본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

생식세포, 배아에 대한 쟁점사항 및 입법논의

Issues on the Human Embryo, Human eggs and Human sperms and the Related Laws

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

Human Embryo means a vertebrate at any stage of development prior to birth or hatching, and the developing human individual from the time of implantation to the end of the eighth week after conception. Eggs are to live human eggs, including cells of the female germ line at any stage of maturity, but not including eggs that are in the process of fertilization or are undergoing any other process capable of resulting in an embryo, and sperm are to live human sperm, including cells of the male germ line at any stage of maturity. Most embryonic stem cells are derived from embryos that develop from eggs that have been fertilized in vitro—in an in vitro fertilization clinic—and then donated for research purposes with informed consent of the donors. They are not derived from eggs fertilized in a woman's body. The embryos from which human embryonic stem cells are derived are typically four or five days old and are a hollow microscopic ball of cells called the blastocyst. But research on human embryonic stem cells has generated much interest and public debate. In the case of embryonic stem cell research, the end that scientists hope to achieve is the relief of human suffering. That this is a humanitarian and worthy end is not in dispute. The controversy is about the means, namely, the consumption of donated embryos. the Holy See of the Roman Catholic is unequivocal in its opposition to the use of embryos as means. For one who holds that we should treat every embryo as a person for purposes of the duty not to kill, embryo-destructive experiments could gain justification only if it were argued that it is sometimes permissible to kill some persons in order to help other persons, and that is an uphill argument within any moral view. According to Bioethics and Biosafety Act in Korea, no one shall produce embryos other than for the purpose of pregnancy. In producing embryos for the purpose of pregnancy, no one shall perform any of the following acts: 1. Fertilizing an oocyte, when the oocyte and/or sperm have been specially selected for the purpose of producing offspring of a particular gender; 2. Fertilizing an oocyte, when the oocyte and/or sperm are those of a non-living human; or 3. Fertilizing an oocyte, when the oocyte and/or sperm are those of an under-aged human. However, this shall be allowed when married under-aged parents wish to conceive a child. No one shall induce or assist in providing or utilizing sperm or eggs for the purpose of receiving financial reward, property, or any other personal benefits. Payments to woman providing eggs should be fair and not so substantial that they become undue inducements that will lead donors to discount risks. to discourage improper decisions to donate eggs, programs should adopt an effective information disclosure and counseling process. Regardless of how prospective donors are recruited, programs should be ensure that they receive accurate and meaningful information on the potential physical, psychological, and legal effects of eggs retrieval and donation. But there are no regulations on the storage, disposal and donation of gamets. Though belated, government should strive actively to solve the matter and should be planning to enact the related laws.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. John T. Noonan, "의료윤리-삶과 죽음, 그 영원한 숙제" (1982), 연세대학교 출판부
  2. 구인회, "착상전 배아진단 문제 중심으로 살펴본 배아연구의 윤리적 문제점", 신학과 사상, 45 (2003)
  3. 권복규, "생명윤리와 법" (2006), 이화여자대학교 출판부
  4. 김상득, "생명의료 윤리학", pp.99~ (2000), 철학과 현실사
  5. 김일수, "배아 생명에 대한 법적 이해와 법정책의 방향", 형사정책연구, 13(3), pp.1~24 (2002), 한국형사정책연구원
  6. 홍석영, "인간배아의 인격 지위에 관한 고찰", 생명윤리, 3(3) (2002), 한국생명윤리학회
  7. Allse R. Panitch, "The Davis Dielema: How to Prevent Battles Over Frozen Preembryos", CASE W. RES. L. REV., 41(1), pp.543~579 (1991)
  8. American Fertility Society, "Ethical Statement on In Vitro Fertilization", FERTULITY AND STERILITY, 41(12) (1984)
  9. Andre P. Rose, "Reproductive Misconception: why Cloning is not just another Assisted Reproductive Technology", Duke Law Journal (1997)
  10. Bonnicksen, "Embryo Freezing : Ethical Issues in Clinical Setting", 18 Hastings Center Report, Dec, ~ (1988)
  11. David B Rensilk, "The Commodification of Human Reproductive Materials", East Carolina University, USA, Journal of Medical Ethics, 24 (1998)
  12. Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society, "Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies", Fertility & Sterility, 46(1) (1986)
  13. Gregory E. Pence, "의료윤리", pp.241~ (2003)
  14. Janna C. Merrick, "Reproductive Issues in America" (2003), ABC-CLIO, Inc
  15. Jeniffer L, "Davis v. Davis: An Inconsistent Exception to an Otherwise Sound Rule Advancing Procreational Freedom and Reproductive Technology", DEPAUL L. REV, 43 (1994)
  16. Jeniffer Marigliano Dehmel, "Note, To Have or Not to Have: Whose Procreative Rights Prevail in Disputes over Dispositions of Frozen Embryo?", CONN. L. REV, 27, pp.1377~ (1995)
  17. John A. Robertson, "In the Beginning: the Legal Status of Early Embryo", Virginia Law Review April, ~ (1990)
  18. John A.Robertson, "In the Beginning: the Legal Status of Early Embryo", Virginia Law Review April, ~ (1990)
  19. John Harris, "Clone, Genes and Immortality" (1998), Oxford University Press
  20. Kayhan Parsi, "Metaphorical Imagination: The Moral and Legal Status pf Fetuses and Embryos", Depaul Journal of Health Care Law (1999)
  21. Mailee R. Harris, "Stem Cell and the States: Promulgating Constitutional Bans on Embryonic Experimentation", Valparaiso University Law Review (2002)
  22. Marry Anne Warren, "On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion, in Thomas Mappes and Jane Zembaty" (1981), McGraw-Hill
  23. Michal Tooley, "Personhood in A Companion to Bioethics" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
  24. National Bioethics Advisory Commission, "Human Stem cell research and Potential for Clinical Application", Ethical issues in Human Stem Cell Research(volume 1), ~ (1999)
  25. Patrica A. Martin, "The Human Pre-Embryo, the Progenitor, and the State: Toward a Dynamic Theory of Status, Rights, and Research Policy", High Tech. L. J, 257(5)
  26. Philip E. Devine, "The Species Principle and Potentionality Principke, in Bioethics: Readings and Cases 136" (1987), Prentice-Hall
  27. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilization and Embryology, , Warnock Committee Report, ~ (1984)
  28. Robert J Muller, "The Applicability of Privacy and Property Rights to the Disposition of Frozen Preembryos in Intra Famillial Disputes", U. TOL. L. REV., 24
  29. The Report of The President's Council on Bioethics, "Human Cloning and Human Dignity" (2002), Public Affairs

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)