time, and patient radiation dose were analyzed in the three groups. Results: Among 538 patients, 534 were successful and the success rates are 94.3%, 99.3%, and 100% in group A, B, and C, respectively (P > 0.05). There were 3 cases occurred postoperative bleeding as serious adverse events and transferred to surgical gastrostomy. The minor complications include local infection, hyperplasia of granulation tissue, tube obstruction or prolapse, and local pain of the ostomy. The minor complication rates were 10.5%, 10.4%, and 7.7% in group A, B, and C, respectively (P > 0.05). The average procedure time was 25.57 ± 5.99 minutes, 29.01 ± 6.63 minutes, and 45.47 ± 8.98 minutes, respectively (χ2 = 87.98, P < 0.001). The average radiation dosage was 27.30 ± 19.27 mGy, 145.07 ± 106.08 mGy, and 2,590.26 ± 1,088.22 mGy, respectively (χ2 = 204.44, P < 0.001). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the success rates and complication rates of gastrostomy under the three guiding methods. For difficult cases, CT-guided gastrostomy may be a very useful supplemental method.
Abstract
Background: Radiographic guided percutaneous gastrostomy has become a safe and effective enteral nutrition method for patients who can not eat by mouth. Fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT have been routinely used clinically. The aim of this study was to compare the advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous gastrostomy using different radiographic guided methods. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 538 patients undergoing percutaneous gastrostomy in our department. According to the image guidance method used in gastrostomy, the patients were divided into groups A by fluoroscopy guidance, group B by fluoroscopy combined with C-arm CT guidance, and group C with the whole process CT guidance. The gastrostomy success rate, complication rate, procedure time, and patient radiation dose were analyzed in the three groups. Results: Among 538 patients, 534 were successful and the success rates are 94.3%, 99.3%, and 100% in group A, B, and C, respectively (P > 0.05). There were 3 cases occurred postoperative bleeding as serious adverse events and transferred to surgical gastrostomy. The minor complications include local infection, hyperplasia of granulation tissue, tube obstruction or prolapse, and local pain of the ostomy. The minor complication rates were 10.5%, 10.4%, and 7.7% in group A, B, and C, respectively (P > 0.05). The average procedure time was 25.57 ± 5.99 minutes, 29.01 ± 6.63 minutes, and 45.47 ± 8.98 minutes, respectively (χ2 = 87.98, P < 0.001). The average radiation dosage was 27.30 ± 19.27 mGy, 145.07 ± 106.08 mGy, and 2,590.26 ± 1,088.22 mGy, respectively (χ2 = 204.44, P < 0.001). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the success rates and complication rates of gastrostomy under the three guiding methods. For difficult cases, CT-guided gastrostomy may be a very useful supplemental method.
참고문헌 (21)
- Preshaw RM, "A percutaneous method for inserting a feeding gastrostomy tube", Surg Gynecol Obstet, 152, pp.658~660 (1981)
- Shellnutt C, "The evidence on feeding initiation after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement", Gastroenterol Nurs, 42, pp.420~427 (2019)
- Rahnemai-Azar AA, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management", World J Gastroenterol, 20, pp.7739~7751 (2014)
- Tsukuda T, "Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy using push-type gastrostomy tubes with CT and fluoroscopic guidance", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 186, pp.574~576 (2006)
- Neeff M, "Comparison of the use of endoscopic and radiologic gastrostomy in a single head and neck cancer unit", ANZ J Surg, 73, pp.590~593 (2003)
- Partovi S, "Image guided percutaneous gastrostomy catheter placement: how we do it safely and efficiently", World J Gastroenterol, 26, pp.383~392 (2020)
- Möhlenbruch M, "Cone-beam computed tomography-guided percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy", Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 33, pp.315~320 (2010)
- Jiang XY, "CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy without preliminary placement of a nasogastric tube", J Vasc Interv Radiol, 30, pp.915~917 (2019)
- Hu HT, "Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous jejunostomy with use of a 21-gauge needle: a prospective study in 51 patients", J Vasc Interv Radiol, 20, pp.1583~1587 (2009)
- Laranjo A, "Feasibility, safety and outcome of endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with esophageal cancer", Nutr Hosp, 37, pp.660~666 (2020)
- "American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: guidelines for the use of enteral nutrition", Gastroenterology, 108, pp.1280~1281 (1995)
- Watanabe J, "Early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: a meta-analysis", Children (Basel), 7, pp.124~ (2020)
- Szary NM, "Enteral feeding within three hours after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement:a meta-analysis", J Clin Gastroenterol, 45, pp.e34~e38 (2011)
- Sofue K, "Value of percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer", Ann Surg Oncol, 23, pp.3623~3631 (2016)
- Low GZ, "Percutaneous radiologically-guided gastrostomy (PRG): safety, efficacy and trends in a single institution", Ann Acad Med Singap, 47, pp.494~498 (2018)
- Han K, "Randomized controlled trial comparing radiologic pigtail-retained gastrostomy and radiologic mushroomretained gastrostomy", J Vasc Interv Radiol, 28, pp.1702~1707 (2017)
- Uflacker A, "Fluoroscopy-guided jejunal extension tube placement through existing gastrostomy tubes: analysis of 391 procedures", Diagn Interv Radiol, 21, pp.488~493 (2015)
- Kahriman G, "Fluoroscopy-guided placement of pull-type mushroom-retained gastrostomy tubes in 102 patients", Diagn Interv Imaging, 98, pp.715~720 (2017)
- Hirota S, "Conebeam CT with flat-panel-detector digital angiography system: early experience in abdominal interventional procedures", Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 29, pp.1034~1038 (2006)
- Wu TS, "Ultrasound can accurately guide gastrostomy tube replacement and confirm proper tube placement at the bedside", J Emerg Med, 36, pp.280~284 (2009)
- Moriwaki Y, "Percutaneous sonographically assisted endoscopic gastrostomy for difficult cases with interposed organs", Nutrition, 54, pp.100~104 (2018)