A formal scheme for prosodic disalignment
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper presents a formalized scheme for the representation of constraints that codify the force of prosodic repulsion, a concept first introduced in Hart (2015a) and expanded upon in Hart (2015b). Prosodic repulsion embodies a force of resistance between phonological entities which works together in concert with a force of attraction between entities to define and regulate prosodic structure. While the force of attraction has commonly been referred to as alignment, the force of repulsion can analogously be understood as disalignment. The proposed scheme for the formalization of such disalignment has here been dubbed Generalized Repulsion for the commonalities it shares with the constraint scheme proposed by McCarthy and Prince (1993), yet it differs from Generalized Alignment in several respects. First, the arguments of GR constraints indicating the relevant prosodic structures are both marked with the universal operator. Second, reference to only one edge is required. Third, an additional argument is included to represent the buffer, which is the minimal distance required between the two constituents that repel each other. With the introduction of this constraint scheme, the overall phonological grammar as a whole is simplified, and several previously unconnected phonological phenomena can be brought together under a single theoretical umbrella.
Abstract
This paper presents a formalized scheme for the representation of constraints that codify the force of prosodic repulsion, a concept first introduced in Hart (2015a) and expanded upon in Hart (2015b). Prosodic repulsion embodies a force of resistance between phonological entities which works together in concert with a force of attraction between entities to define and regulate prosodic structure. While the force of attraction has commonly been referred to as alignment, the force of repulsion can analogously be understood as disalignment. The proposed scheme for the formalization of such disalignment has here been dubbed Generalized Repulsion for the commonalities it shares with the constraint scheme proposed by McCarthy and Prince (1993), yet it differs from Generalized Alignment in several respects. First, the arguments of GR constraints indicating the relevant prosodic structures are both marked with the universal operator. Second, reference to only one edge is required. Third, an additional argument is included to represent the buffer, which is the minimal distance required between the two constituents that repel each other. With the introduction of this constraint scheme, the overall phonological grammar as a whole is simplified, and several previously unconnected phonological phenomena can be brought together under a single theoretical umbrella.
참고문헌 (33)
- ALDERETE, JOHN, "Dissimilation as local conjunction", Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 27, pp.17~32 (1997), GLSA
- BRADSHAW, MARY M., "Unrecoverable origins. Handout", Tilburg Conference on Derivational Residue (1995)
- CHEN, MATTHEW Y., "Phonology Yearbook 4", pp.109~150 (1987)
- CLEMENTS, GEORGE NICK, "Elements of Tone, Stress, and Intonation", pp.21~99 (1978), Georgetown University Press
- DE LACY, PAUL, "The Formal Expression of Markedness", Doctor, pp.2002
- DE LACY, PAUL, "Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology", Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 112 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- DE LACY, PAUL, "A Companion to Phonology", pp.1491~1512 (2011), Blackwell
- DOWNING, LAURA J., "On the prosodic misalignment of onsetless syllables", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, pp.1~52 (1998)
- EISNER, JASON, "Doing OT in a straightjacket", Ms, pp.1999
- GOLDSMITH, JOHN, "Information theoretic approaches to phonology: The case of Finnish vowel harmony", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30(3), pp.859~896 (2012)
- GOUSKOVA, MARIA, "Deriving Economy: Syncope in Optimality Theory", PhD, pp.2003
- GOUSKOVA, MARIA, "Relational hierarchies in OT: The case of syllable contact", Phonology, 21(2), pp.201~250 (2004)
- HALE, KENNETH, "Phonology Yearbook 4", pp.151~183 (1987)
- HALLE, MORRIS, "An Essay on Stress" (1987), MIT Press
- 윌리엄하트, "Prosodic Repulsion in English and Cairene Arabic", 음성음운형태론연구, 21(1), pp.143~168 (2015), 한국음운론학회[DOI]
- 윌리엄하트, "Prosodic buffers: A constraint-based account of English vowel laxing", 음성음운형태론연구, 21(2), pp.257~277 (2015), 한국음운론학회[DOI]
- HAYES, BRUCE, "A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules", PhD, pp.1980
- HYDE, BRETT, "Nonfinality and weight sensitivity", Phonology, 24, pp.287~334 (2007)
- HYDE, BRETT, "A Companion to Phonology", pp.1027~1051 (2011), Blackwell
- KAGER, RENÉ, "Ternary rhythm in alignment theory", Ms, pp.1994
- KAGER, RENÉ, "Optimality Theory" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- LIBERMAN, MARK, "On stress and linguistic rhythm", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.249~336 (1977)
- MCCARTHY, JOHN J., "OT constraints are categorical", Phonology, 20, pp.75~138 (2003)
- MCCARTHY, JOHN J., "Yearbook of Morphology 1993", pp.79~153 (1993), Kluwer
- PATER, JOE, "The Prosody Morphology Interface", pp.310~343 (1999), Cambridge University Press
- POTTS, CHRISTOPHER, "Model theory and the content of OT constraints", Phonology, 19, pp.361~393 (2002)
- PRINCE, ALAN, "Relating to the grid", Linguistic Inquiry, 14, pp.19~100 (1983)
- PRINCE, ALAN, "Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar" (2004), Blackwell
- SELKIRK, ELISABETH O., "Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure" (1984), MIT Press
- SELKIRK, ELISABETH O., "Phonology Yearbook 3", pp.371~405 (1986)
- SELKIRK, ELISABETH O., "The prosodic structure of functional elements: Affixes, clitics and words", Handout of talk presented at Signal to Syntax Conference (1993), Brown University
- SELKIRK, ELISABETH O., "The Phonology-Syntax Connection" (1990), The University of Chicago Press
- SELKIRK, ELISABETH O., "Minor phrase formation in Japanese", Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp.316~336 (1988), Chicago Linguistics Society