원어민 및 한국인 교수자에 따른 영어쓰기 과정의 만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인 비교
Comparison of Variables Influencing on Students’ Satisfaction about the Process of English Writing Conducted by English Native and Korean Instructors
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purposes of this study are to identify what variables were involved, and to compare if there are differences between these variables influencing on students’ satisfaction about the process of English writing conducted by native and Korean instructors. For this purposes, 98 Korean university students were participated for a survey and interview. For data analysis, factor analysis, one-way ANOVA, and t-test were used. According to the results of this study, variables related to writing procedure, characteristics of students and instructors, types of feedback that instructors provided, and ways of providing feedback by instructors were found to be influencing on the students’ satisfaction about the English writing process. And significant differences on the degrees of satisfaction that students rated on these variables were found between native and Korean instructors. These findings will be useful for instructors in planning the instructional design of English writing. by considering these variables carefully to increase the satisfaction that students feel about the English writing process
Abstract
The purposes of this study are to identify what variables were involved, and to compare if there are differences between these variables influencing on students’ satisfaction about the process of English writing conducted by native and Korean instructors. For this purposes, 98 Korean university students were participated for a survey and interview. For data analysis, factor analysis, one-way ANOVA, and t-test were used. According to the results of this study, variables related to writing procedure, characteristics of students and instructors, types of feedback that instructors provided, and ways of providing feedback by instructors were found to be influencing on the students’ satisfaction about the English writing process. And significant differences on the degrees of satisfaction that students rated on these variables were found between native and Korean instructors. These findings will be useful for instructors in planning the instructional design of English writing. by considering these variables carefully to increase the satisfaction that students feel about the English writing process
참고문헌 (41)
- 강남욱, "한국어 교사의 학습자 오류 평가에 대한 연구 - 원어민(NS) 교사와 비원어민(NNS) 교사의 오류 판정 양상을 중심으로", 국어교육연구, (22), pp.185~227 (2008), 국어교육연구소[DOI]
- 김양희, "The effectiveness of diverse types of written feedback: Comparative study of teacher and student feedback.", 영어어문교육, 16(4), pp.133~152 (2010), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 김혜련, "초등학교의 원어민 영어보조교사 활용 실태: 경기도를 중심으로", 초등영어교육, 14(2), pp.23~43 (2008), 한국초등영어교육학회
- 김충일, "컴퓨터 기반 및 과정중심의 작문교육에 있어서 상호작용에 대한 연구", 영어교육연구, 17(4), pp.203~227 (2005), 팬코리아영어교육학회
- 김효순, "상호작용적 피드백 유형이 영어쓰기능력과 정의적 영역에 미치는 효과", 석사, 초등영어교육, pp.2007
- 방영주, "효율적인 원어민 영어교사 자질에 대한 인식", 현대영어교육, 8(3), pp.341~365 (2007), 현대영어교육학회
- 변지현, "영작문 수업에서 교사 피드백에 대한 학습자 인식 및 반응 조사", 언어학연구, 19(3), pp.27~51 (2014), 한국언어연구학회
- 여경희, "대학 교양영어 수업에서의 원어민교수와 비원어민 교수에 대한 학생들의 인식 및 태도 연구", 영미어문학, (105), pp.275~301 (2012), 한국영미어문학회
- 이완기, "대학생의 영어 말하기 능력 평가 모형", 영어교육, 50(1), pp.37~63 (1995)
- 이향, "말하기 평가에서 비원어민 예비 교사의 채점 경향 연구", 언어학 연구, (48), pp.321~340 (2018), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- 전혜원, "학습자 참여에 의한 영어 쓰기 평가 척도 개발 및 자기평가 연구: 고등학생을 중심으로", 현대영미어문학, 33(3), pp.285~309 (2015), 현대영미어문학회
- 정양수, "CMC기반의 언어학습 환경에서 행해진 영어 쓰기활동이 영어 말하기 능력에 미치는 효과", 언어연구, 21(2), pp.113~132 (2005), 한국현대언어학회
- 정양수, "영어쓰기 과정에서 제공되는 피드백의 유형과 제공방법에 대한 학습자의 요구분석 연구", 현대영미어문학, 30(1), pp.31~56 (2012), 현대영미어문학회
- 정양수, "교수자에 따른 영어쓰기 피드백의 유형과 효과에 관한 학습자들의 인식 연구", 현대영미어문학, 35(1), pp.245~270 (2017), 현대영미어문학회[DOI]
- Barmwell, D, "Native’ Native Speakers and Judgements of Oral Proficiency in Spanish", Language Testing, 6(2), pp.152~163 (1989)
- Brown, A, "The Effect of Rater Variables in the Development of an Occupation-Specific Language Performance Test", Language Testing, 12(1), pp.1~15 (1995)
- Chandler, J, "The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency in L2Student Writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, pp.267~296 (2003)
- Cole, P. G., "Teaching Principles and Practice" (1987), Prentice-Hall
- Paul Dobranic, "A Study on Korean University Students' Perception of Native and Non-native English Speaking Instructors’ English Courses", 언어학연구, 21(3), pp.35~60 (2016), 한국언어연구학회[DOI]
- Douglas, D, "Quantity and Quality in Speaking Test Performance", Language Testing, 11, pp.125~144 (1994)
- Ferris, D. R, "Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multi-Draft Composition Classroom", TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), pp.33~53 (1995)
- Ferris, D. R., "Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes: How Explicit Does it Need to be?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), pp.161~184 (2001)
- Greller, M. M., "Sources of feedback: A preliminary investigation", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(2), pp.244~256 (1975)
- Hedgcook, J., "Collaborative Oral", Aural Revision in Foreign Language Writing Instruction, 1992, pp.4, 51~70
- Hirvela, A, "Collaborative Writing Instruction and Communities of Readers and Writers", TESOL Journal, 8(2), pp.7~12 (1999)
- Kim, Y. H, "An Investigation into Native and Non-native Teachers’ Judgements of Oral English Performance: A Mixed Methods Approach", Language Testing, 26(2), pp.187~217 (2009)
- Hill, K, "Who should be the Judge?: The Use of Non-native Speakers as Raters on a Test of English as an International Language", Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 5(2), pp.29~49 (1996)
- Leki, I, "The Preference of ESL Students for Error Correction in College-Level Writing Classes", Foreign Language Annals, 24, pp.203~218 (1991)
- Liu, J., "Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms" (2002), University of Michigan Press
- Mangelsdorf, K., "ESL Student Response Stances in a Peer Review Task", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, pp.235~254 (1992)
- Medgyes, P, "Native or Non-native: Who’s Worth More?", ELT Journal, 46(4), pp.340~349 (1992)
- NcNamara, T., "Measuring Second Language Performance" (1996), Longman
- Nelson, G. L., "Peer Response Groups : Task and Social Dimensions", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, pp.172~193 (1993)
- Saito, H, "Teachers ‘Practices and Students’ Preferences for Feedback on Second Language Writing: A Case Study of Adult ESL Learners", TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), pp.46~70 (1994)
- Sherry, L, "Nature and Purpose of Online Discourse: A Brief Synthesis of Current Research as Related to the WEB Project", International Journal of Telecommunications, 7, pp.19~51 (2000)
- Shi, L, "Native and Non-native Speaking EFL Teachers’s Evaluation of Chinese Students’ English Writing", Language Testing, 18(3), pp.303~325 (2001)
- Straub, R, "Student’s Reactions to Teacher Comments: An Exploratory Study", Research in the Teaching of English, 31, pp.91~119 (1997)
- Truscott, J, "The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes", Language Learning, 46(2), pp.327~369 (1996)
- Tsui, A. B. M., "Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
- Young, R., "Discourse Variation in Oral Proficiency Interviews", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, pp.403~424 (1992)
- Zhang, S, "Thoughts on Some Recent Evidence Concerning the Affective Advantage of Peer Feedback", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.321~326 (1999)
