The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial cellulose (BC) membranes as a barrier membrane on guided bone regeneration (GBR) in comparison with those of the resorbable collagen membranes. MATERIALS AND METHODS. BC membranes were fabricated using biomimetic technology. Surface properties were analyzed, Mechanical properties were measured, in vitro cell proliferation test were performed with NIH3T3 cells and in vivo study were performed with rat calvarial defect and histomorphometric analysis was done. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used (α<.05). RESULTS. BC membrane showed significantly higher mechanical properties such as wet tensile strength than collagen membrane and represented a three-dimensional multilayered structure cross-linked by nano-fibers with 60 % porosity. In vitro study, cell adhesion and proliferation were observed on BC membrane. However, morphology of the cells was found to be less differentiated, and the cell proliferation rate was lower than those of the cells on collagen membrane. In vivo study, the grafted BC membrane did not induce inflammatory response, and maintained adequate space for bone regeneration. An amount of new bone formation in defect region loaded with BC membrane was significantly similar to that of collagen membrane application. CONCLUSION. BC membrane has potential to be used as a barrier membrane, and efficacy of the membrane on GBR is comparable to that of collagen membrane.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial cellulose (BC) membranes as a barrier membrane on guided bone regeneration (GBR) in comparison with those of the resorbable collagen membranes. MATERIALS AND METHODS. BC membranes were fabricated using biomimetic technology. Surface properties were analyzed, Mechanical properties were measured, in vitro cell proliferation test were performed with NIH3T3 cells and in vivo study were performed with rat calvarial defect and histomorphometric analysis was done. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used (α<.05). RESULTS. BC membrane showed significantly higher mechanical properties such as wet tensile strength than collagen membrane and represented a three-dimensional multilayered structure cross-linked by nano-fibers with 60 % porosity. In vitro study, cell adhesion and proliferation were observed on BC membrane. However, morphology of the cells was found to be less differentiated, and the cell proliferation rate was lower than those of the cells on collagen membrane. In vivo study, the grafted BC membrane did not induce inflammatory response, and maintained adequate space for bone regeneration. An amount of new bone formation in defect region loaded with BC membrane was significantly similar to that of collagen membrane application. CONCLUSION. BC membrane has potential to be used as a barrier membrane, and efficacy of the membrane on GBR is comparable to that of collagen membrane.
참고문헌 (45)
- Brånemark PI, "Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry", pp.199~209 (1985), Quintessence
- Misch CM, "Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.767~776 (1997)
- Oda T, "Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using a simple device that permits secondary implant placement", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.95~102 (2000)
- Hämmerle CH, "Guided bone regeneration at oral implant sites", Periodontol 2000, 17, pp.151~175 (1998)
- Ashley FL, "Experimental and clinical studies on the application of monomolecular cellulose filter tubes to create artificial tendon sheaths in digits", Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull, 23, pp.526~534 (1959)
- Buser D, "Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients", J Periodontol, 80, pp.152~162 (2009)
- Schwarz F, "Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.402~415 (2008)
- Scantlebury TV, "1982-1992: a decade of technology development for guided tissue regeneration", J Periodontol, 64, pp.1129~1137 (1993)
- Buser D, "Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry", pp.32~34 (1994), Quintessence
- Sculean A, "Regeneration of periodontal tissues: combinations of barrier membranes and grafting materials - biological foundation and preclinical evidence:a systematic review", J Clin Periodontol, 35, pp.106~116 (2008)
- Behring J, "Toward guided tissue and bone regeneration: morphology, attachment, proliferation, and migration of cells cultured on collagen bar rier membranes. A systematic review", Odontology, 96, pp.1~11 (2008)
- Kasaj A, "In vitro evaluation of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration", Head Face Med, 4, pp.22~ (2008)
- Gentile P, "Polymeric membranes for guided bone regeneration", Biotechnol J, 6, pp.1187~1197 (2011)
- Polimeni G, "Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: effect of space provision", J Clin Periodontol, 32, pp.951~954 (2005)
- Zhang J, "Biological properties of an anti-bacterial membrane for guided bone regeneration:an experimental study in rats", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.321~327 (2010)
- Jovanovic SA, "Bone reconstruction following implantation of rhBMP-2 and guided bone regeneration in canine alveolar ridge defects", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.224~230 (2007)
- von Arx T, "Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.359~366 (2006)
- Fujihara K, "Guided bone regeneration membrane made of polycaprolactone", calcium carbonate composite nano-fibers, 2005, pp.26, 4139~4147
- Jung RE, "A feasibility study evaluating an in situ formed synthetic biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration in dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.151~161 (2009)
- Schwarz F, "Guided bone regeneration at dehiscence-type defects using biphasic hydroxyapatite + beta tricalcium phosphate (Bone Ceramic) or a collagen-coated natural bone mineral (BioOss Collagen): an immunohistochemical study in dogs", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 36, pp.1198~1206 (2007)
- Felipe ME, "Comparison of two surgical procedures for use of the acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical study", J Periodontol, 78, pp.1209~1217 (2007)
- Wang HL, "Utilization of a resorbable collagen membrane in repairing gingival recession defects", Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 8, pp.441~448 (1996)
- Dahlin C, "Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration", Plast Reconstr Surg, 81, pp.672~676 (1988)
- Shim JH, "Fabrication of blended polycaprolactone", poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), Tissue Eng Part A, pp.2013, 19[DOI]
- 김성민, "멍게와 미더덕 피부의 천연 셀룰로오스 각질을 이용한 골재생 효능을 가진 생활성막의 개발 - 예비 연구", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 31(5), pp.440~453 (2005), 대한구강악안면외과학회
- Dugan JM, "Bacterial cellulose scaffolds and cellulose nanowhiskers for tissue engineering", Nanomedicine, 8, pp.287~298 (2013)
- Embuscado ME, "Bacterial cellulose. II. Optimization of cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum through response surface methodology", Food Hydrocoll, 8, pp.419~430 (1994)
- Rainer J, "Production and application of microbial cellulose", Polym Degrad Stab, 59, pp.101~106 (1998)
- Busch O, "Guided tissue regeneration and local delivery of insulinlike growth factor I by bioerodible polyorthoester membranes in rat calvarial defects", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.498~505 (1996)
- Wan Y, "Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose", heparin hybrid nanofiber for potential vascular tissue engineering scaffolds, 2011, pp.22, 2643~2648
- Nwe N, "Selection of a biopolymer based on attachment, morphology and proliferation of fibroblast NIH", 3T3 cells for the development of a biodegradable tissue regeneration template: Alginate, bacterial cellulose and gelatin, 2010, pp.45, 457~466
- Wan YZ, "Biomimetic synthesis of hydroxyapatite", bacterial cellulose nanocomposites for biomedical applications, 2007, pp.27, 855~864
- Müller FA, "Cellulose-based scaffold materials for cartilage tissue engineering", Biomaterials, 27, pp.3955~3963 (2006)
- Tuzlakoglu K, "Nano- and micro-fiber combined scaffolds: a new architecture for bone tissue engineering", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 16, pp.1099~1104 (2005)
- Helenius G, "In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose", J Biomed Mater Res A, 76, pp.431~438 (2006)
- Miyamoto T, "Tissue biocompatibility of cellulose and its derivatives", J Biomed Mater Res, 23, pp.125~133 (1989)
- Zellin G, "Effects of different osteopromotive membrane porosities on experimental bone neogenesis in rats", Biomaterials, 17, pp.695~702 (1996)
- Lundgren AK, "Guided jaw-bone regeneration using an experimental rabbit model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 27, pp.135~140 (1998)
- Zaborowska M, "Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration", Acta Biomater, 6, pp.2540~2547 (2010)
- Bäckdahl H, "Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells", Biomaterials, 27, pp.2141~2149 (2006)
- Fang B, "Proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on hydroxyapatite", bacterial cellulose nanocomposite scaffolds, 2009, pp.15, 1091~1098
- Fujimori E, "Ultraviolet light-induced change in collagen macromolecule", Biopolym, 3, pp.115~119 (2004)
- Rothamel D, "Biocompatibility and biodegradation of a native porcine pericardium membrane: results of in vitro and in vivo examinations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.146~154 (2012)
- Märtson M, "Is cellulose sponge degradable or stable as implantation material? An in vivo subcutaneous study in the rat", Biomaterials, 20, pp.1989~1995 (1999)
- Bottino MC, "Recent advances in the development of GTR", GBR membranes for periodontal regeneration-a materials perspective, 2012, pp.28, 703~721