Developing a Corporate Social Responsibility Scale of Individual Stakeholder's Perception
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
While many scales have been developed to measure the performance of corporate social responsibility (CSR), most are largely focused on measuring only the final outcome of CSR activities. However, regardless of how successful a CSR activity in terms of social impact, if a corporation is perceived to have ulterior motives or employ unethical methods in its execution by its stakeholders, individual stakeholders’ evaluation of its CSR outcome will likely suffer. Present research argues that because existing scales do not incorporate motivation or execution process into measuring CSP, it is difficult to clearly measure the impact of CSR on corporate performance. To mitigate this critical limitation in existing Corporate Social Performance(CSP) scales, present research proposes a new 45-item scale that incorporates motivation, execution methods and performance evaluation of CSR activities to measure the performance of CSR activities. CSR motivation is categorized into economic and profit-seeking dimensions, CSR process into legal and ethical execution and CSR into maximizing profit, employee welfare and social wealth to yield an integrated process of model evaluating CSR.
Abstract
While many scales have been developed to measure the performance of corporate social responsibility (CSR), most are largely focused on measuring only the final outcome of CSR activities. However, regardless of how successful a CSR activity in terms of social impact, if a corporation is perceived to have ulterior motives or employ unethical methods in its execution by its stakeholders, individual stakeholders’ evaluation of its CSR outcome will likely suffer. Present research argues that because existing scales do not incorporate motivation or execution process into measuring CSP, it is difficult to clearly measure the impact of CSR on corporate performance. To mitigate this critical limitation in existing Corporate Social Performance(CSP) scales, present research proposes a new 45-item scale that incorporates motivation, execution methods and performance evaluation of CSR activities to measure the performance of CSR activities. CSR motivation is categorized into economic and profit-seeking dimensions, CSR process into legal and ethical execution and CSR into maximizing profit, employee welfare and social wealth to yield an integrated process of model evaluating CSR.
참고문헌 (27)
- Abbott, W. F., "On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility : Self-reported Disclosure as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement", Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), pp.501~515 (1979)
- Barich, H., "A Framework for Marketing Image Management", Sloan Management Review, 32(2), pp.94~104 (1991)
- Becker-Olsen, K. L., "The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility On Consumer Behavior", Journal of Business Research, 59(1), pp.46~53 (2006)
- Bowen, H. R., "Social Responsibilities of the Businessman" (1953), Harper and Row
- Brown, T., "The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses", Journal of Marketing, 61, pp.68~84 (1997)
- Carroll, A. B., "A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance", Academy of Management Review, 4(4), pp.497~505 (1979)
- Carroll, A. B., "The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakehold", Business Horizons, pp.39~48 (1991)
- Churchill, G. A. JR., "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs", Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), pp.64~73 (1979)
- Davenport, K., "Corporate Citizenship : A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing It", Business and Society, 39(2), pp.210~219 (2000)
- David, P., "Corporate Social Responsibility Practices, Corporate Identity, and Purchase Intention : A Dual-Process Model", Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(3), pp.291~313 (2005)
- Davis, K., "The Case For and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities", Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), pp.312~322 (1973)
- Dichter, E., "What’s In An Image", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2(1), pp.75~81 (1985)
- Folkes, V. S., "Effects of Information About Firms' Ethical and Unethical Actions on Consumers' Attitudes", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), pp.243~259 (1999)
- Fornell, C., "Structural Equation Models with Unobservable variables And Measurement Error : Algebra and statistics", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), pp.382~388 (1981)
- Freeman, R. E., "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory : Some Future Directions", Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), pp.409~429 (1994)
- Friedman, M., "Capitalism and Freedom" (1962), University of Chicago Press
- Klein, J., "Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers' Attributions and Brand Evaluations in a Product–harm Crisis", International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), pp.203~217 (2004)
- Maignan, I., "Nature of Corporate Responsibilities Perspectives from American, French, and German Consumers", Journal of Business Research, 56(1), pp.55~67 (2003)
- Maignan, I., "Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing : An Integrative Framework", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), pp.3~19 (2003)
- Mattingly, J. E., "Measurement of Corporate Social Action : Discovering Taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini Ratings Data", Business and Society, 45(1), pp.20~46 (2006)
- Mitnick, B. M., "Commitment, Revelation, and the Testaments of Belief : The Metrics of Measurement of Corporate Social Performance", Business and Society, 39(4), pp.419~465 (2000)
- Nguyen, Nha, "Image and Reputation of Higher Education Institutions in Students’ Retention Decisions", International Journal of Educational Management, 15(6), pp.303~311 (2001)
- Schwartz, M. S., "Corporate Social Responsibility : A Three-domain Approach", Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), pp.503~530 (2003)
- Sen, S., "Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility", Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), pp.225~243 (2001)
- van de Ven, B., "Strategic and Moral Motivation for Corporate Social Responsibility", Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22, pp.111~123 (2006)
- Wartick, S., "The Evolution of Corporate Social Performance Model", Academy of Management Review, 10(10), pp.758~769 (1985)
- Wood, D. J., "Corporate Social Performance Revisited", Academy of Management Review, 16(4), pp.691~718 (1991)