본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

New Decision Criteria for Selecting Delta Check Methods Based on the Ratio of the Delta Difference to the Width of the Reference Range Can Be Generally Applicable for Each Clinical Chemistry Test Item

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background: Many laboratories use 4 delta check methods: delta difference, delta percent change, rate difference, and rate percent change. However, guidelines regarding decision criteria for selecting delta check methods have not yet been provided. We present new decision criteria for selecting delta check methods for each clinical chemistry test item. Methods: We collected 811,920 and 669,750 paired (present and previous) test results for 27 clinical chemistry test items from inpatients and outpatients, respectively. We devised new decision criteria for the selection of delta check methods based on the ratio of the delta difference to the width of the reference range (DD/RR). Delta check methods based on these criteria were compared with those based on the CV% of the absolute delta difference (ADD) as well as those reported in 2 previous studies. Results: The delta check methods suggested by new decision criteria based on the DD/RR ratio corresponded well with those based on the CV% of the ADD except for only 2 items each in inpatients and outpatients. Delta check methods based on the DD/RR ratio also corresponded with those suggested in the 2 previous studies, except for 1 and 7 items in inpatients and outpatients, respectively. Conclusions: The DD/RR method appears to yield more feasible and intuitive selection criteria and can easily explain changes in the results by reflecting both the biological variation of the test item and the clinical characteristics of patients in each laboratory. We suggest this as a measure to determine delta check methods.

Abstract

Background: Many laboratories use 4 delta check methods: delta difference, delta percent change, rate difference, and rate percent change. However, guidelines regarding decision criteria for selecting delta check methods have not yet been provided. We present new decision criteria for selecting delta check methods for each clinical chemistry test item. Methods: We collected 811,920 and 669,750 paired (present and previous) test results for 27 clinical chemistry test items from inpatients and outpatients, respectively. We devised new decision criteria for the selection of delta check methods based on the ratio of the delta difference to the width of the reference range (DD/RR). Delta check methods based on these criteria were compared with those based on the CV% of the absolute delta difference (ADD) as well as those reported in 2 previous studies. Results: The delta check methods suggested by new decision criteria based on the DD/RR ratio corresponded well with those based on the CV% of the ADD except for only 2 items each in inpatients and outpatients. Delta check methods based on the DD/RR ratio also corresponded with those suggested in the 2 previous studies, except for 1 and 7 items in inpatients and outpatients, respectively. Conclusions: The DD/RR method appears to yield more feasible and intuitive selection criteria and can easily explain changes in the results by reflecting both the biological variation of the test item and the clinical characteristics of patients in each laboratory. We suggest this as a measure to determine delta check methods.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Whitehurst P, "Evaluation of discrepancies in patients’ results--an aspect of computer-assisted quality control", Clin Chem, 21, pp.87~92 (1975)
  2. Ladenson JH, "Patients as their own controls: use of the computer to identify “laboratory error.”", Clin Chem, 21, pp.1648~1653 (1975)
  3. Wheeler LA, "Delta check tables for the Technicon SMA 6 continuous-flow analyzer", Clin Chem, 23, pp.216~219 (1977)
  4. Sheiner LB, "The performance of delta check methods", Clin Chem, 25, pp.2034~2037 (1979)
  5. Nosanchuk JS, "CUMS and delta checks. A systematic approach to quality control", Am J Clin Pathol, 62, pp.707~712 (1974)
  6. Wheeler LA, "A clinical evaluation of various delta check methods", Clin Chem, 27, pp.5~9 (1981)
  7. Lee DH, "Evaluation of the results in clinical chemistry using delta and panic value check", Korean J Lab Med, 8, pp.237~250 (1988)
  8. Kim JW, "Differential application of rate and delta check on selected clinical chemistry tests", J Korean Med Sci, 5, pp.189~195 (1990)
  9. Lacher DA, "Rate and delta checks compared for selected chemistry tests", Clin Chem, 34, pp.1966~1970 (1988)
  10. Min WK, "The development of online delta check system using the workstation", J Clin Pathol Qual Control, 18, pp.133~142 (1996)
  11. Dighe AS, "Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center", Am J Clin Pathol, 125, pp.758~764 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

Clinical Application of Overlapping Confidence Intervals for Monitoring Changes in Serial Clinical Chemistry Test Results어영, 조주영, Dong Min Seo대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2020 · 제40권 제3호Effective and Practical Complete Blood Count Delta Check Method and Criteria for the Quality Control of Automated Hematology AnalyzersCho Young-Uk, Jang Seongsoo, Kim Min-Sun, Kim Seung-Il, Namgoong Seung, Park Chan-Jeoung대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2023 · 제43권 제5호An Objective Approach to Deriving the Clinical Performance of Autoverification LimitsLim Chun Yee, Loh Tze Ping, Markus Corey, Tan Rui Zhen대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2022 · 제42권 제5호Practical Considerations for Clinical Laboratories in Top-down Approach for Assessing the Measurement Uncertainty of Clinical Chemistry Analytes전사일, Gu Hyunjung, Hong Jinyoung, Lee Juhee, Lee Woochang, Lee Woo-In, Min Won-Ki, Yun Yeo-Min대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2022 · 제42권 제6호Are Your Laboratory Data Reproducible? The Critical Role of Imprecision from Replicate Measurements to Clinical Decision-makingCoskun Abdurrahman대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2025 · 제45권 제3호Periodic Comparability Verification and Within-Laboratory Harmonization of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Results at a Large Healthcare Center With Multiple InstrumentsJun Sun-Hee, Kim Sung Min, Lee Joon Hee, Lee Kyunghoon, Nam Youngwon, Song Junghan, Song Sang Hoon대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2022 · 제42권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)