莊子 齊物論에 나타난 相對論의 問題

Abstract

In this article, I have shown what is problematic with interpreting the Chuang-tzu as an exposition in relativism. To this end, I have classified some of attempts to interpret the Chuang-tzu as a relativistic theory into five main types. But each of these types of interpretations on the question of relativism in the Chuang-tzu have the merits and the demerits. This interpretations seem to be somewhat arbitrary； in some cases they overlap and are not meant to be wholly faithful to each interpreter. I will put forth a fifth model of relativism, either relativism and non-relativism, which possesses the virtue of overcoming the demerits. The merit of the fifth model which I prefer to choose, is that it allows the various statements of both relativism and non-relativism to stand.