본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Role of Head Nouns in Real-time Semantic Integration of Second Language Noun-noun Compounds

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study aims to investigate the role of head nouns during real-time interpretations of noun-noun compounds in English. A major debate in the first language (L1) psycholinguistics is which constituent (i.e., either a modifier or a head) plays more significant role in the online interpretation of noun-noun compounds. In the second language (L2) literature, this debate has been understudied. Implementing a priming method and focusing on a case where primes and targets share the second constituent, namely, the head noun, this study examines the facilitations of reaction times of the first and the second language speakers; an exposure to a noun-noun compound (e.g., orange tree) speeds up the interpretation of a subsequent compound (e.g., peach tree) when the two noun-noun compounds have the same thematic relation in comparison to a pair that have different thematic relation. On a computerized lexical sense decision task, L1 and L2 participants judged whether a series of compounds is sensible as quickly and accurately possible. Linear mixed-effect models revealed that the response patterns of the L1 and the L2 group did not differ significantly and both groups responded faster to the targets of the same relation than to those of the different relation. The findings were discussed with respect to the L1 debate on the real-time semantic integration and in terms of L2 compound processing.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the role of head nouns during real-time interpretations of noun-noun compounds in English. A major debate in the first language (L1) psycholinguistics is which constituent (i.e., either a modifier or a head) plays more significant role in the online interpretation of noun-noun compounds. In the second language (L2) literature, this debate has been understudied. Implementing a priming method and focusing on a case where primes and targets share the second constituent, namely, the head noun, this study examines the facilitations of reaction times of the first and the second language speakers; an exposure to a noun-noun compound (e.g., orange tree) speeds up the interpretation of a subsequent compound (e.g., peach tree) when the two noun-noun compounds have the same thematic relation in comparison to a pair that have different thematic relation. On a computerized lexical sense decision task, L1 and L2 participants judged whether a series of compounds is sensible as quickly and accurately possible. Linear mixed-effect models revealed that the response patterns of the L1 and the L2 group did not differ significantly and both groups responded faster to the targets of the same relation than to those of the different relation. The findings were discussed with respect to the L1 debate on the real-time semantic integration and in terms of L2 compound processing.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Baayen, H, "Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  2. Baayen, H, "Mixed Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items", Journal of Memory and Language, 59, pp.390~412 (2008)
  3. Downing, P, "On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns", Language, 53, pp.810~842 (1977)
  4. Estes, Z, "nteractive Property Activation in Conceptual Combination", Memory and Cognition, 28, pp.28~34 (2000)
  5. Gagné, C, "Lexical and Relational Influences on the Processing of Novel Compounds", Brain and Language, 81, pp.723~735 (2002)
  6. Gagné, C, "The Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier-noun Combinations", Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, pp.71~87 (1997)
  7. Gagné, C, "Priming Relation in Ambiguous Noun-noun Combinations", Memory and Cognition, 30, pp.637~643 (2002)
  8. Gagné, C, "Relation Availability was not Confounded with Familiarity or Plausibility in Gagné and Shoben (1997): Comment on Wisniewski and Murphy (2005)", Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, pp.1431~1437 (2005)
  9. Gagné, C, "Re-examining Evidence for the Use of Independent Relational Representations during Conceptual Combination", Journal of Memory and Language, 53, pp.445~455 (2005)
  10. 김지현, "Frequency Effects on Formulaic Sequences: Do Corpus Frequencies Apply to EFL Learners?", 영어학연구, 18(1), pp.17~34 (2012), 한국영어학학회
  11. 이준규, "RELATION PRIMING AND COMPOUND PROCESSING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE", 언어학, 57(57), pp.65~81 (2010), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  12. 이준규, "Ambiguity Advantage or Disadvantage? Lexical Access to Second Language Homonymy", 영어학연구, 16(2), pp.163~179 (2010), 한국영어학학회
  13. 이준규, "The Activations of Relational Structures in Processing Second Language Noun-noun Compound", 언어연구, 28(1), pp.143~157 (2011), 언어정보연구소
  14. 이준규, "제2 언어 어휘의 형태와 의미의 연결: 동일번역효과의 재검증을 중심으로", 영어학연구, 17(3), pp.303~317 (2011), 한국영어학학회
  15. 이준규, "반응시간을 이용한 제2 언어 어휘의 연결강도 추정", 언어학, 61(61), pp.243~261 (2011), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  16. Levi, J, "The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals" (1978), Academic Press
  17. Libben, G, "Why Study Compounds: An Overview of the Issues, In The representation and processing of compound words", pp.1~21 (2006), Oxford University Press
  18. Murphy, G, "Comprehending Complex Concepts", Cognitive Science, 12, pp.529~562 (1988)
  19. Murphy, G, "Noun Phrase Interpretation and Conceptual Combination", Journal of Memory and Language, 29, pp.259~288 (1990)
  20. 신정아, "Phonological Short-term Memory and Second Language Proficiency", 영어학연구, 18(2), pp.127~145 (2012), 한국영어학학회
  21. Shoben, E, "Predicting and Nonpredicting Combinations, In The Psychology of Word Meanings", pp.117~135 (1991), Erlbaum
  22. Wisniewski, E, "Construal and Similarity in Conceptual Combination", Journal of Memory and Language, 35, pp.434~453 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)