본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Four Automated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Immunoassays: ADVIA Centaur XP, ARCHITECT I2000sr, Elecsys E170, and Unicel Dxi800

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the tumor markers available for evaluating disease progression status after initial therapy and monitoring subsequent treatment modalities in colorectal, gastrointestinal, lung, and breast carcinoma. We evaluated the correlations and differences between widely used, automated CEA immunoassays at four different medical laboratories. Methods: In total, 393 serum samples with CEA ranging from 3.0 to 1,000 ng/mL were analyzed on ADVIA Centaur XP (Siemens Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA), ARCHITECT i2000sr (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA), Elecsys E170 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and Unicel DxI800 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA), and the results were compared. Deming regression, Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the data correlation and % differences among these assays. Results: Deming regression analysis of data from Elecsys E170 and UniCel DxI800 showed good correlation (y=3.1615+0.8970x). According to Bland-Altman plot, no statistically significant bias (–1.78 ng/mL [95% confidence interval: –4.02 to 0.46]) was observed between Elecsys E170 and UniCel DxI800. However, the relative differences of CEA concentrations between assays exceeded the acceptable limit of 30%. Regarding the agreement of positivity with cut-off value 5.0 ng/mL, ARCHITECT i2000sr and Elecsys E170 showed the highest agreement (95.2%), whereas ADVIA Centaur XP and ARCHITECT i2000sr showed the lowest agreement (70.7%). Conclusions: Agreements between automated CEA immunoassays are variable, and individual CEA concentrations may differ significantly between assays. Standardization of serum CEA concentrations and further harmonization are needed.

Abstract

Background: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the tumor markers available for evaluating disease progression status after initial therapy and monitoring subsequent treatment modalities in colorectal, gastrointestinal, lung, and breast carcinoma. We evaluated the correlations and differences between widely used, automated CEA immunoassays at four different medical laboratories. Methods: In total, 393 serum samples with CEA ranging from 3.0 to 1,000 ng/mL were analyzed on ADVIA Centaur XP (Siemens Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA), ARCHITECT i2000sr (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA), Elecsys E170 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and Unicel DxI800 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA), and the results were compared. Deming regression, Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the data correlation and % differences among these assays. Results: Deming regression analysis of data from Elecsys E170 and UniCel DxI800 showed good correlation (y=3.1615+0.8970x). According to Bland-Altman plot, no statistically significant bias (–1.78 ng/mL [95% confidence interval: –4.02 to 0.46]) was observed between Elecsys E170 and UniCel DxI800. However, the relative differences of CEA concentrations between assays exceeded the acceptable limit of 30%. Regarding the agreement of positivity with cut-off value 5.0 ng/mL, ARCHITECT i2000sr and Elecsys E170 showed the highest agreement (95.2%), whereas ADVIA Centaur XP and ARCHITECT i2000sr showed the lowest agreement (70.7%). Conclusions: Agreements between automated CEA immunoassays are variable, and individual CEA concentrations may differ significantly between assays. Standardization of serum CEA concentrations and further harmonization are needed.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 전병건, "Individualized Cutoff Value of the Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level is Necessary for Optimal Use as a Prognostic Marker", Annals of Coloproctolgy, 29(3), pp.106~114 (2013), 대한대장항문학회
  2. Peng Y, "Elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Ki67 is predictor of decreased survival in IIA stage colon cancer", World J Surg, 37, pp.208~213 (2013)[DOI]
  3. Sławomir Ławicki, "Plasma Levels and Diagnostic Utility of Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Matrix Metalloproteinase-9, and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-1 as New Biomarkers of Breast Cancer", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 36(3), pp.223~229 (2016), 대한진단검사의학회
  4. Kim CG, "Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level as a prognostic factor for recurrence and survival after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer", Ann Surg Oncol, 24, pp.227~235 (2017)[DOI]
  5. Maeda R, "Clinical significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer", J Thorac Dis, 9, pp.176~186 (2017)[DOI]
  6. Gold P, "Demonstration of tumor-specific antigens in human colonic carcinomata by immunological tolerance and absorption techniques", J Exp Med, 121, pp.439~462 (1965)[DOI]
  7. Saito G, "Monitoring of serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels after curative resection of colon cancer: cutoff values determined according to preoperative levels enhance the diagnostic accuracy for recurrence", Oncology, 92, pp.276~282 (2017)[DOI]
  8. 최수인, "Clinical Usefulness of Human Epididymis Protein 4 in Lung Cancer", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 37(6), pp.526~530 (2017), 대한진단검사의학회
  9. 조윤영, "Performance Evaluation of the Serum Thyroglobulin Assays With Immunochemiluminometric Assay and Immunoradiometric Assay for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 36(5), pp.413~419 (2016), 대한진단검사의학회
  10. Karen LC, ". Bethesda", pp.223~266 (2014), Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  11. W. Greg Miller, "Harmonization: the Sample, the Measurement, and the Report", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 34(3), pp.187~197 (2014), 대한진단검사의학회
  12. Matsushita H, "Establishment and evaluation of a new chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for carcinoembryonic antigen adapted to the fully automated ACCESS system", Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem, 34, pp.829~835 (1996)
  13. Akbas N, "Evaluation of Beckman Coulter DxI 800 immunoassay system using clinically oriented performance goals", Clin Biochem, 47, pp.158~163 (2014)
  14. Zhang GM, "Reference intervals of alphafetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen in the apparently healthy population", Med Sci Monit, 22, pp.4875~4880 (2016)[DOI]
  15. Zhang K, "A long way to go for the harmonization of four immunoassays for carcinoembryonic antigen", Clin Chim Acta, 454, pp.15~19 (2016)[DOI]
  16. Sturgeon C, "Standardization of tumor markers-priorities identified through external quality assessment", Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl, 245, pp.S94~S99 (2016)
  17. Twomey PJ, "How to use difference plots in quantitative method comparison studies", Ann Clin Biochem, 43, pp.124~129 (2006)[DOI]
  18. 박윤희, "Evaluation of the UniCelTM DxI 800 Immunoassay Analyzer in Measuring Five Tumor Markers", Yonsei Medical Journal, 53(3), pp.557~564 (2012), 연세대학교의과대학[DOI]
  19. Falzarano R, "Evaluation of a CLEIA automated assay system for the detection of a panel of tumor markers", Tumour Biol, 34, pp.3093~3100 (2013)[DOI]
  20. Bilic-Zulle L, "Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression", Biochem Med (Zagreb), 21, pp.49~52 (2011)
  21. Bowen RA, "Interferences from blood collection tube components on clinical chemistry assays", Biochem Med (Zagreb), 24, pp.31~44 (2014)
  22. Laurence DJ, "First British standard for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)", Br J Cancer, 32, pp.295~299 (1975)[DOI]
  23. Sorensen CG, "The diagnostic accuracy of carcinoembryonic antigen to detect colorectal cancer recurrence-A systematic review", Int J Surg, 25, pp.134~144 (2016)
  24. Bjerner J, "Reference intervals for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA125, MUC1, Alfa-foeto-protein (AFP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and CA19.9 from the NORIP study", Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 68, pp.703~713 (2008)[DOI]
  25. Qin X, "Reference intervals for serum alpha-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen in Chinese Han ethnic males from the Fangchenggang Area Male Health and Examination Survey", Int J Biol Markers, 26, pp.65~71 (2011)[DOI]
  26. Lao X, "Reference intervals for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in Guangxi Zhuang ethnic males from the FAMHES Project", Clin Lab, 62, pp.955~961 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)