본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Dynamics of a Peer Response Group in a Mixed-Level Korean EFL Writing Class

1

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to investigate the dynamics of a peer response group in a mixed-level Korean EFL writing class. Although some reservations in peer feedback (e.g. relation between peer feedback and revision, cultural aspects, detailed descriptions of the peer feedback process, etc.) have been addressed, peer feedback has been considered as a productive option in evaluating student writing, especially with adequately trained students. On the foundation of the so-far-conducted studies, what needs to be done to expand our perspective on peer feedback is to look into varying writing contexts since the insight into peer feedback mostly results from the research outcomes from the North-American ESL context. This study is conducted in the academic context in Korea. Four students are served as participants whose majors are English education. The data for this study include students’ first drafts, transcripts of group peer feedback workshop, students’ subsequent drafts, and interview transcripts. The focus of this inquiry will be on the roles and interactions of each student in a mixed-group feedback, feedback types, revision after the group peer feedback, and the students’ perception on the mixed-group feedback. The results of this study will shed light on the pedagogical approach in a large and mixed-level writing classroom in relation to group configuration, peers’ reaction in groups, and effects of such peer feedback workshop.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the dynamics of a peer response group in a mixed-level Korean EFL writing class. Although some reservations in peer feedback (e.g. relation between peer feedback and revision, cultural aspects, detailed descriptions of the peer feedback process, etc.) have been addressed, peer feedback has been considered as a productive option in evaluating student writing, especially with adequately trained students. On the foundation of the so-far-conducted studies, what needs to be done to expand our perspective on peer feedback is to look into varying writing contexts since the insight into peer feedback mostly results from the research outcomes from the North-American ESL context. This study is conducted in the academic context in Korea. Four students are served as participants whose majors are English education. The data for this study include students’ first drafts, transcripts of group peer feedback workshop, students’ subsequent drafts, and interview transcripts. The focus of this inquiry will be on the roles and interactions of each student in a mixed-group feedback, feedback types, revision after the group peer feedback, and the students’ perception on the mixed-group feedback. The results of this study will shed light on the pedagogical approach in a large and mixed-level writing classroom in relation to group configuration, peers’ reaction in groups, and effects of such peer feedback workshop.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Allison, D., "Developing Text Revision Abilities, in Developing Writing: Purposes and Practice", pp.106~130 (1992), Institute of Language in Education
  2. Berg, E. C., "The Effects of Trained Peer Response on ESL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.215~241 (1999)
  3. Chaudron, C, "The Effects of Feedback on Students’ Composition Revisions", RELC Journal, 15(2), pp.1~14 (1984)
  4. Connor, U., "Peer Response Groups in ESL Writing Classes: How Much Impact on Revision", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), pp.257~276 (1994)
  5. Ferris, D. R., "Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students" (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  6. Ferris, D., "Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice" (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  7. George, D, "Working with Peer Groups in the Composition Classroom", College Composition and Communication, 35, pp.320~326 (1984)
  8. Hedgcock, J., "Collaborative Oral", Aural Revision in Foreign Language Writing Instruction, 1992, pp.1(3), 255~276
  9. Keh, C. L., "Feedback in the Writing Process: A Model and Methods for Implementation", ELT Journal, 44, pp.294~304 (1990)
  10. Leki, I, "Coaching from the Margins: Issues in Written Response, in Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom", pp.57~68 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  11. Liang, M-Y, "Using Synchronous Online Peer Response Groups in EFL Writing: Revision-Related Discourse", Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), pp.45~64 (2010)
  12. Liu, J., "Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms" (2002), University of Michigan Press
  13. Lockhart, C., "Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances, Functions, and Content", Language Learning, 45(4), pp.1~51 (1995)
  14. Mangelsdorf, K, "Peer Reviews in the ESL Composition Classroom: What Do the Students Think", ELT Journal, 46, pp.274~284 (1992)
  15. Mangelsdorf, K., "ESL Student Response Stances in a Peer-Review Task", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.235~254 (1992)
  16. Mendonça, C. O., "Peer Review Negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), pp.745~769 (1994)
  17. Min, H-T, "The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), pp.118~141 (2006)
  18. Mittan, R., "The Peer Review Process: Harnessing Students’ Communicative Power, in Richness in Writing: Empowering ESL Students", pp.207~219 (1989), Longman
  19. Nelson, G. L., "ESL Students Perceptions of Effectiveness in Peer Response Groups", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), pp.113~131 (1998)
  20. Nelson, G. L., "An L2 Writing Group: Task and Social Dimensions", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.171~193 (1992)
  21. Paulus, T. M., "The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.265~289 (1999)
  22. Tsui, A. B. M., "Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
  23. Wells, G, "Dialogic Inquiry Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  24. 유호정, "The Effects of Online Peer Feedback with TrackChanges and Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication", 영어영문학21, 23(2), pp.197~214 (2010), 21세기영어영문학회
  25. Zhang, S, "Reexamining the Affective Advantage of Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), pp.209~222 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)