Prediction of lifespan and assessing risk factors of large-sample implant prostheses: a multicenter study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose. This study aimed to analyze factors influencing the success and failure of implant prostheses and to estimate the lifespan of prostheses using standardized evaluation criteria. An online survey platform was utilized to efficiently gather large samples from multiple institutions. Materials and methods. During the one-year period, patients visiting 16 institutions were assessed using standardized evaluation criteria (KAP criteria). Data from these institutions were collected through an online platform, and various statistical analyses were conducted. Risk factors were assessed using both the Cox proportional hazard model and Cox regression analysis. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier analysis and nomogram, and lifespan prediction was performed using principal component analysis. Results. The number of patients involved in this study was 485, with a total of 841 prostheses evaluated. The median survival was estimated to be 16 years with a 95% confidence interval. Factors found to be significantly associated with implant prosthesis failure, characterized by higher hazard ratios, included the ‘type of clinic’, ‘type of antagonist’, and ‘plaque index’. The lifespan of implant prostheses that did not fail was estimated to exceed the projected lifespan by approximately 1.34 years. Conclusion. To ensure the success of implant prostheses, maintaining good oral hygiene is crucial. The estimated lifespan of implant prostheses is often underestimated by approximately 1.34 years. Furthermore, standardized form, online platform, and visualization tool, such as nomogram, can be effectively utilized in future follow-up studies.
Abstract
Purpose. This study aimed to analyze factors influencing the success and failure of implant prostheses and to estimate the lifespan of prostheses using standardized evaluation criteria. An online survey platform was utilized to efficiently gather large samples from multiple institutions. Materials and methods. During the one-year period, patients visiting 16 institutions were assessed using standardized evaluation criteria (KAP criteria). Data from these institutions were collected through an online platform, and various statistical analyses were conducted. Risk factors were assessed using both the Cox proportional hazard model and Cox regression analysis. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier analysis and nomogram, and lifespan prediction was performed using principal component analysis. Results. The number of patients involved in this study was 485, with a total of 841 prostheses evaluated. The median survival was estimated to be 16 years with a 95% confidence interval. Factors found to be significantly associated with implant prosthesis failure, characterized by higher hazard ratios, included the ‘type of clinic’, ‘type of antagonist’, and ‘plaque index’. The lifespan of implant prostheses that did not fail was estimated to exceed the projected lifespan by approximately 1.34 years. Conclusion. To ensure the success of implant prostheses, maintaining good oral hygiene is crucial. The estimated lifespan of implant prostheses is often underestimated by approximately 1.34 years. Furthermore, standardized form, online platform, and visualization tool, such as nomogram, can be effectively utilized in future follow-up studies.
참고문헌 (32)
- Helkimo E, "Chewing efficiency and state of dentition. A methodologic study", Acta Odontol Scand, 36, pp.33~41 (1978)
- Prithviraj DR, "A comparison of masticatory efficiency in conventional dentures, implant retained or supported overdentures and implant supported fixed prostheses : a literature review", J Dent Implant, 4, pp.153~ (2014)
- Schwarz MS, "Mechanical complications of dental implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.156~158 (2000)
- Schwartz NL, "Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures : lifespan and causes for loss of serviceability", J Am Dent Assoc, 81, pp.1395~1401 (1970)
- Foster LV, "Failed conventional bridge work from general dental practice : clinical aspects and treatment needs of 142 cases", Br Dent J, 168, pp.199~201 (1990)
- Valderhaug J, "A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics", Acta Odontol Scand, 49, pp.35~40 (1991)
- Papaspyridakos P, "A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.102~110 (2012)
- Di Francesco F, "The number of implants required to support a maxillary overdenture : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Prosthodont Res, 63, pp.15~24 (2019)
- Pieralli S, "Clinical outcomes of partial and fullarch all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.224~236 (2018)
- Jung RE, "Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.2~21 (2012)
- Sailer I, "Prosthetic failures in dental implant therapy", Periodontol 2000, 88, pp.130~144 (2022)
- Raikar S, "Factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants : a retrospective study", J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 7, pp.351~355 (2017)
- Lekholm U, "Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws : a 10-year prospective multicenter study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.639~645 (1999)
- Scheller H, "A 5-year multicenter study on implant-supported single crown restorations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.212~218 (1998)
- Yoon JH, "Establishment of online evaluation system for an analysis on the longevity of dental prostheses", J Korean Acad Adv Gen Dent, 8, pp.7~19 (2019)
- Yoon JH, "Korea Academy of Prosthodontics criteria for longevity studies of dental prostheses", J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 54, pp.341~353 (2016)
- "Survey for lifetime of dental prosthesis" (2017)[URL]
- Paquette DW, "Risk factors for endosseous dental implant failure", Dent Clin North Am, 50, pp.361~374 (2006)
- Kim Y, "Occlusal considerations in implant therapy : clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.26~35 (2005)
- Sheridan RA, "The role of occlusion in implant therapy : a comprehensive updated review", Implant Dent, 25, pp.829~838 (2016)
- Messori A, "Median versus mean lifetime survival in the analysis of survival data", Haematologica, 82, pp.730~ (1997)
- Kinsel RP, "Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients : patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure", J Prosthet Dent, 101, pp.388~394 (2009)
- Barker C, "The mean, median, and confidence intervals of the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate-computations and applications", The American Statistician, 63, pp.78~80 (2009)
- Ben-Aharon O, "Median survival or mean survival : which measure is the most appropriate for patients, physicians, and policymakers?", Oncologist, 24, pp.1469~1478 (2019)
- Yang JY, "Prediction models and visualizations according to outcome variables using R-focusing on regression analyses", J Health Info Stat, 47, pp.S21~S30 (2022)
- Abdi H, "Principal component analysis", Wiley interdisciplinary reviews : computational statistics, 2, pp.433~459 (2010)
- Jia L, "Construction formula of biological age using the principal component analysis", Biomed Res Int, 2016, pp.4697017~ (2016)
- Nakamura E, "Assessment of biological age by principal component analysis", Mech Ageing Dev, 46, pp.1~18 (1988)
- Mordechai F, "The effect of type of specialty(periodontology", oral surgery)on early implant failure : a retrospective"Big-Data"study from a nation-wide dental chain in Israel, 2022, pp.26, 6159~6163
- Bakker MH, "General health status of Dutch elderly receiving implant-retained overdentures : A 9-year big data cross-sectional study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 23, pp.228~235 (2021)
- Schneeweiss S, "A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics", J Clin Epidemiol, 58, pp.323~337 (2005)
- Kaplan RM, "Big data and large sample size : a cautionary note on the potential for bias", Clin Transl Sci, 7, pp.342~346 (2014)