Kentish Vowel Mergers in Old English: An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Kentish, one of the Old English (OE) dialects, by the 10th century front vowels /y(:)/, /ø(:)/, /æ(:)/ were merged with /e(:)/ and disappeared from the vowel inventory. The goals of this study is to explore the Kentish front vowel mergers in OE and to show how they can be explained within the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004, McCarthy & Prince 1993, 1995). In this study, I propose two analyses of the same data and compare them. One of them is based on dispersion theory (Flemming 2002, 2004, 2006). The proposed dispersion-theoretic analysis predicts that Kentish front vowel mergers would occur to increase the distinctiveness of the front vowel contrasts. This is correctly captured by the interaction of MAXIMIZE CONTRASTS and sets of MINDIST constraints. The analysis, however, fails to explain how /y(:)/ became /e(:)/ but not more faithful /i(:)/. By contrast, the other analysis treats the individual vowel mergers in terms of markedness and faithfulness constraints. It predicts the Kentish front vowel mergers would occur to eliminate the marked front vowels in the inventory. In addition, it is shown that the proposed analysis can explain how /y(:)/ became /e(:)/ by utilizing constraint conjunction. A comparison of the two analyses leads us to the conclusion that the Kentish front vowel mergers can be better explained by the interaction of the markedness and faithfulness constraints rather than by that of the constraints on contrasts.
Abstract
In Kentish, one of the Old English (OE) dialects, by the 10th century front vowels /y(:)/, /ø(:)/, /æ(:)/ were merged with /e(:)/ and disappeared from the vowel inventory. The goals of this study is to explore the Kentish front vowel mergers in OE and to show how they can be explained within the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004, McCarthy & Prince 1993, 1995). In this study, I propose two analyses of the same data and compare them. One of them is based on dispersion theory (Flemming 2002, 2004, 2006). The proposed dispersion-theoretic analysis predicts that Kentish front vowel mergers would occur to increase the distinctiveness of the front vowel contrasts. This is correctly captured by the interaction of MAXIMIZE CONTRASTS and sets of MINDIST constraints. The analysis, however, fails to explain how /y(:)/ became /e(:)/ but not more faithful /i(:)/. By contrast, the other analysis treats the individual vowel mergers in terms of markedness and faithfulness constraints. It predicts the Kentish front vowel mergers would occur to eliminate the marked front vowels in the inventory. In addition, it is shown that the proposed analysis can explain how /y(:)/ became /e(:)/ by utilizing constraint conjunction. A comparison of the two analyses leads us to the conclusion that the Kentish front vowel mergers can be better explained by the interaction of the markedness and faithfulness constraints rather than by that of the constraints on contrasts.
참고문헌 (26)
- Algeo, J., "The Origins and Development of the English Language" (2014), Cengage Learning
- Anderson, J. M, "Luick Revisited", pp.97~107 (1988), Narr
- Boersma, P., "Inventories in Functional Phonology", ms, pp.1997
- Campbell, A., "Old English Grammar" (1959), Oxford University Press
- Crowly, J. P, "The Study of Old English Dialects", English Studies, 67, pp.97~112 (1986)
- DeCamp, D, "The Genesis of Old English Dialects : A New Hypothesis", Language, 34, pp.232~244 (1958)
- Flemming, E., "Auditory Representations in Phonology" (2002), Garland Press
- Flemming, E, "Phonetically Based Phonology", pp.232~276 (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Flemming, E., "The Role of Distinctiveness Constraints in Phonology", ms, pp.2006
- Hogg, R, "Luick Revisited", pp.183~203 (1988), Narr
- Hogg, R., "A Grammar of Old English, Vol I: Phonology" (1992), Oxford University Press
- Itô, J., "Handout of talk at the Kobe Phonology Forum" (1996)
- Itô, J., "Japanese Morphophonemics: Markedness and Word Structure" (2003), MIT Press
- Łubowicz, A, "Derived Environment Effects in Optimality Theory", Lingua, 112, pp.243~280 (2002)
- Łubowicz, A, "Local Conjunction and Comparative Markedness", Theoretical Linguistics, 29, pp.101~112 (2003)
- Łubowicz, A, "Locality of Conjunction", Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.254~262 (2005), Cascadilla Proceeding Project
- Maddieson, I., "Patterns of Sounds" (1984), Cambridge University Press
- McCarthy, J., "Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction", ms, pp.1993
- McCarthy, J, "University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18", pp.249~384 (1995), GLSA
- Millward, C., "A Biography of the English Language" (2012), Cengage Learning
- Prince, A., "Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar" (2004), Blackwell
- Samuels, M. L, "Edinburgh Studies in English and Scots", pp.1~19 (1971), Longman
- Smolensky, P., "Handout from Rutgers Optimality Workshop I" (1993)
- Smolensky, P., "Handout from talk at University California" (1995)
- Smolensky, P., "Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar II: Local Conjunction, or Random Rules in Universal Grammar. Handout from Hopkins Optimality Theory Workshop", Maryland Mayfest ’97, Baltimore. Steponavičius, A. The English Vowel System in the Period of the Oldest Written Records (VII-X cc.), 1997, pp.22(3), 19~30
- Sweet, H., "The Oldest English Texts" (1885), Oxford University Press