본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Withholding Taxes of U.S. Publicly Traded Partnerships under IRC Sections 1446(a) and 1446(f) :Minimizing the Tax-Leakage Through Proper Cross-Border Tax Compliance by Korean Taxpayers

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

[Purpose]This article examines the feasible solutions by applying for a refund of the excess withholding taxes over their relevant maximum U.S. tax liabilities through a formal income tax return at the status of non-resident alien (“NRA”) for both §1446(a) and §1446(f) taxes withheld in the U.S. [Methodology]A simulated exercise to investigate the correct refund compliances under the rules and regulations of U.S. tax law. The subsequent treatment of U.S. taxes paid on both active and passive business income that should be applicable to proper foreign tax credits upon filing a revised comprehensive income tax return under the Korean tax law. [Findings]The most likely tax treatment is for U.S.-sourced partnership distribution to be primarily taxable in the investor’s country of residence. In that case, taxes on that distribution would be paid in Korea. Since mandatory tax withholdings under §§1446(a) and 1446(f) were made in the U.S. on behalf of a Korean investor, that person would need to file a non-resident tax return in the U.S. to recover the taxes over-withheld. [Implications]After all, it is an investor’s individual choice whether or not to proceed with the refund application for excessive withholding tax. It is important to ensure that all of the reporting requirements are properly executed and that all of the rules and timelines are meticulously adhered to, to avoid losing the FTCs. That is just the way the whole system works.

Abstract

[Purpose]This article examines the feasible solutions by applying for a refund of the excess withholding taxes over their relevant maximum U.S. tax liabilities through a formal income tax return at the status of non-resident alien (“NRA”) for both §1446(a) and §1446(f) taxes withheld in the U.S. [Methodology]A simulated exercise to investigate the correct refund compliances under the rules and regulations of U.S. tax law. The subsequent treatment of U.S. taxes paid on both active and passive business income that should be applicable to proper foreign tax credits upon filing a revised comprehensive income tax return under the Korean tax law. [Findings]The most likely tax treatment is for U.S.-sourced partnership distribution to be primarily taxable in the investor’s country of residence. In that case, taxes on that distribution would be paid in Korea. Since mandatory tax withholdings under §§1446(a) and 1446(f) were made in the U.S. on behalf of a Korean investor, that person would need to file a non-resident tax return in the U.S. to recover the taxes over-withheld. [Implications]After all, it is an investor’s individual choice whether or not to proceed with the refund application for excessive withholding tax. It is important to ensure that all of the reporting requirements are properly executed and that all of the rules and timelines are meticulously adhered to, to avoid losing the FTCs. That is just the way the whole system works.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. "IRS Notice 2018-29", ~ (2018)
  2. "IRS Notice 2021-51", ~ (2021)
  3. "IRS Notice 2022-23", ~
  4. "IRS Private Letter Rulings 117-169", ~
  5. "IRS Revenue Procedure 2022-43", ~ (2022)
  6. "IRS Publication 515. Withholding of Tax on Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Entities", Department of Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service, ~ (2022)
  7. Cho. J. K, "Cross-Border Tax Implications in the U.S. CLO Equity Investing by the Qualified Korean Investors", Asset Management Review, 6(2), pp.17~44 (2018)
  8. Cho. J. K, "Cross-Border Tax Implications in the U.S. Pass-Through Taxation in Master Limited Partnership Interests and Lending", Asia Life Sciences, 28(2), pp.503~514 (2019)
  9. Cho. J. K, "An Investment Structuring of U.S. Real Properties by Korean Families and Cross-Border Tax Implications", Journal of Korean Law, 21(1), pp.55~111 (2022)
  10. Cho. J. K, "Internal Revenue Code Section 962 Election and Its Cross-Border Tax Compliance Implications", Journal of Korean Law, 22(1), pp.1~41 (2023)
  11. Proposed Changes to Qualified Intermediary (QI) Agreement, "KPMG", ~ (2023)
  12. Treasury Department, "General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2023Revenue Proposals", ~ (2023)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)