본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고객-기업간 관계유형이 고객만족도 조사 참여시 제공된 보상에 대한 반응에 미치는 영향

Customer Response to Customer Satisfaction Survey Participation

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

기업이 고객에게 제공한 보상에 대한 소비자 반응을 다룬 선행 연구들은 주로 자기지각 개념 혹은 설득지식에 초점을 두고 있다. 이러한 선행연구와 관점을 달리하여 본 저자는 고객-기업간 관계성격을 중심으로 고객만족도 조사 참여시 제공되는 보상에 대한 소비자 반응을 탐구하고자 하였다. 즉, 관계 유형 문헌에서 분류하고 있는 교환관계와 공동체적 관계가 갖고 있는 관계규범의 인식차이가 고객만족도 조사 참여시 제공되는 보상에 대한 반응에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 시나리오를 바탕으로 한 실험결과에 의하면, 고객만족도 조사 참여시 보상이 제공되면 기업과 교환관계에 놓인 소비자의 경우 기업에 대한 충성도가 높아지는 반면(vs. 무보상), 공동체적 관계에 놓인 소비자의 경우 오히려 기업에 대한 충성도가 낮아지는 것으로 나타났다. 아울러 이러한 결과는 관계유형에 따라 관계 규범을 달리 지각하기 때문인 것임을 매개분석을 통해 알 수 있었다. 이로써 고객만족도 조사에 참여했을 때 제공된 보상에 대한 반응으로써 충성도는 관계유형에 따라 달라질 수 있고 관계규범에 순응하는 정도가 중요한 역할을 함을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 관계유형에 대한 기존 연구결과를 확장하고, 마케팅 상황에 적용함으로써 기업이 고객에게 실시하는 고객만족도 조사 참여 및 보상에 대한 소비자 반응에 대해서 좀 더 폭넓게 살펴보았다. 정리하면, 관계유형을 고려하여 보상에 대한 소비자 반응과 관련한 새로운 관점을 제시하고자 하였고, 고객만족도 조사에서의 관계규범의 매개효과를 살펴보았다는 점에 의의가 있다고 생각된다. 더불어 고객만족도 조사와 관련하여 더 많은 연구를 할 수 있는 가능성도 제시할 수 있었다.

Abstract

Previous studies related to customer's response to rewards which companies provide consumers mainly focus on self-perception theory or persuasion knowledge, the author pays attention to the customer's response to reward depending on relationship type and examines the interaction effects. The author suggests that relationship type between customer and company could play an important role in the influence of the reward on loyalty when participating a customer satisfaction survey. Drawing upon relationship norm theory, hypothesis 1 posits that participants in an exchange relationship will show greater loyalty given a reward than not given a reward, whereas those in a communal relationship will show lower loyalty given a reward than not given a reward when participating a customer satisfaction survey. Because each relationship has a different schema of relationship norm. The result of Experiment supports my expectation. That is, the company loyalty of participants in an exchange relationship was significantly higher when the reward was provided(vs. no reward), whereas that of participants in a communal relationship showed the opposite pattern when participating a customer satisfaction survey. In addition, the effects were also found to be caused by perceived relationship norm conformity(H2). In conclusion, customer's loyalty to the reward depends on relationship type when participating the customer satisfaction survey and the relationship norm conformity plays an important role in the effect. The research findings provide knowledge for better understanding of relationship type and extend its theory to the area of customer satisfaction survey in marketing. It needs to divide the relationship among customer, company, and salesperson and distinguish them. And also, it would be interesting to consider the valence of evaluation(e.g., compliment vs. criticize) and examine the interaction effect. In conclusion, the author presents a new perspective for the response of reward and apply it to marketing area using relationship type. And also the author testified the mediation effect of relational norm in the customer satisfaction survey. Therefore it has the potential to develop more in customer satisfaction survey.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 류강석, "보상된 구전에 대한 소비자반응에 관한 연구: 브랜드강도,유대강도, 그라고 보상배분방식의 역할을 중심으로", 마케팅연구, 19(3), pp.113~136 (2004), 한국마케팅학회
  2. 서문식, "서비스 제공자와 개인 고객 간의 관계 벨로시티: 관계시점별 종단 접근", 마케팅연구, 30(2), pp.1~26 (2015), 한국마케팅학회
  3. 이광희, "공공기관 고객만족도의 측정과 활용: 만족의 불연속 개념을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 39(4), pp.105~124 (2005), 한국행정학회
  4. 이학식, "고객만족도 측정 : NCSI와 KCSI의 평가와 새로운 지수개발 방안", 마케팅연구, 20(3), pp.137~160 (2005), 한국마케팅학회
  5. Aggarwal, P., "The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior", Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), pp.87~101 (2004)
  6. Algoe, S. B., "Beyond Reciprocity : Gratitude and Relationships in Everyday Life", Emotion, 8(3), pp.425~429 (2008)
  7. Bartlett, M. Y., "Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior Helping When it Costs You", Psychological Science, 17(4), pp.319~325 (2006)
  8. Batson, C. D., "Communal and Exchange Relationships : What is the Difference?", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), pp.677~683 (1993)
  9. Bem, D. J., "Self-Perception Theory", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, pp.1~62 (1972)
  10. Campbell, M. C., "When Attention-Getting Advertising Tactics Elicit Consumer Inferences of Manipulative Intent : The Importance of Balancing Benefits and Investments", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), pp.225~254 (1995)
  11. Campbell, M. C., "Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge : The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent", Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), pp.69~83 (2000)
  12. Chan, E., "Insincere Flattery actually Works : A Dual Attitudes Perspective", Journal of Marketing Research, 47(1), pp.122~133 (2010)
  13. Clark, M. S., "Interpersonal Attraction in Exchange and Communal Relationships", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), pp.12~24 (1979)
  14. Clark, M. S., "The Difference between Communal and Exchange Relationships : What it is and is Not", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), pp.684~691 (1993)
  15. Dahl, D. W., "Three Rs of Interpersonal Consumer Guilt : Relationship, Reciprocity, Reparation", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), pp.307~315 (2005)
  16. Deci, E. L., "Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), pp.105~115 (1971)
  17. Dodson, J. A., "Impact of Deals and Deal Retraction on Brand Switching", Journal of Marketing Research, pp.72~81 (1978)
  18. Feldman, J. M, "Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior", Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), pp.421~435 (1988)
  19. Festinger, L., "Cognitive Consequences of Forced Compliance", The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), pp.203~210 (1959)
  20. Fiske, A. P., "The Four Elementary Forms of Sociality : Framework for a Unified Theory of Social Relations", Psychological Review, 99(4), pp.689~723 (1992)
  21. Forehand, M. R., "Extending Overjustification : The Effect of Perceived Reward-Giver Intention on Response to Rewards", Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), pp.919~931 (2000)
  22. Frenzen, J., "Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market Information", Journal of Consumer Research, pp.360~375 (1993)
  23. Friestad, M., "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts", Journal of Consumer Research, pp.1~31 (1994)
  24. Hansen, R. A., "A Self-Perception Interpretation of the Effect of Monetary and Nonmonetary Incentives on Mail Survey Respondent Behavior", Journal of Marketing Research, pp.77~83 (1980)
  25. Keh, H. T., "Do Reward Programs Build Loyalty for Services?: The Moderating Effect of Satisfaction on Type and Timing of Rewards", Journal of Retailing, 82(2), pp.127~136 (2006)
  26. Kelley, H. H., "The Processes of Causal Attribution", American Psychologist, 28(2), pp.107~128 (1973)
  27. Kirmani, A., "Vigilant Against Manipulation : The Effect of Regulatory Focus on the Use of Persuasion Knowledge", Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), pp.688~701 (2007)
  28. Lepper, M. R., "Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Children: Detrimental Effects of Superfluous Social Controls", Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (1981)
  29. Liu, W., "Bringing Us Together or Driving Us Apart : The Effect of Soliciting Consumer Input on Consumers’ Propensity to Transact with an Organization", Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), pp.242~259 (2011)
  30. McGraw, A. P., "From the Commercial to the Communal : Reframing Taboo Trade-Offs in Religious and Pharmaceutical Marketing", Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), pp.157~173 (2012)
  31. Morales, A. C., "Giving Firms an"E"for Effort : Consumer Responses to High-Effort Firms", Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), pp.806~812 (2005)
  32. Palmatier, R. W., "The Role of Customer Gratitude in Relationship Marketing", Journal of Marketing, 73(5), pp.1~18 (2009)
  33. Preacher, K. J., "SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models", Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), pp.717~731 (2004)
  34. Preacher, K. J., "Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing In-direct Effects in Multiple Mediator Models", Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), pp.879~891 (2008)
  35. Regan, D. T., "Effects of a Favor and Liking on Compliance", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(6), pp.627~639 (1971)
  36. Reingen, P. H., "Compliance with an Interview Request : A Foot-in-the-Door, Self-Perception Interpretation", Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), pp.365~369 (1977)
  37. Robert W. P, "Customer Loyalty to Whom? Managing the Benefits and Risks of Salesperson-Owned Loyalty", Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), pp.185~199 (2007)
  38. Ryu, G., "A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood", Journal of Marketing, 71(1), pp.84~94 (2007)
  39. Tesser, A., "Similarity of Objective Fate as a Determinant of the Reluctance to Transmit Unpleasant Information : The MUM Effect", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(1), pp.46~53 (1972)
  40. Uehara, E. S., "Reciprocity Reconsidered : Gouldner's Moral Norm of Reciprocity' and Social Support", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(4), pp.483~502 (1995)
  41. Wan, L. C., "The Role of Relationship Norms in Responses to Service Failures", Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), pp.260~277 (2011)
  42. Zhao, X., "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny : Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis", Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), pp.197~206 (2010)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)