본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Comparative Study of Hedges between ES and KS in Two Fields of Study: English Education vs. Biology

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The appropriate use of hedges in scientific fields indicates that the writer/speaker is aware of the conventions of academic writing. Korean EFL learners have been known to experience difficulties in correctly using hedging devices due to the L1 conventions of writing. Studies on their use of hedges, however, have relied mostly on a single genre or discipline. This study compared uses of hedges between Korean EFL learners (KS) and English speakers (ES) in two academic fields, English Education and Biology, to reveal how the KS group employs English hedges differently from the ES in dissertation writing. Adopting Salager-Meyer’s (1994) taxonomy, we analyzed the discussion sections of 80 doctoral dissertations, 40 by KS and 40 by ES, in two fields, showing that the KS group used hedges noticeably less than the ES, especially, in Biology. These findings imply that Korean EFL learners should fully understand the positive functions of hedges in academic writing as well as the importance of distinctive writing conventions in different disciplines. No over-generalization of conservative perception of hedging devices to the fields of science should be encouraged.

Abstract

The appropriate use of hedges in scientific fields indicates that the writer/speaker is aware of the conventions of academic writing. Korean EFL learners have been known to experience difficulties in correctly using hedging devices due to the L1 conventions of writing. Studies on their use of hedges, however, have relied mostly on a single genre or discipline. This study compared uses of hedges between Korean EFL learners (KS) and English speakers (ES) in two academic fields, English Education and Biology, to reveal how the KS group employs English hedges differently from the ES in dissertation writing. Adopting Salager-Meyer’s (1994) taxonomy, we analyzed the discussion sections of 80 doctoral dissertations, 40 by KS and 40 by ES, in two fields, showing that the KS group used hedges noticeably less than the ES, especially, in Biology. These findings imply that Korean EFL learners should fully understand the positive functions of hedges in academic writing as well as the importance of distinctive writing conventions in different disciplines. No over-generalization of conservative perception of hedging devices to the fields of science should be encouraged.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Aaker, J., "Empathy versus Pride : The Influence of Emotional Appeals across Cultures", Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), pp.241~261 (1998)
  2. 백주현, "A corpus-based study of hedging in Korean EFL students' academic essays", 현대문법연구, (65), pp.279~307 (2011), 현대문법학회
  3. Butler, C., "The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse", pp.145~147 (1990), Sage
  4. 최연희, "Hedging in EFL Academic Writing of Korean Postgraduates", 영어교육, 60(1), pp.3~27 (2005), 한국영어교육학회
  5. Cortazzi, M., "Overseas Students in Higher Education: Issues in Teaching and Learning", pp.76~90 (1997), Routledge
  6. Cutting, J., "Vague Language in Conference Abstracts", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, pp.283~293 (2012)
  7. Dudley-Evans, T, "Sociocultural Issues in English for Academic Purpose", pp.41~51 (1992), Phoenix ELT.
  8. Ekoç, A., "Analyzing Turkish MA Students’ Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts", Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, pp.49~62 (2010)
  9. Getkham, K., "Hedging Devices in Applied Linguistics Research Articles", Paper presented at The 3rd International Conference on Language and Communication (ICLC). (2011)
  10. Hinkel, E., "Indirectness in L1 and L2 Academic Writing", Journal of Pragmatics, 27(3), pp.360~386 (1997)
  11. Hinkel, E., "Second Language Writers’ Text : Linguistic and Rhetorical Features" (2002), Routledge
  12. Hinkel, E., "Hedging, Inflating, and Persuading in L2 Academic Writing", Applied Language Learning, 15(1), pp.29~53 (2005)
  13. Holmes, J., "Expressing Doubt and Certainty in English", RELC Journal, 13(2), pp.9~28 (1982)
  14. Holmes, J., "Doubt and Certainty in ESL textbooks", Applied Linguistics, 9(1), pp.21~44 (1988)
  15. Hyland, K., "Hedging in Academic Writing and EAP Textbooks", English for Specific Purposes, 13, pp.239~256 (1994)
  16. Hyland, K., "Nurturing Hedges in the ESP Curriculum", System, 24(4), pp.477~490 (1996)
  17. Hyland, K., "Talking to the Academy : Forms of Hedging in Science Research Articles", Written Communication, 13(25), pp.1~28 (1996)
  18. Hyland, K., "Hedging in Scientific Research Articles" (1998), John Benjamins Publishing
  19. Hyland, K., "Disciplinary Discourses : Writer Stance in Research Articles" (1999), Routhledge
  20. Hyland, K., "Directives : Argument and Engagement in Academic Writing", Applied Linguistics, 23, pp.215~239 (2002)
  21. Hyland, K., "Qualification and Certainty in L1 and L2 Students’Writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, pp.183~205 (1997)
  22. Hyland, K., "Metadiscourse in Academic Writing", Applied Linguistics, 24, pp.156~177 (2004)
  23. 장은영, "Pedagogical potentials of cohesive devices for EFL writing", 영어교육연구, 28(2), pp.29~45 (2016), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  24. Kawase, T., "Metadiscourse in the Introductions of PhD Theses and Research Articles", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, pp.114~124 (2015)
  25. Kim, J-W., "Rhetorical Functions of Metadiscourse in EFL Writing", English Teaching, 54(4), pp.3~25 (1999)
  26. 김찬희, "Epistemic Rhetorical Stance: Hedges and Boosters in L1 and L2 Students’ English Writing", 언어학, 22(2), pp.61~93 (2014), 대한언어학회[DOI]
  27. Kim, L. C., "Hedging in Academic Writing-A Pedagogically-Motivated Qualitative Study", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, pp.600~607 (2015)
  28. Kubota, R., "An Investigation of L1-L2 Transfer in Writing among Japanese University Students : Implications for Contrastive Rhetoric", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, pp.69~100 (1998)
  29. Lakoff, G., "A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), pp.458~508 (1973)
  30. Lyon, J., "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
  31. Markkanen, R., "Hedging : A Challenge for Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis", Hedging and Discourse : Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, 24, pp.3~18 (1997)
  32. Myers, G., "Texts as Knowledge Claims : The Social Constructions of Two Biology Articles", Social Studies of Science, 15, pp.393~630 (1985)
  33. Myers, G., "The Pragmatics of Politeness in Scientific Articles", Applied Linguistics, 10, pp.1~35 (1989)
  34. Nasiri, S., "Hedging Devices by Native and Non-native Psychology Researchers", International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3(2), pp.151~154 (2012)
  35. 오선영, "A Corpus-based Study of Epistemic Modalityin Korean College Students’ Writings in English", 영어교육, 62(2), pp.147~175 (2007), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  36. Oliver, R. T., "Communication and Culture in Ancient India and China" (1972), Syracuse University Press
  37. Paré, A., "Re-writing the Doctorate : New Contexts, Identities, and Genres", Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, pp.80~84 (2019)
  38. Paré, A., "Genre in a Changing World", pp.179~193 (2009), Parlor Press.
  39. Prince, E., "Linguistics and the Professions", pp.83~97 (1982), Ablex Publishing Corporation
  40. Rowland, T., "Hedges in Mathematics Talk : Linguistic Pointers to Uncertainty", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(4), pp.327~353 (1995)
  41. Salager-Meyer, F., "Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical English Written Discourse", English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), pp.149~170 (1994)
  42. Salager-Meyer, F., "Scientific Discourse and Contrastive Linguistics : Hedging", European Sicence Editing, 37(2), pp.35~37 (2011)
  43. Šeškauskien, I, "Hedging in ESL : A Case Study of Lithuanian Learners", Studies about Languages, 13, pp.71~76 (2008)
  44. 심은숙, "Teaching and Learning Hedging in Academic Writing", 영어영문학연구, 47(4), pp.197~220 (2005), 한국중앙영어영문학회
  45. Swales, J., "Genre Analysis : English in Academic and Research Settings" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  46. Tayler, G., "Linguistic, Cultural, and Subcultural Issues in Contrastive Discourse Analysis : Anglo-American and Chinese Scientific Tests", Applied Linguistics, 12(2), pp.319~336 (1991)
  47. Thomas, J., "Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure", Applied Linguistics, 7(2), pp.91~112 (1983)
  48. Uysal, H., "Occupying Niches: Interculturality, Cross-culturality and Aculturality in Academic Research", pp.179~195 (2014), Springer International Publishing.
  49. Vande Kopple, W., "Discourse Studies in Composition", pp.91~113 (2002), Hampton Press
  50. Wahyuningsih, S., "Hedges in Thesis Abstracts of Graduate Students of Semerang State University", English Education Journal, 42, pp.75~81 (2014)
  51. Raksangob Wijitsopon, "Collocations and local textual functions of quantifiers in learner English essays", 언어연구, 34(1), pp.1~49 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)