have to의 발달에 대한 화용론적 연구
A Pragmatic Study on the Development of have to.
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
This paper is to analyse the development of the English have to from the pragmatic point of view. Synchronically, have to shares both the deontic and the epistemic meaning with must. However, the meaning of have to is associated with objectivity in minimizing the speaker's role or focusing on external determining factors. Historically, the development of have to as a modal auxiliary is concerned with the context of utterance which gives rise to conversational implicatures that later become conventionalized and part of the meaning of old form. This study shows that have to constructions have been developed from the Old English [have + NP + to-infinitive ] into [have + to-infinitive + NP] forms by conventionalization of implicatures in which a context plays a significant role.
참고문헌 (31)
- Baugh, "A History of the English Language" (1993), Pretince Hall
- Brinton,Laurel J.1991, "Paper presented at the 10th ICHL", University of British Columbia
- Bybee, "The Evolution of Grammar and Modality in the Languages of the World University of Chicago Press" (1994)
- _, "Modality in Grammar and Discourse" (1995), John Benjamins Publishing Co
- Coates, "The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries" (1983)
- Denison,David, "English Historical Syntax" (1993), Longman
- Fennell, Barbara A., "A History of English: A Sociolinguistic Approach" (2001), Oxford, Blackwell
- Fischer,Olga, "The Development of Quasi-auxiliaries in English and Changes in Word Order", 78, pp.137~164 (1994)
- Ans van Kemenade, "The Syntax of Early English" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Gaff,W.van der, "？Beon？ and ？Habban？ Connected with an Inflected Infinitive", 13, pp.176~188 (1931)
- Grundy, Peter, "Doing Pragmatics" (2000), London: Oxford University Press
- Heine, "Studies in Language 16", pp.235~68 (1992)
- Joos, "University of Wisconsin" (1964)
- Krug, Manfred G, "Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Leech,Geoffrey N, "Meaning and the English Verb" (1987), Longman
- London, "Principles of Pragmatics" (1991)
- Lightfoot,David W, "Principles of Diachronic Syntax" (1979), Cambridge University Press
- "The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution" (1999), Cambridge: Blackwell
- Lyons,John, "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Mey Jacob L, "Pragmatics" (1993), Blackwell
- Myhill, John., "The Development of the Strong Obligation System in American English.", 71(4), pp.339~388 (1996)
- Newmeyer,Frederic, "Language Form and Language Function" (1994), MIT Press
- Palmer,Frank R, "The English Verb" (1974), Longman
- Perkins, "Modal Expressions in English" (1983)
- Quirk et, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985)
- Smith, Jeremy, "An Historical Study of English: Function, Form and Change" (1996), London and New York: Routledge
- Stein D., "Subjectivity and Subjectivization: Linguistic perspectives." (1995), Cambridge University Press
- Sweetser,E, "From Etymology to Pragmatics" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Traugott, "Approaches to Grammaticalization", 2 s (1991)
- Visser,Frederikus Th, "An Historical Syntax of the English Language" (1969), Brill
- Westney,Paul, "Modals and Periphrastic in English" (1995), Niemeyer