본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Real-Life Effectiveness and Tolerability of Perampanel in Pediatric Patients Aged 4 Years or Older with Epilepsy: A Korean National Multicenter Study

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background and Purpose The US Food and Drug Administration approval for perampanel has only recently been expanded to patients as young as 4 years, and so there have been few real-life studies of the effects of perampanel in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy, factors affecting treatment response, and tolerability of perampanel as an add-on therapy in pediatric patients aged 4 years or older with epilepsy. Methods This multicenter retrospective observational study collected data from pediatric epilepsy centers of four Korean national universities. Changes in the seizure frequency from baseline, adverse events, and retention rates were obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months. Adverse events and discontinuation profiles were obtained to assess tolerability. Results This study included 220 children and adolescents (117 males and 103 females) aged 4 to 20 years. The overall response rate was 43.6%, and the seizure-freedom rate was 17.7%. Factors affecting a good treatment response were the absence of intellectual disability, small number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs, and low baseline seizure frequency. Eighty-eight patients (40%) experienced adverse events, but they mostly were of mild severity and resolved after the dose reduction or discontinuation of perampanel. The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 85.0%, 71.8%, and 50.5%, respectively. Conclusions Adjunctive treatment with perampanel was efficacious and tolerated in pediatric patients aged 4 years or older with epilepsy. Early perampanel treatment may help to reduce the burden of their seizures and improve their quality of life.

Abstract

Background and Purpose The US Food and Drug Administration approval for perampanel has only recently been expanded to patients as young as 4 years, and so there have been few real-life studies of the effects of perampanel in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy, factors affecting treatment response, and tolerability of perampanel as an add-on therapy in pediatric patients aged 4 years or older with epilepsy. Methods This multicenter retrospective observational study collected data from pediatric epilepsy centers of four Korean national universities. Changes in the seizure frequency from baseline, adverse events, and retention rates were obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months. Adverse events and discontinuation profiles were obtained to assess tolerability. Results This study included 220 children and adolescents (117 males and 103 females) aged 4 to 20 years. The overall response rate was 43.6%, and the seizure-freedom rate was 17.7%. Factors affecting a good treatment response were the absence of intellectual disability, small number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs, and low baseline seizure frequency. Eighty-eight patients (40%) experienced adverse events, but they mostly were of mild severity and resolved after the dose reduction or discontinuation of perampanel. The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 85.0%, 71.8%, and 50.5%, respectively. Conclusions Adjunctive treatment with perampanel was efficacious and tolerated in pediatric patients aged 4 years or older with epilepsy. Early perampanel treatment may help to reduce the burden of their seizures and improve their quality of life.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Bhandage AK, "AMPA, NMDA and kainate glutamate receptor subunits are expressed in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)where the expression of GluK4 is altered by pregnancy and GluN2D by depression in pregnant women", J Neuroimmunol, 305, pp.51~58 (2017)
  2. Kim HD, "Review of clinical studies of perampanel in adolescent patients", Brain Behav, 6, pp.e00505~ (2016)
  3. Henley JM, "Synaptic AMPA receptor composition in development, plasticity and disease", Nat Rev Neurosci, 17, pp.337~350 (2016)
  4. Rogawski MA, "Revisiting AMPA receptors as an antiepileptic drug target", Epilepsy Curr, 11, pp.56~63 (2011)
  5. Plosker GL, "Perampanel : as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial-onset seizures", CNS Drugs, 26, pp.1085~1096 (2012)
  6. Shih JJ, "New drug classes for the treatment of partial onset epilepsy : focus on perampanel", Ther Clin Risk Manag, 9, pp.285~293 (2013)
  7. De Liso P, "Current role of perampanel in pediatric epilepsy", Ital J Pediatr, 43, pp.51~ (2017)
  8. Swiderska N, "Effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in children, adolescents and young adults with refractory epilepsy : a UK national multicentre study", Seizure, 52, pp.63~70 (2017)
  9. Falco-Walter JJ, "The new definition and classification of seizures and epilepsy", Epilepsy Res, 139, pp.73~79 (2018)
  10. Biró A, "Effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsies : first experiences", Neuropediatrics, 46, pp.110~116 (2015)
  11. Datta AN, "Clinical experience with perampanel for refractory pediatric epilepsy in one Canadian center", J Child Neurol, 32, pp.834~839 (2017)
  12. De Liso P, "Effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsies—An Italian observational multicenter study", Epilepsy Res, 127, pp.93~100 (2016)
  13. Heyman E, "Tolerability and efficacy of perampanel in children with refractory epilepsy", Dev Med Child Neurol, 59, pp.441~444 (2017)
  14. Lagae L, "Adjunctive perampanel in adolescents with inadequately controlled partial-onset seizures : a randomized study evaluating behavior, efficacy, and safety", Epilepsia, 57, pp.1120~1129 (2016)
  15. Gidal BE, "Perampanel efficacy and tolerability with enzyme-inducing AEDs in patients with epilepsy", Neurology, 84, pp.1972~1980 (2015)
  16. Rudzinski LA, "New antiepileptic drugs : focus on ezogabine, clobazam, and perampanel", J Investig Med, 64, pp.1087~1101 (2016)
  17. Gidal BE, "Concentration-effect relationships with perampanel in patients with pharmacoresistant partial-onset seizures", Epilepsia, 54, pp.1490~1497 (2013)
  18. Kwan P, "Analysis of pooled phase III trials of adjunctive perampanel for epilepsy : impact of mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics on clinical outcomes", Epilepsy Res, 117, pp.117~124 (2015)
  19. Tsai JJ, "Perampanel, an AMPA receptor antagonist : from clinical research to practice in clinical settings", Acta Neurol Scand, 137, pp.378~391 (2018)
  20. Coyle H, "Clinical experience with perampanel : focus on psychiatric adverse effects", Epilepsy Behav, 41, pp.193~196 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

Five-Year Retention of Perampanel and Polytherapy Patterns: 328 Patients From a Single Center in South Korea주건, 박경일, 손효신, 이상건, 정기영, 황성은대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2023 · 제19권 제4호Effects of Perampanel on Seizure Control, Cognition, Behavior, and Psychological Status in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic ReviewChung Yao Hsu, Poyin Huang, Yi-On Fong, Yuan-Han Yang대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2022 · 제18권 제6호Seizure Aggravation Following Adjunctive Levetiracetam Therapy in Children with Epilepsy: a Single Tertiary Center Experience공주현, 김영미, 남상욱, 연규민, 윤리라, 이윤진대한소아신경학회 · 대한소아신경학회지2017 · 제25권 제3호Adverse Events During Perampanel Adjunctive Therapy in Intractable Epilepsy강훈철, 고아라, 김세희, 김흥동, 윤송이, 이선호, 이영목, 이준수대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2018 · 제14권 제3호난치성 전신성 뇌전증에서 루피나마이드의 효용성과 안전성황희, 김기중, 김존수, 김헌민, 류혜원, 변성환, 유일한, 임병찬, 채종희, 최지은, 홍원기, 황용승대한소아신경학회 · 대한소아신경학회지2012 · 제20권 제3호소아기 발병 난치성 뇌전증 환자에서 Rufinamide의 효용성과 안전성고태성, 김민지, 안현지, 염미선, 예혜련대한소아신경학회 · 대한소아신경학회지2017 · 제25권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)