Popular Movements and Violence in East Asia in the Nineteenth Century: Comparing the Ideological Foundations of their Legitimation
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the nineteenth century, people in China, Korea, and Japan actively participated in popular protests. The rebellions in those countries had much in common, but one of the most striking differences is the degree of violence inflicted by these popular movements on their opponents. Chinese popular rebels were much more likely to kill or injure others than their counterparts in Korea and Japan. Such differences seem to be closely associated with the question of whether the rebel forces fought due to conflicting interests within the polity, or were seeking to build a new kingdom by pursuing a newly-risen religion while rejecting the existing ruling system and ideology that legitimized it. This paper will examine how the rebel forces based the legitimacy of their actions in relation to each country’s “political culture.” While popular movements in the West or the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom were based on the idea that God was more powerful than the secular ruler, popular movements in Korea or Japan did not have a transcendent source of authority that was superior to the monarch. This paper argues that this made a crucial difference to how people thought and behaved, influencing the degree of violence they employed.
Abstract
In the nineteenth century, people in China, Korea, and Japan actively participated in popular protests. The rebellions in those countries had much in common, but one of the most striking differences is the degree of violence inflicted by these popular movements on their opponents. Chinese popular rebels were much more likely to kill or injure others than their counterparts in Korea and Japan. Such differences seem to be closely associated with the question of whether the rebel forces fought due to conflicting interests within the polity, or were seeking to build a new kingdom by pursuing a newly-risen religion while rejecting the existing ruling system and ideology that legitimized it. This paper will examine how the rebel forces based the legitimacy of their actions in relation to each country’s “political culture.” While popular movements in the West or the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom were based on the idea that God was more powerful than the secular ruler, popular movements in Korea or Japan did not have a transcendent source of authority that was superior to the monarch. This paper argues that this made a crucial difference to how people thought and behaved, influencing the degree of violence they employed.
참고문헌 (90)
- Asao Naohiro, ". Vol. 1" (1994), Iwanami Shoten
- 배항섭, "Foundations for the Legitimation of the Tonghak Peasant Army and Awareness of a New Political Order", Acta Koreana, 16(2), pp.399~430 (2013), 한국학연구원
- Baker, Keith Michael, "The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture: The Political Culture of the Old Regime. Vol. 1" (1987), Pergamon Press
- Buraku kaihō kenkyūjo, (1995), Kaihō Shuppansha
- 장영민, "1871년 영해 동학란", Han’guk hakpo, 47, pp.98~135 (1987)
- 조병한, "태평천국과 중국의 농민운동" (1981), In’gan
- 趙景達, (1998), Iwanami Shoten
- 趙景達, (2011), Tokyodo Shuppan
- 조승래, "18세기말 영국의 토지개혁론", Sŏyangsaron, 55, pp.33~59 (1997)
- 정진각, "1901년 제주민란에 관한 일고-소위 신축교난의 발생 원인을 중심으로", Han’gukhak nonjip, 3, pp.77~93 (1983)
- "Han’guksa yŏn’gu", 1972, 519~576
- Cohn, Norman, "Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Ages" (2004), Pimlico
- Eisenstadt, S. N., "Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities: A Collection of Essays" (2003), Brill Academic Publishers
- Elliott, Mark C., "Emperor Qianlong: Son of Heaven, Man of the World" (2009), Pearson Longman
- Freedman, Maurice, "Lineage Organization in Southeastern China" (1965), University of London Athlone Press
- Freedman, Paul H., "Images of the Medieval Peasant" (1999), Stanford University Press
- 五野井隆史, (2014), Yoshikawa Kōbunkan
- Harrison, J. F. C., "The Common People: A History from the Norman Conquest to the Present" (1984), Collins
- Hung, Ho-fung, "Protest with Chinese Characteristics: Demonstrations, Riots, and Petitions in the Mid-Qing Dynasty" (2011), Columbia University Press
- 현광호, "프랑스의 시각에서 본 1901년 제주민란", 한국민족운동사연구, (83), pp.5~44 (2015), 한국민족운동사학회
- 井上勝生, (2002), Kodansha
- . Vol. 1, "Housed in the National Palace Museum of Korea", 1894
- Kallander, G., "Eastern Bandits or Revolutionary Soldiers? The 1894 Tonghak Uprising in Korean History and Memory", History Compass, 8, pp.1126~1141 (2010)
- Anders Karlsson, "Challenging the Dynasty: Popular Protest, Chonggamnok and the Ideology of the Hong Kyongnae Rebellion", International Journal of Korean History, 2, pp.253~277 (2001), 민족문화연구원
- 김준형, (2001), Chisik Sanŏpsa
- 김옥희, (1980), Ch’ŏnjugyo Cheju Kyogu
- Kim, Sun Joo, "Marginality and Subversion in Korea: The Hong Kyŏngnae Rebellion of 1812" (2007), University of Washington Press
- 김성찬, "태평천국 평균이념의 전개와 그 근대적 변모—<천조전무제도> 평균론의 <자정신편>에 대한 영향", Tongyangsa yŏn’gu, 76, pp.201~225 (2001)
- 김성찬, "宗族共同體의 遺産과 太平天國의 平均理念", 명청사연구, (37), pp.147~195 (2012), 명청사학회
- 김윤식, (1960), Kuksa P’yŏnch’an Wiwŏnhoe
- Kuksa P’yŏnch’an Wiwŏnhoe, (1959), T’amgudang
- Kuksa P’yŏnch’an Wiwŏnhoe, (1972), T’amgudang
- Kuksa P’yŏnch’an Wiwŏnhoe, ". Vol. 1" (1986), Kuksa P’yŏnch’an Wiwŏnhoe
- Kuksa P’yŏnch’an Wiwŏnhoe, ". Vol.3" (1979), Kuksa P’yŏnch’an Wiwŏnhoe
- Lew, Young Ick, "The Conservative Character of the Tonghak Peasant Uprising", The Journal of Korean Studies, 7, pp.149~180 (1990)
- Menzel, Wolfgang, "Germany: From the Earliest Period. Vol. 2" (1899), Co-operative Publication Society
- 中島樂章, (2002), Kyuko Shoin
- 오지영, (1940), Yŏngch’ang Sŏgwan
- 오횡묵, (2007), Kosŏng Munhwawŏn
- 배항섭, (2002), Kyŏngin Munhwasa
- 배항섭, "제1차 동학농민전쟁 시기 농민군의 진격로와 활동 양상", Tonghak yŏn’gu, 11, pp.31~71 (2002)
- 배항섭, "19세기 향촌사회질서의 변화와 새로운 공론의 대두－아래로부터 형성되는 새로운 정치질서－", 조선시대사학보, (71), pp.99~125 (2014), 조선시대사학회
- Pae Hangsŏp, "Also see Bae, Hang-seob", ~
- 박찬식, "한말 제주지역의 천주교회와 ‘濟州敎案’", Han’guk kŭnhyŏndaesa yŏn’gu, 4, pp.62~106 (1996)
- Raath, A., "Rebellion, Resistance, and a Swiss Brutus?", The Historical Journal, 48(1), pp.1~26 (2005)
- Rowe, William T., "China’s Last Empire: The Great Qing" (2009), Harvard University Press
- 佐藤文俊, (1985), Kenbunshuppan
- Scott, James C., "Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts" (1990), Yale University Press
- Scott, Tom, "The German Peasants’ War: A History in Documents" (1991), Humanities Press International
- 瀨原義生, (1988), Miraisha
- Setton, Mark, "Confucian Populism and Egalitarian Tendencies in Tonghak Thought", East Asian History, 20, pp.121~144 (2000)
- Shanin, Theodore, "Culture, Ideology, and Politics: Essays for Eric Hobsbawm", pp.227~244 (1982), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- 심희기, "<흠흠신서>의 법학사적 해부", Sahoe kwahak yŏn’gu, 5(2), pp.31~62 (1985)
- 신동규, "근세 일본 ‘島原天草의 亂’에 보이는 天草四郞의 신격화와 그 영향", 日本思想, (13), pp.122~162 (2007), 한국일본사상사학회
- 時事新報, ". Vol. 22", pp.275~346 (1996), Saun Yŏn’guso
- 송찬섭, "1862년 진주농민항쟁의 조직과 활동", 한국사론, 21, pp.317~370 (1989)
- Spence, Jonathan D., "God’s Chinese Son: The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom of Hong Xiuquan" (1996), W. W. Norton
- 須田努, (2002), Aoki Shoten
- 鈴木中正, (1982), Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai
- 谷川道雄, (1982), Heibonsha
- Thompson, Edward Palmer, "Customs in Common" (1993), Penguin Books
- 鶴卷孝雄, (1991), Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai
- Walraven, Boudewijn, "Cheju Island 1901: Records, Memories and Current Concerns", Korean Histories, 1(1), pp.3~24 (2009)
- Weems, Benjamin B., "Reform, Rebellion and the Heavenly Way" (1964), The University of Arizona Press
- Wunder, Heide, "‘Old Law’ and ‘Divine Law’ in the German Peasant War", The Journal of Peasant Studies, 3(1), pp.54~62 (1975)
- 藪田 貫, (1992), Azekura Shobo
- 이준갑, "民間傳說을 통해 본 明末淸初의 四川社會와 張獻忠 -傳說의 歷史學的 接近-", 중국사연구, (69), pp.309~357 (2010), 중국사학회
- 이돈화, (1933), Ch’ŏndogyo Chungang Chongniwŏn
- 윤대원, "이필제란 연구", Han’guksaron, 16, pp.127~207 (1987)
- 赵矢元, (1990), Ch’ŏngnyŏnsa