Does the palatal vault form have an influence on the scan time and accuracy of intraoral scans of completely edentulous arches? An in-vitro study
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different palatal vault configurations on the accuracy and scan speed of intraoral scans (IO) of completely edentulous arches. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three different virtual models of a completely edentulous maxillary arch with different palatal vault heights- Cl I moderate (U-shaped), Cl II deep (steep) and Cl III shallow (flat)- were digitally designed using CAD software (Meshmixer; Autodesk, USA) and 3D-printed using SLA-based 3D-printer (XFAB; DWS, Italy) (n = 30; 10 specimens per group). Each model was scanned using intraoral scanner (Trios 3; 3Shape™, Denmark). Scanning time was recorded for all samples. Scanning accuracy (trueness and precision) were evaluated using digital subtraction technique using Geomagic Control X v2020 (Geomagic; 3DSystems, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to detect differences in scanning time, trueness and precision among the test groups. Statistical significance was set at α = .05. RESULTS. The scan process could not be completed for Class II group and manufacturer’s recommended technique had to be modified. ANOVA revealed no statistically significant difference in trueness and precision values among the test groups (P =.959 and P =.658, respectively). Deep palatal vault (Cl II) showedsignificantly longer scan time compared to Cl I and III. CONCLUSION. The selection of scan protocol in complex cases such as deep palatal vault is of utmost importance. The modified, adopted longer path scan protocol of deep vault cases resulted in increased scan time when compared to the other two groups.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different palatal vault configurations on the accuracy and scan speed of intraoral scans (IO) of completely edentulous arches. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three different virtual models of a completely edentulous maxillary arch with different palatal vault heights- Cl I moderate (U-shaped), Cl II deep (steep) and Cl III shallow (flat)- were digitally designed using CAD software (Meshmixer; Autodesk, USA) and 3D-printed using SLA-based 3D-printer (XFAB; DWS, Italy) (n = 30; 10 specimens per group). Each model was scanned using intraoral scanner (Trios 3; 3Shape™, Denmark). Scanning time was recorded for all samples. Scanning accuracy (trueness and precision) were evaluated using digital subtraction technique using Geomagic Control X v2020 (Geomagic; 3DSystems, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to detect differences in scanning time, trueness and precision among the test groups. Statistical significance was set at α = .05. RESULTS. The scan process could not be completed for Class II group and manufacturer’s recommended technique had to be modified. ANOVA revealed no statistically significant difference in trueness and precision values among the test groups (P =.959 and P =.658, respectively). Deep palatal vault (Cl II) showedsignificantly longer scan time compared to Cl I and III. CONCLUSION. The selection of scan protocol in complex cases such as deep palatal vault is of utmost importance. The modified, adopted longer path scan protocol of deep vault cases resulted in increased scan time when compared to the other two groups.
참고문헌 (22)
- Mangano A, "Conventional vs digital impressions: acceptability, treatment comfort and stress among young orthodontic patients", Open Dent J, 12, pp.118~124 (2018)
- Pan S, "Time efficiency and quality of outcomes in a model-free digital workflow using digital impression immediately after implant placement : A double-blind self-controlled clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 30, pp.617~626 (2019)
- Joda T, "Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator’s preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.1318~1323 (2017)
- AlRumaih HS, "Clinical applications of intraoral scanning in removable prosthodontics : a literature review", J Prosthodont, 30, pp.747~762 (2021)
- Patzelt SB, "Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws", J Am Dent Assoc, 144, pp.914~920 (2013)
- Schimmel M, "Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws : an in vitro analysis", Clin Oral Investig, 25, pp.1839~1847 (2021)
- Rasaie V, "Accuracy of intraoral scanners for recording the denture bearing areas : a systematic review", J Prosthodont, 30, pp.520~539 (2021)
- Bohner L, "Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: A systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.246~251 (2019)
- Tapie L, "Understanding dental CAD", CAM for restorations--accuracy from a mechanical engineering viewpoint, 2015, pp.18, 343~367
- Zhongpeng Y, "Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models : an in vivo study", BMC Oral Health, 19, pp.66~ (2019)
- Mennito AS, "Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner", J Esthet Restor Dent, 31, pp.369~377 (2019)
- Gan N, "Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions for whole upper jaws, including full dentitions and palatal soft tissues", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0158800~ (2016)
- Deferm JT, "Validation of 3D documentation of palatal soft tissue shape, color, and irregularity with intraoral scanning", Clin Oral Investig, 22, pp.1303~1309 (2018)
- Kim SJ, "The relationship between acute otitis media and the anatomic form of the hard palate", Pediatr Dent, 30, pp.9~14 (2008)
- "ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1: general principles and definitions", International Standard Organization (ISO), ~ (1994)
- Zarone F, "Comparison of different intraoral scanning techniques on the completely edentulous maxilla : An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 124, pp.762~ (2020)
- Sallorenzo A, "Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses", J Prosthet Dent (2021)
- Revilla-León M, "Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy(trueness and precision)of an intraoral scanner", J Prosthodont, 29, pp.107~113 (2020)
- Logozzo S, "Recent advances in dental optics-Part I : 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry", Opt Laser Eng, 54, pp.203~221 (2014)
- Quaas S, "Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD", CAM restorations, 2007, pp.35, 903~908
- Keul C, "Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions : an in vitro and in vivo comparison", Clin Oral Investig, 24, pp.735~745 (2020)
- Sun L, "Reproducibility of an intraoral scanner : A comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo scans", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 154, pp.305~310 (2018)