Predicting Sumatriptan Responsiveness Based on Structural Connectivity in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Migraine
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background and Purpose We aimed to determine whether structural brain connectivity is significantly associated with the response to sumatriptan in patients with migraine. Methods We retrospectively enrolled patients with newly diagnosed migraine who underwent brain diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) at the time of diagnosis, with regular follow-up for at least 6 months after the initial diagnosis. Patients were classified into good- and poor-responder groups according to their response to sumatriptan. We analyzed the structural connectivity using DTI by applying graph theory using DSI Studio software. Results We enrolled 59 patients (35 good responders and 24 poor responders) and 30 healthy controls. Global structural connectivity differed significantly between patients with migraine and healthy controls, while local structural connectivity differed significantly between good and poor responders. The betweenness centrality was lower in good responders than in poor responders in the left lateral geniculate thalamic nucleus (26.078 vs. 41.371, p=0.039) and right medial mediodorsal magnocellular thalamic nucleus (60.856 vs. 90.378, p=0.021), whereas was higher in good responders in the left lateral pulvinar thalamic nucleus (98.365 vs. 50.347, p=0.003) and right medial pulvinar thalamic nucleus (216.047 vs. 156.651, p=0.036). Conclusions We found that structural connectivity in patients with migraine differed from that in healthy controls. Moreover, the local structural connectivity varied with the response to sumatriptan, which suggests that structural connectivity is a useful factor for predicting how a patient will respond to sumatriptan.
Abstract
Background and Purpose We aimed to determine whether structural brain connectivity is significantly associated with the response to sumatriptan in patients with migraine. Methods We retrospectively enrolled patients with newly diagnosed migraine who underwent brain diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) at the time of diagnosis, with regular follow-up for at least 6 months after the initial diagnosis. Patients were classified into good- and poor-responder groups according to their response to sumatriptan. We analyzed the structural connectivity using DTI by applying graph theory using DSI Studio software. Results We enrolled 59 patients (35 good responders and 24 poor responders) and 30 healthy controls. Global structural connectivity differed significantly between patients with migraine and healthy controls, while local structural connectivity differed significantly between good and poor responders. The betweenness centrality was lower in good responders than in poor responders in the left lateral geniculate thalamic nucleus (26.078 vs. 41.371, p=0.039) and right medial mediodorsal magnocellular thalamic nucleus (60.856 vs. 90.378, p=0.021), whereas was higher in good responders in the left lateral pulvinar thalamic nucleus (98.365 vs. 50.347, p=0.003) and right medial pulvinar thalamic nucleus (216.047 vs. 156.651, p=0.036). Conclusions We found that structural connectivity in patients with migraine differed from that in healthy controls. Moreover, the local structural connectivity varied with the response to sumatriptan, which suggests that structural connectivity is a useful factor for predicting how a patient will respond to sumatriptan.
참고문헌 (38)
- Ashina M, "Migraine : epidemiology and systems of care", Lancet, 397, pp.1485~1495 (2021)
- Lipton RB, "Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States : data from the American Migraine Study II", Headache, 41, pp.646~657 (2001)
- GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators, "Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016", Lancet Neurol, 17, pp.954~976 (2018)
- Charles A, "Vasodilation out of the picture as a cause of migraine headache", Lancet Neurol, 12, pp.419~420 (2013)
- Burstein R, "Deconstructing migraine headache into peripheral and central sensitization", Pain, 89, pp.107~110 (2001)
- Bolay H, "Intrinsic brain activity triggers trigeminal meningeal afferents in a migraine model", Nat Med, 8, pp.136~142 (2002)
- Charles A, "Targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide : a new era in migraine therapy", Lancet, 394, pp.1765~1774 (2019)
- Hamel E, "Serotonin and migraine : biology and clinical implications", Cephalalgia, 27, pp.1293~1300 (2007)
- Chong CD, "Migraine and posttraumatic headache : similarities and differences in brain network connectivity", Semin Neurol, 42, pp.441~448 (2022)
- de Tommaso M, "Pain-related brain connectivity changes in migraine : a narrative review and proof of concept about possible novel treatments interference", Brain Sci, 11, pp.234~ (2021)
- Park S, "Brain networks in migraine with and without aura : an exploratory arterial spin labeling MRI study", Acta Neurol Scand, 145, pp.208~214 (2022)
- Ashina M, "Migraine : integrated approaches to clinical management and emerging treatments", Lancet, 397, pp.1505~1518 (2021)
- Marmura MJ, "The acute treatment of migraine in adults : the american headache society evidence assessment of migraine pharmacotherapies", Headache, 55, pp.3~20 (2015)
- Silberstein SD, "Multispecialty consensus on diagnosis and treatment of headache", Neurology, 54, pp.1553~ (2000)
- Christoph-Diener H, "Predicting the response to sumatriptan : the Sumatriptan Naratriptan Aggregate Patient database", Neurology, 63, pp.520~524 (2004)
- Goadsby PJ, "Early vs. non-early intervention in acute migraine-‘Act when Mild(AwM)’. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of almotriptan", Cephalalgia, 28, pp.383~391 (2008)
- Derry CJ, "Sumatriptan(all routes of administration)for acute migraine attacks in adults-overview of Cochrane reviews", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, pp.CD009108~ (2014)
- Derry CJ, "Sumatriptan(subcutaneous route of administration)for acute migraine attacks in adults", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, pp.CD009665~ (2012)
- Hens M, "Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of oral triptan therapy for migraine in four European countries", Eur J Health Econ, 15, pp.433~437 (2014)
- Arnold M, "Headache classification committee of the international headache society(IHS)the international classification of headache disorders", Cephalalgia, 38, pp.1~211 (2018)
- Hernandez MV, "Factors associated with longterm retention of treatment with golimumab in a real-world setting : an analysis of the Spanish BIOBADASER registry", Rheumatol Int, 39, pp.509~515 (2019)
- Leroux E, "Evaluation of patients with insufficient efficacy and", or tolerability to triptans for the acute treatment of migraine : a systematic literature review, 2020, pp.37, 4765~4796
- Mijalkov M, "BRAPH : a graph theory software for the analysis of brain connectivity", PLoS One, 12, pp.e0178798~ (2017)
- Rolls ET, "Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3", Neuroimage, 206, pp.116189~ (2020)
- 박경민, "Pivotal Role of Subcortical Structures as a Network Hub in Focal Epilepsy: Evidence from Graph Theoretical Analysis Based on Diffusion-Tensor Imaging", Journal of Clinical Neurology, 15(1), pp.68~76 (2019), 대한신경과학회[DOI]
- Farahani FV, "Application of graph theory for identifying connectivity patterns in human brain networks : a systematic review", Front Neurosci, 13, pp.585~ (2019)
- Guye M, "Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional connectivity MRI in normal and pathological brain networks", MAGMA, 23, pp.409~421 (2010)
- DeSouza DD, "Altered structural brain network topology in chronic migraine", Brain Struct Funct, 225, pp.161~172 (2020)
- de Tommaso M, "Brain networking analysis in migraine with and without aura", J Headache Pain, 18, pp.98~ (2017)
- Yang Y, "Identifying functional brain abnormalities in migraine and depression comorbidity", Quant Imaging Med Surg, 12, pp.2288~2302 (2022)
- Soheili-Nezhad S, "Structural and functional reorganization of the brain in migraine without aura", Front Neurol, 10, pp.442~ (2019)
- Qin ZX, "Altered resting-state functional connectivity between subregions in the thalamus and cortex in migraine without aura", Eur J Neurol, 27, pp.2233~2241 (2020)
- Younis S, "Current understanding of thalamic structure and function in migraine", Cephalalgia, 39, pp.1675~1682 (2019)
- Chen ZH, "The brain structure and function abnormalities of migraineurs : a systematic review and neuroimaging meta-analysis", Front Neurol, 13, pp.1022793~ (2022)
- Wei HL, "Impaired intrinsic functional connectivity between the thalamus and visual cortex in migraine without aura", J Headache Pain, 20, pp.116~ (2019)
- Shin KJ, "Alterations of individual thalamic nuclei volumes in patients with migraine", J Headache Pain, 20, pp.112~ (2019)
- Park KM, "Predicting the antiepileptic drug response by brain connectivity in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy", J Neurol, 267, pp.1179~1187 (2020)
- Tepper SJ, "Variability in recurrence rates with acute treatments for migraine : why recurrence is not an appropriate outcome measure", J Headache Pain, 23, pp.148~ (2022)