본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Potential risky exotic fish species, their ecological impacts and potential reasons for invasion in Korean aquatic ecosystems

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류생물학

초록

Background: Due to the rapidly changing climatic conditions, South Korea faces the grand challenge of exotic species. With the increasing human movement, the influx of alien species to novel regions is prevalent across the globe. The latest research suggests that it is easy to prevent the introduction and establishment of alien species rather than controlling their spread and eradication. Like other countries, the Korean Ministry of Environment released a list (in 2018) of 45 potential risky exotic fish species considered likely to be invasive candidate fish species if they ever succeed in entering the Korean aquatic ecosystems. Results: The investigation into the invasion suitability traits showed that potential risky fish species could utilize those features in becoming invasive once they arrive in the Korean aquatic ecosystems. If the novel species establish viable populations, they are likely to incur higher economic costs, damage the native aquatic fauna and flora, and jeopardize the already perilled species. Furthermore, they can damage the installed infrastructure, decline overall abundance and biodiversity, and disturb the ecosystem services. Here we reviewed the list of fish species concerning their family, native origin, preferred aquatic biomes, main food items, current status in Korea, and potential threats to humans and the ecosystems. Data shows that most species are either already designated as invasive in the neighboring counties, including Japan, Vietnam, Thailand, and China, or originate from these countries. Such species have a higher climate match with the Korean territories. Conclusions: Therefore, it is exceptionally essential to study their most critical features and take regulatory measures to restrict their entry. The incoming fish species must be screened before letting them in the country in the future. The regulatory authorities must highlight the threatening traits of such species and strictly monitor their entrance. Detailed research is required to explore the other species, especially targeting the neighboring countries fish biodiversity, having demonstrated invasive features and matching the Korean climate.

Abstract

Background: Due to the rapidly changing climatic conditions, South Korea faces the grand challenge of exotic species. With the increasing human movement, the influx of alien species to novel regions is prevalent across the globe. The latest research suggests that it is easy to prevent the introduction and establishment of alien species rather than controlling their spread and eradication. Like other countries, the Korean Ministry of Environment released a list (in 2018) of 45 potential risky exotic fish species considered likely to be invasive candidate fish species if they ever succeed in entering the Korean aquatic ecosystems. Results: The investigation into the invasion suitability traits showed that potential risky fish species could utilize those features in becoming invasive once they arrive in the Korean aquatic ecosystems. If the novel species establish viable populations, they are likely to incur higher economic costs, damage the native aquatic fauna and flora, and jeopardize the already perilled species. Furthermore, they can damage the installed infrastructure, decline overall abundance and biodiversity, and disturb the ecosystem services. Here we reviewed the list of fish species concerning their family, native origin, preferred aquatic biomes, main food items, current status in Korea, and potential threats to humans and the ecosystems. Data shows that most species are either already designated as invasive in the neighboring counties, including Japan, Vietnam, Thailand, and China, or originate from these countries. Such species have a higher climate match with the Korean territories. Conclusions: Therefore, it is exceptionally essential to study their most critical features and take regulatory measures to restrict their entry. The incoming fish species must be screened before letting them in the country in the future. The regulatory authorities must highlight the threatening traits of such species and strictly monitor their entrance. Detailed research is required to explore the other species, especially targeting the neighboring countries fish biodiversity, having demonstrated invasive features and matching the Korean climate.

참고문헌 (78)

  1. Al-Chokhachy R, "Impacts of nonnative Brown Trout on Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout in a tributary stream", N Am J Fish Manag, 39(1), pp.17~28 (2019)[DOI]
  2. Alexander ME, "Existing and emerging high impact invasive species are characterized by higher functional responses than natives", Biol Lett, 10(2), pp.20130946~ (2014)[DOI]
  3. Atique U, "Linking weir imprints with riverine water chemistry, microhabitat alterations, fish assemblages, chlorophyll-nutrient dynamics, and ecological health assessments", Ecol Indic, 117, pp.106652~ (2020)[DOI]
  4. Risk assessment models for establishment of exotic vertebrates in Australia and New Zealand, "Bomford M", Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, ~ (2008)
  5. Brenton-Rule E, "Improving management of invasive species : New Zealand’s approach to pre-and post-border pests", Policy Q, 12(1), pp.17~25 (2016)[DOI]
  6. Bzoma S, "Great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) diet in the Gulf of Gdansk in 1998", Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Functioning of coastal ecosystems in various geographical regions (2001), Institute of Oceanography, University of Gdańsk
  7. Cambray JA, "Impact on indigenous species biodiversity caused by the globalisation of alien recreational freshwater fisheries", Hydrobiologia, 500(1), pp.217~230 (2003)[DOI]
  8. Chan J, "Invasive species trait-based risk assessment for non-native freshwater fishes in a tropical city basin in Southeast Asia", PLoS One, 16(3), pp.e0248480~ (2021)[DOI]
  9. Closs GP, "Controlling European perch (Perca fluviatilis): lessons from an experimental removal", Managing invasive freshwater fish in New Zealand proceedings of a workshop hosted by department of conservation, pp.37~48 (2003), New Zealand Department of Conservation
  10. Copp GH, "Speaking their language-development of a multilingual decision-support tool for communicating invasive species risks to decision makers and stakeholders", Environ Model Softw, 135, pp.104900~ (2021)[DOI]
  11. Corkum LD, "The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, a fish invader on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean", Biol Invasions, 6(2), pp.173~181 (2004)[DOI]
  12. Crystal-Ornelas R, "Economic costs of biological invasions within North America", NeoBiota, 67, pp.485~510 (2021)[DOI]
  13. Cucherousset J, "Ecological impacts of nonnative freshwater fishes", Fisheries, 36(5), pp.215~230 (2011)[DOI]
  14. Cuthbert RN, "Are the “100 of the world’s worst” invasive species also the costliest?", Biol Invasions (2021)[DOI]
  15. Davidson A, "Fish and fish dishes of Laos", Imprimerie Nationale, ~ (1975)
  16. Diagne C, "High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide", Nature, 592(7855), pp.571~576 (2021)[DOI]
  17. Dudgeon D, "Freshwater biodiversity : importance, threats, status and conservation challenges", Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, 81(2), pp.163~182 (2006)[DOI]
  18. Emery-Butcher HE, "The impacts of invasive ecosystem engineers in freshwaters : a review", Freshw Biol, 65(5), pp.999~1015 (2020)[DOI]
  19. "FishBase" (2011)[URL]
  20. "Morone americana" (2008)[URL]
  21. Fuller PL, "Invasive species: vectors and management strategies", pp.123~134 (2003), Island Press
  22. "GB non-native species information portal" (2016)[URL]
  23. Gederaas L, "Alien species in Norway - with the Norwegian Black List 2012", The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, ~ (2012)
  24. Gnaedinger RH, "Thiaminase activity in fish : an improved assay method", Fish Ind Res, 2, pp.55~59 (1964)
  25. Gozlan RE, "Introduction of non-native freshwater fish : is it all bad?", Fish Fish, 9(1), pp.106~115 (2008)[DOI]
  26. An assessment of the potential use of Gambusia for mosquito control in Michigan, "Haas RC", Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division, ~, pp.Technical Report 2003-2 (2003)
  27. Haubrock PJ, "Two centuries for an almost complete community turnover from native to non-native species in a riverine ecosystem", Glob Change Biol, 27(3), pp.606~623 (2021)[DOI]
  28. Haubrock PJ, "Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe", Neo-Biota, 67, pp.153~190 (2021)[DOI]
  29. Herke SW, "Molecular confirmation of hybridization between northern pike (Esox lucius ) and chain pickerel (E. niger)", Copeia, 1990(3), pp.846~850 (1990)[DOI]
  30. Hughes RM, "Patterns in catch per unit effort of native prey fish and alien piscivorous fish in 7 Pacific Northwest USA rivers", Fisheries, 37(5), pp.201~211 (2012)[DOI]
  31. International Union for Conservation of Nature(IUCN), "UCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species", Species Survival Commission, ~ (2000)
  32. Jang MH, "The current status of the distribution of introduced fish in large river systems of South Korea", Int Rev Hydrobiol, 87, pp.319~328 (2002)[DOI]
  33. Jarić I, "Crypticity in biological invasions", Trends Ecol Evol, 34(4), pp.291~302 (2019)[DOI]
  34. Johannsson OE, "State of Lake Ontario: past, present and future", pp.221~256 (2003), Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management Society
  35. 길지현, "침입외래생물의 사전예방 제도 및 개선방향", 생태와 환경, 47(4), pp.239~246 (2014), 한국수생태학회
  36. 김창기, "일본과 유럽의 침입외래생물 생태계위해성평가 기법", Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure, 2(3), pp.191~197 (2015), 응용생태공학회
  37. Kim JJ, "Key drivers influencing the presence and absence of Micropterus salmoides and their effect on native fish communities and biotic integrity", Water, 13(23), pp.3430~ (2021)[DOI]
  38. Kim JJ, "Long-term ecological health assessment of a restored urban stream based on chemical water quality, physical habitat conditions and biological integrity", Water, 11(1), pp.114~ (2019)[DOI]
  39. Kim JY, "Relative abundance and invasion dynamics of alien fish species linked to chemical conditions, ecosystem health, native fish assemblage, and stream order", Water, 13(2), pp.158~ (2021)[DOI]
  40. Kottelat M, "Handbook of European freshwater fishes" (2007), Publications Kottelat
  41. Lake MD, "Consumption of submerged aquatic macrophytes by rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus L.) in New Zealand", Hydrobiologia, 470, pp.13~22 (2002)[DOI]
  42. Leunda PM, "Feeding habits of the exotic black bullhead Ameiurus melas(Rafinesque)in the Iberian Peninsula : first evidence of direct predation on native fish species", J Fish Biol, 73(1), pp.96~114 (2008)[DOI]
  43. Leung B, "An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure : bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species", Proc Biol Sci, 269(1508), pp.2407~2413 (2002)[DOI]
  44. Liang XF, "The role of sense organs in the feeding behaviour of Chinese perch", J Fish Biol, 52(5), pp.1058~1067 (1998)[DOI]
  45. Luque GM, "The 100th of the world’s worst invasive alien species", Biol Invasions, 16(5), pp.981~985 (2014)[DOI]
  46. Madenjian CP, "Adverse effects of alewives on Laurentian Great Lakes fish communities", N Am J Fish Manag, 28(1), pp.263~282 (2008)[DOI]
  47. Md. Mamun, "Distribution pattern prediction of an invasive alien species largemouth bass using a maximum entropy model (MaxEnt) in the Korean peninsula", Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 11(4), pp.516~524 (2018), 국립중앙과학관
  48. Martino A, "Is European catfish a threat to eels in southern France?", Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst, 21(3), pp.276~281 (2011)[DOI]
  49. Counting the cost : impact of invasive animals in Australia, "McLeod R", Pest Animal Control CRC, ~ (2004)
  50. Miller P, "The freshwater fishes of Europe. Vol. 8, 1, mugilidae, atherinidae, atherinopsidae, blenniidae, odontobutidae, gobiidae 1", pp.135~156 (2003), AULA-Verlag
  51. Ministry of Environment notification, "Designation and notification of alert species", Ministry of Environment, ~ (2017)
  52. Mollot G, "The effects of invasive species on the decline in species richness : a global meta-analysis", Adv Ecol Res, 56, pp.61~83 (2017)[DOI]
  53. Moyle PB, "Inland fishes of California" (1976), University of California Press
  54. Müller T, "First record of natural hybridization between pikeperch Sander lucioperca and Volga pikeperch S. volgensis", J Appl Ichthyol, 26(3), pp.481~484 (2010)[DOI]
  55. "Mylopharyngodon piceus (Richardson, 1846)" (2011)[URL]
  56. Olden JD, "Long-term trends of native and non-native fish faunas in the American Southwest", Anim Biodivers Conserv, 28(1), pp.75~89 (2005)
  57. Pyšek P, "Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species", Biol Rev, 95(6), pp.1511~1534 (2020)[DOI]
  58. Pyšek P, "A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems : the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment", Glob Change Biol, 18(5), pp.1725~1737 (2012)[DOI]
  59. Quinn SP, "Stomach contents of flathead catfish in the Flint River, Georgia", Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies, 41, pp.85~92 (1987)
  60. Ray S, "Role of shrimp farming in socio-economic elevation and professional satisfaction in coastal communities", Aquac Rep, 20, pp.100708~ (2021)[DOI]
  61. Introduced aquatic vertebrates in the Chiricahua region: effects on declining native ranid frogs, Biodiversity and management of the Madrean Archipelago: the sky islands of southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico, "Rosen PC", U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 251~261, pp.General Technical Report RM-GTR-264 (1995)
  62. Sardain A, "Global forecasts of shipping traffic and biological invasions to 2050", Nat Sustain, 2(4), pp.274~282 (2019)[DOI]
  63. SCBD(Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity), "Global biodiversity outlook 4", Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, ~ (2014)
  64. Schultz K, "Ken Schultz’s field guide to freshwater fish" (2004), Wiley
  65. Seebens H, "Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050", Glob Chang Biol, 27(5), pp.970~982 (2021)[DOI]
  66. Seebens H, "Global rise in emerging alien species results from increased accessibility of new source pools", Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115(10), pp.E2264~73 (2018)[DOI]
  67. Segev O, "Deleterious effects by mosquitofish(Gambusia affinis)on the endangered fire salamander(Salamandra infraimmaculata)", Anim Conserv, 12(1), pp.29~37 (2009)[DOI]
  68. 손승훈, "Current status of alert alien species management for the establishment of proactive management systems in Korea", Journal of Ecology and Environment, 45(4), pp.237~254 (2021), 한국생태학회[DOI]
  69. Townsend CR, "Individual, population, community, and ecosystem consequences of a fish invader in New Zealand streams", Conserv Biol, 17(1), pp.38~47 (2003)
  70. US Department of Agriculture, "Federal noxious weed list", US Department of Agriculture, ~ (2010)
  71. Vitousek PM, "Introduced species : a significant component of human-caused global change", N Z J Ecol, 21(1), pp.1~16 (1997)
  72. Vitule JRS, "Introduction of non-native freshwater fish can certainly be bad", Fish Fish, 10(1), pp.98~108 (2009)[DOI]
  73. Welcomme RL, "International introductions of inland aquatic species", Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, ~ (1988)
  74. Wells L, "Effects of alewife predation on zooplankton populations in Lake Michigan", Limnol Oceanogr, 15(4), pp.556~565 (1970)[DOI]
  75. Weyl OLF, "Fish distributions in the Rondegat River, Cape Floristic Region, South Africa, and the immediate impact of rotenone treatment in an invaded reach", African J Aquat Sci, 38(2), pp.201~209 (2013)[DOI]
  76. Whitmore DH, "Introgressive hybridization of smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui ) and Guadalupe bass (M. treculi)", Copeia, 1983(3), pp.672~679 (1983)[DOI]
  77. Xu H, "An inventory of invasive alien species in China", NeoBiota, 15, pp.1~26 (2012)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)