본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

EEG Source Imaging in Partial Epilepsy in Comparison with Presurgical Evaluation and Magnetoencephalography

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background and Purpose Te aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of threedimensional (3D) scalp EEG source imaging (ESI) in partial epilepsy in comparison with the results of presurgical evaluation, magnetoencephalography (MEG), and electrocorticography (ECoG). Methods Te epilepsy syndrome of 27 partial epilepsy patients was determined by presurgical evaluations. EEG recordings were made using 70 scalp electrodes, and the 3D coordinates of the electrodes were digitized. ESI images of individual and averaged spikes were analyzed by Curry sofware with a boundary element method. MEG and ECoG were performed in 23 and 9 patients, respectively. Results ESI and MEG source imaging (MSI) results were well concordant with the results of presurgical evaluations (in 96.3% and 100% cases for ESI and MSI, respectively) at the lobar level. However, there were no spikes in the MEG recordings of three patients. Te ESI results were well concordant with MSI results in 90.0% of cases. Compared to ECoG, the ESI results tended to be localized deeper than the cortex, whereas the MSI results were generally localized on the cortical surface. ESI was well concordant with ECoG in 8 of 9 (88.9%) cases, and MSI was also well concordant with ECoG in 4 of 5 (80.0%) cases. Te EEG single dipoles in one patient with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy were tightly clustered with the averaged dipole when a 3 Hz high-pass flter was used. Conclusions Te ESI results were well concordant with the results of the presurgical evaluation, MSI, and ECoG. Te ESI analysis was found to be useful for localizing the seizure focus and is recommended for the presurgical evaluation of intractable epilepsy patients.

Abstract

Background and Purpose Te aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of threedimensional (3D) scalp EEG source imaging (ESI) in partial epilepsy in comparison with the results of presurgical evaluation, magnetoencephalography (MEG), and electrocorticography (ECoG). Methods Te epilepsy syndrome of 27 partial epilepsy patients was determined by presurgical evaluations. EEG recordings were made using 70 scalp electrodes, and the 3D coordinates of the electrodes were digitized. ESI images of individual and averaged spikes were analyzed by Curry sofware with a boundary element method. MEG and ECoG were performed in 23 and 9 patients, respectively. Results ESI and MEG source imaging (MSI) results were well concordant with the results of presurgical evaluations (in 96.3% and 100% cases for ESI and MSI, respectively) at the lobar level. However, there were no spikes in the MEG recordings of three patients. Te ESI results were well concordant with MSI results in 90.0% of cases. Compared to ECoG, the ESI results tended to be localized deeper than the cortex, whereas the MSI results were generally localized on the cortical surface. ESI was well concordant with ECoG in 8 of 9 (88.9%) cases, and MSI was also well concordant with ECoG in 4 of 5 (80.0%) cases. Te EEG single dipoles in one patient with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy were tightly clustered with the averaged dipole when a 3 Hz high-pass flter was used. Conclusions Te ESI results were well concordant with the results of the presurgical evaluation, MSI, and ECoG. Te ESI analysis was found to be useful for localizing the seizure focus and is recommended for the presurgical evaluation of intractable epilepsy patients.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Diekmann V, "Localisation of epileptic foci with electric, magnetic and combined electromagnetic models", Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 106, pp.297~313 (1998)
  2. Ding L, "Ictal source analysis: localization and imaging of causal interactions in humans", Neuroimage, 34, pp.575~586 (2007)
  3. Brodbeck V, "Electrical source imaging for presurgical focus localization in epilepsy patients with normal MRI", Epilepsia, 51, pp.583~591 (2010)
  4. Brodbeck V, "Electroencephalographic source imaging: a prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients", Brain, 134(10), pp.2887~2897 (2011)
  5. Lantz G, "Epileptic source localization with high density EEG: how many electrodes are needed?", Clin Neurophysiol, 114, pp.63~69 (2003)
  6. Michel CM, "128-channel EEG source imaging in epilepsy: clinical yield and localization precision", J Clin Neurophysiol, 21, pp.71~83 (2004)
  7. Sperli F, "EEG source imaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery: a new perspective in presurgical workup", Epilepsia, 47, pp.981~990 (2006)
  8. Wang G, "Interictal spike analysis of high-density EEG in patients with partial epilepsy", Clin Neurophysiol, 122, pp.1098~1105 (2011)
  9. Wennberg R, "EEG source imaging of anterior temporal lobe spikes: validity and reliability", Clin Neurophysiol, 125, pp.886~902 (2014)
  10. Yamazaki M, "Integrating dense array EEG in the presurgical evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy", ISRN Neurol, 2012, pp.924081~ (2012)
  11. Plummer C, "EEG source localization in focal epilepsy:where are we now?", Epilepsia, 49, pp.201~218 (2008)
  12. Zumsteg D, "Source localization of mesial temporal interictal epileptiform discharges: correlation with intracranial foramen ovale electrode recordings", Clin Neurophysiol, 116, pp.2810~2818 (2005)
  13. Ebersole JS, "Clinical application of dipole models in the localization of epileptiform activity", J Clin Neurophysiol, 24, pp.120~129 (2007)
  14. Gavaret M, "Source localization of scalp-EEG interictal spikes in posterior cortex epilepsies investigated by HR-EEG and SEEG", Epilepsia, 50, pp.276~289 (2009)
  15. Huppertz HJ, "Cortical current density reconstruction of interictal epileptiform activity in temporal lobe epilepsy", Clin Neurophysiol, 112, pp.1761~1772 (2001)
  16. He B, "Electric dipole tracing in the brain by means of the boundary element method and its accuracy", IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 34, pp.406~414 (1987)
  17. Herrendorf G, "Dipole-source analysis in a realistic head model in patients with focal epilepsy", Epilepsia, 41, pp.71~80 (2000)
  18. Roth BJ, "Dipole localization in patients with epilepsy using the realistically shaped head model", Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 102, pp.159~166 (1997)
  19. Gavaret M, "Electric source imaging in temporal lobe epilepsy", J Clin Neurophysiol, 21, pp.267~282 (2004)
  20. Merlet I, "Reliability of dipole models of epileptic spikes", Clin Neurophysiol, 110, pp.1013~1028 (1999)
  21. Plummer C, "Clinical utility of current-generation dipole modelling of scalp EEG", Clin Neurophysiol, 118, pp.2344~2361 (2007)
  22. Gavaret M, "Electric source imaging in frontal lobe epilepsy", J Clin Neurophysiol, 23, pp.358~370 (2006)
  23. Lantz G, "Simultaneous intracranial and extracranial recording of interictal epileptiform activity in patients with drug resistant partial epilepsy: patterns of conduction and results from dipole reconstructions", Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 99, pp.69~78 (1996)
  24. Jin K, "Neuromagnetic localization of spike sources in perilesional, contralateral mirror, and ipsilateral remote areas in patients with cavernoma", Epilepsia, 48, pp.2160~2166 (2007)
  25. Knowlton RC, "Magnetoencephalography in partial epilepsy: clinical yield and localization accuracy", Ann Neurol, 42, pp.622~631 (1997)
  26. Nakasato N, "Comparisons of MEG, EEG, and ECoG source localization in neocortical partial epilepsy in humans", Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 91, pp.171~178 (1994)
  27. Stefan H, "Clinical applications of MEG in epilepsy", Brain Topogr, 5, pp.425~427 (1993)
  28. Scherg M, "Multiple source analysis of interictal spikes:goals, requirements, and clinical value", J Clin Neurophysiol, 16, pp.214~224 (1999)
  29. Ebersole JS, "Combining MEG and EEG source modeling in epilepsy evaluations", J Clin Neurophysiol, 27, pp.360~371 (2010)
  30. Fuchs M, "Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results", Clin Neurophysiol, 115, pp.1442~1451 (2004)
  31. Rose S, "Advances in spike localization with EEG dipole modeling", Clin EEG Neurosci, 40, pp.281~287 (2009)
  32. Ebersole JS, "EEG dipole modeling in complex partial epilepsy", Brain Topogr, 4, pp.113~123 (1991)
  33. Rampp S, "On the opposition of EEG and MEG", Clin Neurophysiol, 118, pp.1658~1659 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

간질환자 두피뇌파의 발작사이간질모양방전과 배경파 델타영역: 전류원분포의 해부학적 연관성강규식, 강종수, 강희영, 권오영, 박기종, 임병훈, 정석원, 정승욱, 최낙천, 하은옥대한임상신경생리학회 · Annals of Clinical Neurophysiology2009 · 제11권 제1호Patch-based Cortical Source Modeling for EEG/MEG Distributed Source Imaging: A Simulation Study임창환대한의용생체공학회 · 의공학회지2006 · 제27권 제2호Clinical Usefulness of Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children With Focal Epilepsy권순학, 김세윤, 배현우, 변준철, 오승석, 이윤정대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2022 · 제18권 제5호Clinical Utility of Interictal High-Frequency Oscillations Recorded with Subdural Macroelectrodes in Partial Epilepsy민병훈, 주은연, 홍승봉, 홍승철, daelimkoo, Jounhong Ryan Cho대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2012 · 제8권 제1호두피전극과 경질막밑 전극으로 동시 기록한 발작기 뇌파에서의 뚜렷한 시간차이: 안쪽관자엽간질 환자 1예구대림, 변소영, 서대원, 유남태, 이정화, 주은연, 홍승봉, 홍승철, 송파멜라대한임상신경생리학회 · Annals of Clinical Neurophysiology2011 · 제13권 제2호앞관자엽극파의 쌍극자전류원: 방향의 임상적 의미강희영, 권오영, 김수경, 김영수, 박기종, 손승남, 임병훈, 정석원, 최낙천대한신경과학회 · 대한신경과학회지2011 · 제29권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)