본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Asymmetric tense consonant effects in compound and word-initial tensifications in Korean

오미라|강희조
한국음운론학회 (The Phonology-Morphology Circle of Korea)|2019.05|음성음운형태론연구 (Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology)|제25권 제1호|pp. 3-30|DOI 10.17959/sppm.2019.25.1.3

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

compound tensificationlaryngeal co-occurrence restrictionword-initial tensification
주제분류언어학

초록

A tense consonant blocks compound tensification (Ito 2014, S. Kim 2016) but facilitates word-initial tensification in Korean (Kang and Oh 2016, H. Kim 2016). Previous studies examined such a tense consonant effect as dissimilatory in compounds but as assimiliatory in simplex words separately. The aims of this paper are twofold. First, we will test if a tense consonant is affected differently depending on the morphosyntactic domains by studying both compound and word-initial tensification processes, unlike previous studies. Second, we will investigate what motivates the asymmetry of the tense consonant effect between compound and word-initial tensification processes. We conducted a survey where 40 Korean speakers selected their own pronunciations for 120 compounds and 100 simplex words. We found that a tense consonant in fact behaves differently in compound and in word-initial tensification processes. We present two possible reasons why such a difference is observed. The perception view assumes that each tensification has its own perceptual function. Compound tensification is intended to make a compound perceptually distinguishable from each of its components. Compound tensification is then avoided before another tense consonant since a tense-tense sequence of consonants could make them perceptibly similar to simplex words. The production view of the tense consonant effect emphasizes the avoidance of consecutive long vowel-to-vowel intervals. Laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions attested in tensification in Korean will be discussed in light of both production and perception.

Abstract

A tense consonant blocks compound tensification (Ito 2014, S. Kim 2016) but facilitates word-initial tensification in Korean (Kang and Oh 2016, H. Kim 2016). Previous studies examined such a tense consonant effect as dissimilatory in compounds but as assimiliatory in simplex words separately. The aims of this paper are twofold. First, we will test if a tense consonant is affected differently depending on the morphosyntactic domains by studying both compound and word-initial tensification processes, unlike previous studies. Second, we will investigate what motivates the asymmetry of the tense consonant effect between compound and word-initial tensification processes. We conducted a survey where 40 Korean speakers selected their own pronunciations for 120 compounds and 100 simplex words. We found that a tense consonant in fact behaves differently in compound and in word-initial tensification processes. We present two possible reasons why such a difference is observed. The perception view assumes that each tensification has its own perceptual function. Compound tensification is intended to make a compound perceptually distinguishable from each of its components. Compound tensification is then avoided before another tense consonant since a tense-tense sequence of consonants could make them perceptibly similar to simplex words. The production view of the tense consonant effect emphasizes the avoidance of consecutive long vowel-to-vowel intervals. Laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions attested in tensification in Korean will be discussed in light of both production and perception.

참고문헌 (72)

  1. AHN, SANG-CHEOL., "The Interplay of Phonology and Morphology in Korean", PhD, pp.1985
  2. BAAYEN, R. HARALD, "Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding", pp.257~270 (2010), John Benjamins
  3. BAUER, LAURIE., "The Handbook of English Linguistics", pp.483~506 (2006), Wiley-Blackwell
  4. BLEVINS, JULIETTE., "Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  5. BYBEE, JOAN., "Phonology and Language Use" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  6. BYBEE, JOAN, "Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change", Language Variation and Change, 14, pp.261~290 (2002)
  7. BYE, PATRIK., "The Blackwell Companion to Phonology Volume III", pp.1408~1433 (2011)
  8. CHO, TAEHONG, "Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives", Journal of Phonetics, 30, pp.193~228 (2002)
  9. CHOI, HANSOOK, "Vowel duration as a perceptual cue for preceding stop laryngeal contrast in Korean", ICPhS, 17, pp.484~487 (2011)
  10. CHOI, SEONGWON, "Are Korean fortis and aspirated consonants geminates?", Language Research, 34, pp.521~546 (1998), Language Education Institute
  11. CHOMSKY, NOAM, "The Sound Pattern of English" (1968), Harper and Row
  12. FRISCH, STEFAN A., "Similarity avoidance and the OCP", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, pp.179~228 (2004)
  13. GAFOS, ADAMANTIOS I., "The Blackwell Companion to Phonology Volume IV", pp.2164~2189 (2011)
  14. GALLAGHER, GILLIAN, "Perceptual distinctness and long-distance laryngeal restrictions", Phonology, 27, pp.435~480 (2010)
  15. "The Linguistic Review", 2011, 281~313
  16. GOLDSMITH, JOHN A., "Autosegmental Phonology", PhD, pp.1976
  17. HAN, JEONG-IM., "The Phonetics and Phonology of “Tense” and “Plain” Consonants in Korean", PhD, pp.1996
  18. HAN, MYEONG-SUK, "A Study on the Word-initial Glottalization in Korean", PhD, pp.2011
  19. 한명숙, "한국어 용언의 어두 경음화 현상 연구", 겨레어문학, (51), pp.639~672 (2013), 겨레어문학회
  20. HAYES, BRUCE, "The Phonology of Rhythm in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, pp.33~74 (1984)
  21. HAYES, BRUCE, "A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning", Linguistic Inquiry, 39, pp.379~440 (2008)
  22. HUH, WOONG., "Gugeohak (Korean Linguistics)" (1983), Saemmunhwasa
  23. ITO, CHIYUKI, "Compound tensification and laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions in Yanbian Korean", Phonology, 31, pp.349~398 (2014)
  24. ITO, JUNKO, "The Phonology of Voicing in Japanese : Theoretical Consequences for Morphological Accessibility", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.49~73 (1986)
  25. ITO, JUNKO, "Markedness and Word Structure: OCP Effects in Japanese", Ms, pp.1998
  26. ITO, JUNKO, "Japanese Morphophonemics : Markedness and Word Structure" (2003), MIT Press
  27. KANG, BEOMMO, "Hangukeo Sayongbindo (Frequency of use in Korean)" (2009), Hankookmunhwasa
  28. 강희조, "Dynamic and static aspects of laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions in Korean", 음성음운형태론연구, 22(1), pp.3~34 (2016), 한국음운론학회[DOI]
  30. KANG, YOONJUNG, "Voice Onset Time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops : A corpus study", Journal of Phonetics, 45, pp.76~90 (2014)
  31. KIM, CHANGSEOP, "Kugŏhak Chongsŏ 21" (1996), Taehaksa
  32. 김효주, "Contextual distribution of English loanword word-initial tensification in Korean", 음성음운형태론연구, 22(2), pp.245~288 (2016), 한국음운론학회[DOI]
  33. 김진형, "한국어 합성명사 경음화 변이에서의 형태론적 효과", 음성음운형태론연구, 23(3), pp.349~364 (2017), 한국음운론학회[DOI]
  34. KIM, MIDAM, "Correlation between VOT and F0 in the perception of Korean stops and affricates", Interspeech, 2004, pp.49~52 (2004)
  35. KIM, SEOYOUNG., "Phonological Trends in Seoul Korean Compound Tensification", MA, pp.2016
  36. KRÄMER, MARTIN., "Vowel Harmony and Correspondence Theory" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  37. KUBOZONO, HARUO., "The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics", pp.165~191 (2008), Oxford University Press
  38. LADEFOGED, PETER, "Vocal Physiology: Voice Production, Mechanisms and Functions", pp.292~317 (1988), Raven
  39. LEBEN, WILLIAM R., "Suprasegmental Phonology", PhD, pp.1973
  40. LEE, HYUN-BOK., "Standard Korean Pronouncing Dictionary" (2002), Seoul National University Press
  41. LEE, MI-JAE, "A Sociolinguistic Study of Language Change", PhD, pp.1989
  42. Ponghyung Lee, "Three types of laryngeal feature adaptation in Korean secondhand loanwords", 음성음운형태론연구, 13(3), pp.521~537 (2007), 한국음운론학회[DOI]
  43. LEE, SEON HA., "Production of Korean Stops by Korean Learners: In Neutral Words and Focused Words", PhD, pp.2018
  44. MACEACHERN, MAGARET R., "Laryngeal Co-occurrence Restrictions" (1999), Garland
  45. MCCARTHY, JOHN J., "Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology", PhD, pp.1979
  46. MCCARTHY, JOHN J, "A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology", Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.373~418 (1981)
  47. MCCARTHY, JOHN J, "OCP effects : Gemination and antigemination", Liguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.207~263 (1986)
  48. MCCARTHY, JOHN J, "Feature geometry and dependency : A review", Phonetica, 45, pp.84~108 (1988)
  49. MCINTYRE, JOSEPH., "Hausa Verbal Compounds", PhD, pp.2006
  50. NEIJT, ANNEKE, "Rhythm versus Analogy – Prosodic Form Variation in Dutch Compounds", Language and Speech, 50, pp.533~566 (2007)
  51. ODDEN, DAVID, "Anti antigemination and the OCP", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.451~475 (1988)
  52. 오미라, "영어 유성 자음의 경음 차용에 대한 한국어 음운제약 효과", 언어학, 25(2), pp.121~141 (2017), 대한언어학회[DOI]
  53. OH, MIRA, "A phonetic study of Korean intervocalic laryngeal consonants", Journal of Speech Sciences, 1, pp.83~101 (1997)
  54. OH, MIRA, "An asymmetric effect of the following laryngeal category on VOT in Korean", A paper presented at ICKL, pp.20~ (2017)
  55. OHALA, JOHN J, "The listener as a source of sound change", Chicago Linguistic Society, 17, pp.178~203 (1981)
  56. OHALA, JOHN J., "Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives", pp.237~278 (1993), Longman
  57. OHALA, JOHN J., "The Handbook of Historical Linguistics", pp.669~686 (2003), Wiley-Blackwell
  58. PANDHARIPANDE, RAJESHWARI V., "Marathi" (1997), Routledge
  60. 박동근, "말머리에 나타나는 이유 없는 된소리 현상 연구", 언어학, (27), pp.179~200 (2000), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  61. ROSE, SHARON, "A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence", Language, 80, pp.475~531 (2004)
  62. ROSE, SHARON, "The Handbook of Phonological Theory", pp.240~290 (2014), Wiley Blackwell
  63. SCALISE, SERGIO, "Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding", pp.1~18 (2010), John Benjamins
  64. SELKIRK, ELIZABETH O., "Phonology and Syntax : The Relation between Sound and Structure" (1984), MIT Press
  65. STERIADE, DONCA., "Intervals vs. syllables as units of linguistic rhythm", A paper presented at EALING (2012)
  66. VAN DER HULST, HARRY, "The Handbook of Phonological Theory", pp.495~534 (1995), Blackwell Publishers
  67. VOGEL, IRENE., "Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding", pp.145~163 (2010), John Benjamins
  68. 위진, "전남방언에 나타난 어두경음화", 한국언어문학, (65), pp.111~136 (2008), 한국언어문학회
  69. WIESE, RICHARD, "Schwa and the Structure of Words in German", German Linguistics, 24, pp.697~724 (1986)
  70. 우순조, "음운론적으로 조건화되지 않은 경음화의 환경과 제약", 언어학, (79), pp.159~192 (2017), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
  71. YUN, SUNG KYU, "Epenthetic s in compound nouns", English Linguistic Science, 16, pp.1~13 (2006), The English Linguistic Science Association of Korea[DOI]
  72. ZURAW, KIE., "Predicting Korean sai-siot: phonological and non-phonological factors", A paper presented at the 21st Japanese, 2011, ~

관련 논문AI추천

Productivity of compound tensification in Seoul Korean이유나한국음운론학회 · 음성음운형태론연구2024 · 제30권 제2호Korean Initial Tensification towards Prominence Enhancement이봉형한국언어학회 · 언어2008 · 제33권 제4호한국어 합성명사 경음화 변이에서의 형태론적 효과김진형한국음운론학회 · 음성음운형태론연구2017 · 제23권 제3호Dynamic and static aspects of laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions in Korean강희조, 오미라한국음운론학회 · 음성음운형태론연구2016 · 제22권 제1호Lengthening and shortening processes in Korean강현숙, 김태경한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2020 · 제12권 제3호A perception-based analysis of voice onset time (VOT) dissimilation in Korean강희조, 오미라한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2024 · 제16권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

중세한국어 모음조화의 양상에 대하여박선우pp. 31-56영어 화자의 한국어 2음절 단어 발화에 나타나는 운율패턴 연구이고운, 신동진pp. 57-71Preliminary findings of co-occurrence restrictions in the consonant insertion case of Korean안영란pp. 73-94이층위 신경망 모형을 사용한 포먼트 궤적 기반 모음 유형 분류윤태진pp. 95-112음성학/음운론 분야 학술논문에서의 어휘다발 분석: 코퍼스 기반 연구이제영pp. 113-129
원문 보기