高句麗와 百濟의 出系 認識 檢討

Abstract

Koguryo and Paekche had recognition that they were from same bloodlineage, Buyeo. This is supported by many historical evidences, now we usually thinks that they migrated from there. In connection with this, there is an opinion that regard 'Domodaewang' From japanese history books as King chumong, but in『Shinchansungssirok(which means new published namebook)』Domodaewang and Chumong were different person. First king of Buyeo, Dongmyong and Chumong are not the same. However, Late Koguryo period when Yeungaesomon grasped political power, Donmyong was raised than Chumong as he established the country. For these reasons after collapse of Koguryo, Dongmyong and Chumong was regarded as same person. Therefore, Koryo's History book 『Kusamguksa』didn't separate them. Among Storys of Pirue and Onzo from『Samkuksagi』Paekchebongi, Onzo's story was wrote down later. the background of this had a relation with the early Koryo's compile of historical document. And the reason of competition through war between Paekche and Koguryo was related to their intention of succession to Buyeo. The royal god of Paekche and Koguryo was same as Dongmyong. However, In 475 After reduction of Hansung, Paekche lost there temple of Dongmyong. Koguryo and Paekche's recognition that they were from same bloodlineage had a great meaning even we could find it at Palhae.