본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evaluation of Environmental Factors to Determine the Distribution of Functional Feeding Groups of Benthic Macroinvertebrates Using an Artificial Neural Network

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류생물학

초록

Functional feeding groups (FFGs) of benthic macroinvertebrates are guilds of invertebrate taxa that obtain food in similar ways, regardless of their taxonomic affinities. They can represent a heterogeneous assemblage of benthic fauna and may indicate disturbances of their habitats. The proportion of different groups can change in response to disturbances that affect the food base of the system, thereby offering a means of assessing disruption of ecosystem functioning. In this study, we used benthic macroinvertebrate communities collected at 650 sites of 23 different water types in the province of Overijssel, The Netherlands. Physical and chemical environmental factors were measured at each sampling site. Each taxon was assigned to its corresponding FFG based on its food resources. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) using a backpropagation algorithm, a supervised artificial neural network, was applied to evaluate the influence of environmental variables to the FFGs of benthic macroinvertebrates through a sensitivity analysis. In the evaluation of input variables, the sensitivity analysis with partial derivatives demonstrates the relative importance of influential environmental variables on the FFG, showing that different variables influence the FFG in various ways. Collector-filterers and shredders were mainly influenced by Ca²+ and width of the streams, and scrapers were influenced mostly with Ca²+ and depth, and predators were by depth and pH. Ca²+ and depth displayed relatively high influence on all four FFGs, while some variables such as pH, %gravel, %silt, and %bank affected specific groups. This approach can help to characterize community structure and to ecologically assess target ecosystems.

Abstract

Functional feeding groups (FFGs) of benthic macroinvertebrates are guilds of invertebrate taxa that obtain food in similar ways, regardless of their taxonomic affinities. They can represent a heterogeneous assemblage of benthic fauna and may indicate disturbances of their habitats. The proportion of different groups can change in response to disturbances that affect the food base of the system, thereby offering a means of assessing disruption of ecosystem functioning. In this study, we used benthic macroinvertebrate communities collected at 650 sites of 23 different water types in the province of Overijssel, The Netherlands. Physical and chemical environmental factors were measured at each sampling site. Each taxon was assigned to its corresponding FFG based on its food resources. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) using a backpropagation algorithm, a supervised artificial neural network, was applied to evaluate the influence of environmental variables to the FFGs of benthic macroinvertebrates through a sensitivity analysis. In the evaluation of input variables, the sensitivity analysis with partial derivatives demonstrates the relative importance of influential environmental variables on the FFG, showing that different variables influence the FFG in various ways. Collector-filterers and shredders were mainly influenced by Ca²+ and width of the streams, and scrapers were influenced mostly with Ca²+ and depth, and predators were by depth and pH. Ca²+ and depth displayed relatively high influence on all four FFGs, while some variables such as pH, %gravel, %silt, and %bank affected specific groups. This approach can help to characterize community structure and to ecologically assess target ecosystems.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. Allan JD, "Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters" (2007), Springer, Dordrecht
  2. Allan JD, "Feeding habits and prey consumption of three setipalpian stoneflies (Plecoptera) in a mountain stream", Ecology, 63, pp.26~34 (1982)
  3. Balls G-R, "Investigating microclimatic influences on ozone injury in clover (Trifolium subterraneum) using artificial neural networks", New Phytologist, 132, pp.271~280 (1996)
  4. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition, "Barbour MT", Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water, ~, pp.EPA 841-B-99-002 (1999)
  5. Brittain JE, "A review of the effect of river regulation on mayflies (Ephemeroptera)", Reg Riv Res Manage, 3, pp.191~204 (1989)
  6. Callisto M, "Categorização funcional dos macroinvertebrados bentônicos em quarto ecossistemas lóticos sob influência das atividades de umamineração de bauxita na amazônia central (Brasil)", Oecologia Brasiliensis, 5, pp.223~234 (1998)
  7. Callisto M, "Habitat diversity and benthic functional trophic groups at Serra Do Cipo, Southeast Brazil", Rev Brasil Biol, 61(2), pp.259~266 (2001)
  8. Chon T-S, "Use of an artificial neural network to predict population dynamics of the forest-pest pine needle gall midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiida)", Environ Entomol, 29, pp.1208~1215 (2000)
  9. Cummins KW, "Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates", Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 10, pp.147~172 (1979)
  10. Cummins KW, "The natural stream ecosystem. In: The Ecology of Regulated Streams", pp.7~24 (1979), Plenum Press
  11. Dimopoulos I, "Neural network models to study relationships between lead concentration in grasses and permanent urban descriptors in Athens city (Greece)", Ecol Model, 120, pp.157~165 (1999)
  12. Dimopoulos Y, "Use of some sensitivity criteria for choosing networks with good generalisation ability", Neural Process Lett, 2, pp.1~4 (1995)
  13. Feminella JW, "Hydrologic influences, disturbance, and intraspecific competition in a stream caddisfly population", Ecology, 71, pp.2083~2094 (1990)
  14. Furse MT, "The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination and classification of running water sites in Great Britain, and on the prediction of their macroinvertebrate communities", Freshwat Biol, 14, pp.257~280 (1984)
  15. Garson GD, "Interpreting neural network connection weights", Artificial Intel Expert, 6, pp.47~51 (1991)
  16. Gevrey M, "Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models", Ecol Model, 160, pp.249~264 (2003)
  17. Gevrey M, "Predicting Dutch macroinvertebrate species richness and functional feeding groups using five modelling techniques. In: Modelling Community Structure in Freshwater Ecosystems" (2005), Springer
  18. Goh ATC, "Back-propagation neural networks for modelling complex systems", Artificial Intel Eng, 9, pp.143~151 (1995)
  19. Hart DD, "Resource limitation in a stream community: Phosphorous enrichment effects on periphyton and grazers", Ecology, 71, pp.1494~1502 (1990)
  20. Hawkins CP, "Evaluation of the use of landscape classifications for the prediction of freshwater biota: synthesis and recommendations", J N Am Benthol Soc, 19, pp.541~556 (2000)
  21. Haykin S, "Neural Networks" (1994), MacMillian College Publishing Company
  22. Hellawell JM, "Biological Surveillance of Rivers. Water Research Center" (1978), Stevenage Laboratory
  23. Hershey AE, "Nutrient influence on a stream grazer: orthocladius microcommunities respond to nutrient input", Ecology, 69, pp.1383~1392 (1988)
  24. Jørgensen SE, "Explanation of the observed structure of functional feeding groups of aquatic macro-invertebrates by an ecological and the maximum exergy principle", Ecol Model, 158, pp.223~231 (2002)
  25. Kung SY, "Digital Neural Networks" (1993), Prentice Hall
  26. Legendre P, "Numerical Ecology" (1998), Elsevier
  27. Lek S, "Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology", Ecol Model, 90, pp.39~52 (1996)
  28. Lek S, "Artificial Neuronal Networks: Application to Ecology and Evolution" (2000), Springer-Verlag
  29. Lek S, "Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling an introduction", Ecol Model, 120, pp.65~73 (1999)
  30. Lek S, "Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology", ~ (2005)
  31. Lenat DR, "Water quality assessment of streams using a qualitative collection method for benthic macroinvertebrates", J N Am Benthol Soc, 7, pp.222~233 (1988)
  32. Levin SA, "The problem of pattern and scale in ecology", Ecology, 73, pp.1943~1967 (1992)
  33. Liong SY, "River stage forecasting in Bangladesh: neural network approach", J. Comput. Civil Eng, 14, pp.1~8 (2000)
  34. MacArthur RH, "Patterns of species diversity", Biol Rev, 40, pp.510~533 (1965)
  35. Maier HR, "The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters", Water Resour Res, 32, pp.1013~1022 (1996)
  36. Malmqvist B, "The influence of substrate stability on the composition of stream benthos: an experimental study", Oikos, 48, pp.33~38 (1987)
  37. McCallum H, "Population Parameters. Estimation for Ecological Models" (2000), Blackwell Science
  38. Mihuc TB, "The functional trophic role of lotic primary consumers: generalist versus specialist strategier", Freshwater Biol, 37, pp.455~462 (1997)
  39. Olden JD, "Illuminating the "black box": understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks", Ecol Model, 154, pp.135~150 (2002)
  40. Olden JD, "An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data", Ecol Model, 178, pp.389~397 (2004)
  41. Olden JD, "A species-specific approach to modelling biological communities and its potential for conservation", Conserv Biol, 17, pp.854~863 (2003)
  42. Park Y-S, "Biologically-inspired machine learning implemented to ecological informatics", Ecol Model, 203, pp.1~7 (2007)
  43. Park Y-S, "Sensitivity analysis and stability patterns of two-species pest models using artificial neural networks", Ecol Model, 204, pp.427~438 (2007)
  44. Paruelo JM, "Prediction of functional characteristics of ecosystems: a comparison of artificial neural networks and regression models", Ecol Model, 98, pp.173~186 (1997)
  45. Recknagel F, "Artificial neural network approach for modelling and prediction of algal blooms", Ecol Model, 96, pp.11~28 (1997)
  46. Resh VH, "Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates", pp.195~233 (1993), Chapman & Hall
  47. Rosenberg DM, "Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Invertebrates" (1993), Chapman and Hall
  48. Rumelhart DE, "Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. I. Foundations", pp.318~362 (1986), MIT Press
  49. Scardi M, "Developing an empirical model of phytoplankton primary production: a neural network case study", Ecol Model, 120, pp.213~223 (1999)
  50. Skelton PH, "Patterns of distribution and conservation status of freshwater fishes in South Africa", South Africa J Zool, 30, pp.71~81 (1995)
  51. Smith MJ, "AusRivAs: using macroinvertevrates to assess ecological conditions of rivers in Western Australia", Fresh Biol, 41, pp.269~282 (1999)
  52. TNRCC, "Receiving Water Assessment Procedures Manual" (1999), Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
  53. Turner MG, "Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity" (1991), Springer-Verlag
  54. Vannote RL, "The river continuum concept", Can J Fish Aqua Sci, 37, pp.130~137 (1980)
  55. Verdonschot PFM, "Typology of macrofaunal assemblages applied to water and nature management: a Dutch approach. In: Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters", pp.241~262 (2000), Freshwater Biological Association
  56. Wallace JB, "The role of filter feeders in flowing waters", ~ (1977)
  57. Ward JV, "Ecological factors controlling stream zoobenthos with emphasis on thermal modification of regulated streams. In: The ecology of regulated streams", pp.35~55 (1979), Plenum Press
  58. Ward JV, "The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. In: Dynamics of lotic ecosystems", pp.29~42 (1983), Ann Arbor Sci
  59. Wiggins GB, "Some relationships between systematic and trophic ecology in Nearctic aquatic insects, with special reference to Trichoptera", Ecology, 59, pp.1211~1220 (1978)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)