본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Theta Oscillation Related to the Auditory Discrimination Process in Mismatch Negativity: Oddball versus Control Paradigm

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background and Purpose The aim of this study was to identify the mechanism underlying the auditory discriminatory process reflected in mismatch negativity (MMN), using time-frequency analysis of single-trial event-related potentials (ERPs). Methods Two auditory tones of different probabilities (oddball paradigm) and the same probability (control paradigm) were used. The average dynamic changes in amplitude were evaluated, and the in-phase consistency of the EEG spectrum at each frequency and time window across trials, event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs), and inter-trial phase coherence (ITC)were computed. Results Subtraction of the ERPs of standard stimuli from the ERPs of deviant stimuli revealed a clear MMN component in the oddball paradigm. However, no discernible MMN component was observed in the control paradigm. Statistical tests showed that in the oddball paradigm, deviant tones produced significant increases of theta ERSPs and ITC at around 250 ms as compared with the standard tone, while no significant difference between the two stimuli was observed in the control paradigm. Conclusions Our results confirm that the auditory discriminatory process reflected in MMN is accompanied by phase resetting and power modulation at the theta frequency.

Abstract

Background and Purpose The aim of this study was to identify the mechanism underlying the auditory discriminatory process reflected in mismatch negativity (MMN), using time-frequency analysis of single-trial event-related potentials (ERPs). Methods Two auditory tones of different probabilities (oddball paradigm) and the same probability (control paradigm) were used. The average dynamic changes in amplitude were evaluated, and the in-phase consistency of the EEG spectrum at each frequency and time window across trials, event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs), and inter-trial phase coherence (ITC)were computed. Results Subtraction of the ERPs of standard stimuli from the ERPs of deviant stimuli revealed a clear MMN component in the oddball paradigm. However, no discernible MMN component was observed in the control paradigm. Statistical tests showed that in the oddball paradigm, deviant tones produced significant increases of theta ERSPs and ITC at around 250 ms as compared with the standard tone, while no significant difference between the two stimuli was observed in the control paradigm. Conclusions Our results confirm that the auditory discriminatory process reflected in MMN is accompanied by phase resetting and power modulation at the theta frequency.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Näätänen R, "Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted", Acta Psychol (Amst), 42, pp.313~329 (1978)
  2. Näätänen R, "Primitive intelligence in the auditory cortex", Trends Neurosci, 24, pp.283~288 (2001)
  3. Näätänen R, "The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review", Clin Neurophysiol, 118, pp.2544~2590 (2007)
  4. Makeig S, "Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses", Science, 295, pp.690~694 (2002)
  5. Rousselet GA, "Single-trial EEG dynamics of object and face visual processing", Neuroimage, 36, pp.843~862 (2007)
  6. Fell J, "Neural bases of cognitive ERPs: more than phase reset", J Cogn Neurosci, 16, pp.1595~1604 (2004)
  7. Mormann F, "Phase", amplitude reset and theta-gamma interaction in the human medial temporal lobe during a continuous word recognition memory task, 2005, pp.15, 890~900
  8. Hanslmayr S, "Alpha phase reset contributes to the generation of ERPs", Cereb Cortex, 17, pp.1~8 (2007)
  9. Fuentemilla L, "Theta EEG oscillatory activity and auditory change detection", Brain Res, 1220, pp.93~101 (2008)
  10. Hsiao FJ, "Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: an MEG study", Biol Psychol, 81, pp.58~66 (2009)
  11. Kimura M, "Visual mismatch negativity: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm", Psychophysiology, 46, pp.402~409 (2009)
  12. Ulanovsky N, "Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons", Nat Neurosci, 6, pp.391~398 (2003)
  13. Delorme A, "EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis", J Neurosci Methods, 134, pp.9~21 (2004)
  14. Jung TP, "Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation", Psychophysiology, 37, pp.163~178 (2000)
  15. Makeig S, "Mining event-related brain dynamics", Trends Cogn Sci, 8, pp.204~210 (2004)
  16. Onton J, "Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis", Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 30, pp.808~822 (2006)
  17. Onton J, "Frontal midline EEG dynamics during working memory", Neuroimage, 27, pp.341~356 (2005)
  18. Klimesch W, "EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis", Brain Res Brain Res Rev, 29, pp.169~195 (1999)
  19. Näätänen R, "Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence", Psychophysiology, 42, pp.25~32 (2005)
  20. Lin YY, "Plastic phase-locking and magnetic mismatch response to auditory deviants in temporal lobe epilepsy", Cereb Cortex, 17, pp.2516~2525 (2007)
  21. Doeller CF, "Prefrontal cortex involvement in preattentive auditory deviance detection: neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence", Neuroimage, 20, pp.1270~1282 (2003)
  22. Rinne T, "Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal mismatch negativity sources", Neuroimage, 12, pp.14~19 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)