본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Short-Term Complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy according to the Type of Technique

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류소아과학

초록

Purpose: The method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement can be divided into the pull and introducer techniques. We compared short-term complications and prognosis between patients who underwent the pull technique and two other types of introducer techniques, the trocar introducer technique and T-fastener gastropexy technique. Methods: Twenty-six patients who underwent PEG were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively investigated the age, sex, body weight, weight-for-age Z-score, underlying diseases, PEG indications, complications, duration of NPO (nil per os), pain control frequency, and duration of antibiotic therapy. The patients were classified into three groups according to the PEG technique. The occurrence of complications was monitored for 10 weeks after the procedure. Results: The age, sex, body weight, and weight-for-age Z-score were not significantly between the three groups. Most patients had cerebral palsy and seizure disorders. Dysphagia was the most common indication for PEG. Major complications occurred in 5 (50%), 4 (66.7%), and 0 (0%) patients in group I, II, and III, respectively (p=0.005). Further, peristomal infection requiring systemic antibiotic therapy occurred in 2 (20%), 3 (50%), and 0 (0%) patients in group I, II, and III, respectively (p=0.04). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to minor complications, duration of NPO, pain control frequency, and duration of antibiotic therapy. Conclusion: The results indicate that the T-fastener gastropexy technique was associated with the lowest rate of major complications.

Abstract

Purpose: The method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement can be divided into the pull and introducer techniques. We compared short-term complications and prognosis between patients who underwent the pull technique and two other types of introducer techniques, the trocar introducer technique and T-fastener gastropexy technique. Methods: Twenty-six patients who underwent PEG were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively investigated the age, sex, body weight, weight-for-age Z-score, underlying diseases, PEG indications, complications, duration of NPO (nil per os), pain control frequency, and duration of antibiotic therapy. The patients were classified into three groups according to the PEG technique. The occurrence of complications was monitored for 10 weeks after the procedure. Results: The age, sex, body weight, and weight-for-age Z-score were not significantly between the three groups. Most patients had cerebral palsy and seizure disorders. Dysphagia was the most common indication for PEG. Major complications occurred in 5 (50%), 4 (66.7%), and 0 (0%) patients in group I, II, and III, respectively (p=0.005). Further, peristomal infection requiring systemic antibiotic therapy occurred in 2 (20%), 3 (50%), and 0 (0%) patients in group I, II, and III, respectively (p=0.04). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to minor complications, duration of NPO, pain control frequency, and duration of antibiotic therapy. Conclusion: The results indicate that the T-fastener gastropexy technique was associated with the lowest rate of major complications.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Abuksis G, "Outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): comparison of two policies in a 4-year experience", Clin Nutr, 23, pp.341~346 (2004)
  2. Gauderer MW, "Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique", J Pediatr Surg, 15, pp.872~875 (1980)
  3. Ponsky JL, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a nonoperative technique for feeding gastrostomy", Gastrointest Endosc, 27, pp.9~11 (1981)
  4. El-Matary W, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children", Can J Gastroenterol, 22, pp.993~998 (2008)
  5. Lynch CR, "Prevention and management of complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes", Pract Gastroenterol, 28, pp.66~76 (2004)
  6. Lee SP, "Risk factors for complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy", Dig Dis Sci, 59, pp.117~125 (2014)
  7. Russell TR, "Percutaneous gastrostomy. A new simplified and cost-effective technique", Am J Surg, 148, pp.132~137 (1984)
  8. Campoli PM, "Assessment of safety and feasibility of a new technical variant of gastropexy for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: an experience with 435 cases", BMC Gastroenterol, 9, pp.48~ (2009)
  9. Terry NE, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with T-bar fixation in children and infants", Surg Endosc, 22, pp.167~170 (2008)
  10. Fox VL, "Complications following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and subsequent catheter replacement in children and young adults", Gastrointest Endosc, 45, pp.64~71 (1997)
  11. Fortunato JE, "Outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children and young adults", J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 50, pp.390~393 (2010)
  12. Köhler G, "Comparison of 231 patients receiving either "pull-through" or "push" percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy", Surg Endosc (2014)
  13. Liu R, "Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic, laparoscopic and open gastrostomy insertion in children", Pediatr Surg Int, 29, pp.613~621 (2013)
  14. Ljungdahl M, "Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial", Surg Endosc, 20, pp.1248~1251 (2006)
  15. Pennington C, "To PEG or not to PEG", Clin Med, 2, pp.250~255 (2002)
  16. Lim CH, "Successful control of peristomal infection by introducer-type percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a retrospective historical control study", Dig Dis Sci, 56, pp.2024~2029 (2011)
  17. Martins FP, "New "introducer" PEG-gastropexy with T fasteners: a pilot study", Arq Gastroenterol, 48, pp.231~235 (2011)
  18. Shigoka H, "Comparison of modified introducer method with pull method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy:prospective randomized study", Dig Endosc, 24, pp.426~431 (2012)
  19. Maetani I, "PEG with introducer or pull method: a prospective randomized comparison", Gastrointest Endosc, 57, pp.837~841 (2003)
  20. Campoli PM, "Effect of the introducer technique compared with the pull technique on the peristomal infection rate in PEG: a meta-analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.988~996 (2012)
  21. Tucker AT, "'Push' versus 'pull' percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancer", Laryngoscope, 113, pp.1898~1902 (2003)
  22. Taylor CA, "Predictors of outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a community-based study", Mayo Clin Proc, 67, pp.1042~1049 (1992)
  23. Brewster BD, "Prospective determination of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complication rates in children: still a safe procedure", Surgery, 152, pp.714~719 (2012)
  24. Gauderer MW, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy:a 10-year experience with 220 children", J Pediatr Surg, 26, pp.288~292 (1991)
  25. Khattak IU, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in paediatric practice: complications and outcome", J Pediatr Surg, 33, pp.67~72 (1998)
  26. Avitsland TL, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: a safe technique with major symptom relief and high parental satisfaction", J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 43, pp.624~628 (2006)
  27. Vervloessem D, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children is not a minor procedure:risk factors for major complications", Semin Pediatr Surg, 18, pp.93~97 (2009)
  28. Van Biervliet S, "Gastrostomy use in children: a 3-year single centre experience", Acta Gastroenterol Belg, 77, pp.8~12 (2014)
  29. Fröhlich T, "Review article: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants and children", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 31, pp.788~801 (2010)
  30. Lipp A, "Systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (4), pp.CD005571~ (2006)
  31. Jafri NS, "Meta-analysis: antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent peristomal infection following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 25, pp.647~656 (2007)
  32. Lipp A, "A systematic review of prophylactic antimicrobials in PEG placement", J Clin Nurs, 18, pp.938~948 (2009)
  33. Choudhry U, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized prospective comparison of early and delayed feeding", Gastrointest Endosc, 44, pp.164~167 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Surgical Gastrostomy in Severely Handicapped Children김준, 이민, 김선준, 김순철, 주찬웅대한소아소화기영양학회 · Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition2017 · 제20권 제1호Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Associated with Pull-Type and Introducer-Type Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomies임현, 김도훈, 김진호, 송호준, 안지용, 이신원, 이정훈, 이진혁, 정훈용, 조형진, 최귀숙, 최기돈, 하연정대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2014 · 제47권 제6호Infant Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: Risks or Benefits?Andrea Zanini, Anna Morandi, Ernesto Leva, Francesco Macchini, Giorgio Farris, Giorgio Fava, Giulia Brisighelli, Valerio Gentilino대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2018 · 제51권 제3호Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Reduces Major Complications in High-Risk Pediatric PatientsAnna Rieth, Brigitta Balogh, Dániel Szűcs, Gabriella Gavallér, Tamás Kovács대한소아소화기영양학회 · Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition2021 · 제24권 제3호소아에서 경피 내시경하 위루술의 임상적 고찰김재영, 박재홍, 최광해, 최병호대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2005 · 제31권 제5호Single Center Experience with Gastrostomy Insertion in Pediatric Patients: A 10-Year Review고홍, 김승, 김지영, 박선영, 장은영대한소아소화기영양학회 · Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition2017 · 제20권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)