한국ᆞ중국ᆞ일본 전통복식에 나타난 문양의 조형적 특성과 조형미
Formative Characteristics and Aesthetic on Pattern Featured in Korean, Chinese and Japanese Traditional Dress
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to be data and to help understanding of pattern of Korean, Chinese and Japanese traditional dress. The methods of this study are the study of academic literatures as well as practical study through the analysis of case studies about actual works. The summary of this study's results is like followings. First, standard of Pattern are nature, mam-made in motif object, Naturalistic, Geometric, Stylized,Abstract in motif express, Order, Disorder in pattern express. Second, a point of sameness of motif object in traditional dress of three nations were that nature and letter abstractive of mam-made is a lot. but motif of Japan was used in daily life motif of mam-made which was not in Korea and China Third, commonly, motif expression of three nations were developed Naturalistic, Stylized. but in Naturalistic, Korea was simple, plane, China was three-dimensional, Japan was expressed super realism. Fourth, as formative aesthetic of Pattern, Korea is natural, plane, simple and symbolic, China is gorgeous, three-dimensional, immaculacy, filling and symbolic, Japan is delicate, complicated, decoration and symbolic.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to be data and to help understanding of pattern of Korean, Chinese and Japanese traditional dress. The methods of this study are the study of academic literatures as well as practical study through the analysis of case studies about actual works. The summary of this study's results is like followings. First, standard of Pattern are nature, mam-made in motif object, Naturalistic, Geometric, Stylized,Abstract in motif express, Order, Disorder in pattern express. Second, a point of sameness of motif object in traditional dress of three nations were that nature and letter abstractive of mam-made is a lot. but motif of Japan was used in daily life motif of mam-made which was not in Korea and China Third, commonly, motif expression of three nations were developed Naturalistic, Stylized. but in Naturalistic, Korea was simple, plane, China was three-dimensional, Japan was expressed super realism. Fourth, as formative aesthetic of Pattern, Korea is natural, plane, simple and symbolic, China is gorgeous, three-dimensional, immaculacy, filling and symbolic, Japan is delicate, complicated, decoration and symbolic.
참고문헌 (25)
- 이진민, "한ᆞ일 여성복식의 현대화에 나타난 미적 특성", 박사, pp.2005
- 유현정, "패션에 나타난 한국미의 조형성과 디자인 요소", 한국의상디자인학회지, 12(1), pp.51~59 (2010), 한국의상디자인학회
- 권원순, "추상과 감정이입", pp.69~ (1982), 계명대학교 출판부
- 임영주, "한국의 전통문양", pp.27~ (2004), 대원사
- 김영자, "복식미학의 이해", pp.183~ (2004), 경춘사
- 이호정, "패션디자인", pp.116~ (2002), 교학연구사
- -문양 이미지 포지셔닝 기준 개발을 중심으로-, "복식", 2009, 29~41, pp.한국복식학회
- 라사라 교육 개발원, "복식대사전", pp.375~ (1995), 라사라 출판사
- 이은영, "복식의장학" (1997), 교문사
- 이정주, "텍스타일 기획과 디자인", pp.107~ (2000), 신광출판사
- McJimsey, H.T, "Art and Fashion in Clothing Selection", pp.175~178 (1973), Iowa State University Press
- 전천혜, "우리나라 여성 양복지 문양에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1977
- 장수경, "한국전통문양의 유형에 따른 분류에 관한 연구", 복식문화학회지, 2(2), pp.283~295 (1994)
- 장수경, "한국전통문양의 종류, 표현유형, 구성형식 및 적용대상에 따른 감성이미지와 선호도", 박사, pp.1999
- Marian L. Davis, "복식의 시각 디자인", pp.202~204 (1990), 경춘사
- 정연윤, "민속복식과 현대 패션에 나타난 전통문양의 조형적 특성 비교", 석사, pp.2008
- 김윤희, "현대 한국적 복식에 나타난 인체와 복식에 대한 미의식", 박사, pp.1998
- 백영자, "한국의 복식" (1996), 경춘사
- 왕애령, "현대 중국풍 패션에 나타난 조형적 특성에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2007
- 신민, "한ᆞ중 전통문양의 비교연구", 한국공예논총, 4(2), pp.311~322 (2001)
- 사사키 차가, "현대 패션에 표현된 일본에도시대 복식의 미적가치와 조형적 특성", 박사, pp.2009
- 이경은, "오리엔탈리즘 패션의 컬러연구", 석사, pp.2003
- 양지나, "일본 우키요에에 나타난 이미지를 통한 의상디자인 연구 - 작품에 나타난 문양을 중심으로 -", 한국의상디자인학회지, 11(2), pp.143~151 (2009), 한국의상디자인학회