To Button or Not to Button? Primary Gastrostomy Tubes Offer No Significant Advantage Over Buttons
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Outcomes between primary gastrostomy tubes and buttons (G-tube and G-button) have not been established in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that primary G-tube have decreased complications when compared to G-button. Methods: A retrospective review of surgically placed gastrostomy devices from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Data collected included demographics, outcomes and 90-day complications. We divided the patients into primary G-tube and primary G-button. Results: Of 265 patients, 142 (53.6%) were male. Median age and weight at the time of surgery were 7 months (interquartile range [IQR], 2–44 months) and 6.70 kg (IQR, 3.98–14.15 kg), respectively. Among the groups, G-tube had 80 patients (30.2%) while G-button 185 patients (69.8%). There were 153 patients with at least one overall complication within 90 days postoperative. There was no significant difference in overall complications between groups (G-tube 63.8% vs. G-button 55.7%, p=0.192). More importantly, there were no significant differences in major complications among the groups, G-tube vs. G-button (5% vs. 4%; p=0.455). Conclusion: Primary G-tube offers no significant advantage in overall, minor or major complications when compared to primary G-button.
Abstract
Purpose: Outcomes between primary gastrostomy tubes and buttons (G-tube and G-button) have not been established in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that primary G-tube have decreased complications when compared to G-button. Methods: A retrospective review of surgically placed gastrostomy devices from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Data collected included demographics, outcomes and 90-day complications. We divided the patients into primary G-tube and primary G-button. Results: Of 265 patients, 142 (53.6%) were male. Median age and weight at the time of surgery were 7 months (interquartile range [IQR], 2–44 months) and 6.70 kg (IQR, 3.98–14.15 kg), respectively. Among the groups, G-tube had 80 patients (30.2%) while G-button 185 patients (69.8%). There were 153 patients with at least one overall complication within 90 days postoperative. There was no significant difference in overall complications between groups (G-tube 63.8% vs. G-button 55.7%, p=0.192). More importantly, there were no significant differences in major complications among the groups, G-tube vs. G-button (5% vs. 4%; p=0.455). Conclusion: Primary G-tube offers no significant advantage in overall, minor or major complications when compared to primary G-button.
참고문헌 (14)
- Akay B, "Gastrostomy tube placement in infants and children : is there a preferred technique?", J Pediatr Surg, 45, pp.1147~1152 (2010)
- Khattak IU, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in paediatric practice : complications and outcome", J Pediatr Surg, 33, pp.67~72 (1998)
- Franken J, "Efficacy and adverse events of laparoscopic gastrostomy placement in children : results of a large cohort study", Surg Endosc, 29, pp.1545~1552 (2015)
- Jones VS, "Laparoscopic gastrostomy : the preferred method of gastrostomy in children", Pediatr Surg Int, 23, pp.1085~1089 (2007)
- Merli L, "Gastrostomy placement in children : percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or laparoscopic gastrostomy?", Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 26, pp.381~384 (2016)
- Wragg RC, "Gastrostomy insertion in the 21st century: PEG or laparoscopic? Report from a large single-centre series", Pediatr Surg Int, 28, pp.443~448 (2012)
- Petrosyan M, "Laparoscopic gastrostomy is superior to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in children less than 5 years of age", J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 26, pp.570~573 (2016)
- Villalona GA, "Modified laparoscopic gastrostomy technique reduces gastrostomy tract dehiscence", J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 21, pp.355~359 (2011)
- Sullivan PB, "Impact of gastrostomy tube feeding on the quality of life of carers of children with cerebral palsy", Dev Med Child Neurol, 46, pp.796~800 (2004)
- Pemberton J, "Gastrostomy matters--the impact of pediatric surgery on caregiver quality of life", J Pediatr Surg, 48, pp.963~970 (2013)
- Rothenberg SS, "A safer and simpler technique", Surg Endosc, 13, pp.995~997 (1999)
- Novotny NM, "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy buttons in children: superior to tubes", J Pediatr Surg, 44, pp.1193~1196 (2009)
- Evans JS, "Should single-stage PEG buttons become the procedure of choice for PEG placement in children?", Gastrointest Endosc, 64, pp.320~324 (2006)[DOI]
- AntonoffMB, "Modified approach to laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement minimizes complications", Pediatr Surg Int, 25, pp.349~353 (2009)