Evolution of High-Tech Start-Up Ecosystem Policy in India and China: A Comparative Perspective
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As the developed and developing economies make the transition to knowledge-based economies, the high-tech sector has been the primary engine in enabling this transformation. Given this context, the policy making and implementation abilities of the countries’ local administration assume significance. This study therefore attempts to examine the policy evolution undertaken by China and India which resulted in the emergence of high-tech startup ecosystems in these countries. Further, using a theoretical framework for an ideal entrepreneurial ecosystem, it tries to understand the similarities and differences prevalent currently in the Indian and Chinese high-tech startup ecosystem. The results of the study indicate that although both the countries took different paths, from a macro-perspective, they follow the same pattern as observed in the US and Israel policy making - that of the change in the role of Government as a regulator to that of an enabler of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. The differences and similarities between the key entrepreneurial ecosystem components provide additional knowledge about the currently prevailing conditions of the ecosystem in these countries.
Abstract
As the developed and developing economies make the transition to knowledge-based economies, the high-tech sector has been the primary engine in enabling this transformation. Given this context, the policy making and implementation abilities of the countries’ local administration assume significance. This study therefore attempts to examine the policy evolution undertaken by China and India which resulted in the emergence of high-tech startup ecosystems in these countries. Further, using a theoretical framework for an ideal entrepreneurial ecosystem, it tries to understand the similarities and differences prevalent currently in the Indian and Chinese high-tech startup ecosystem. The results of the study indicate that although both the countries took different paths, from a macro-perspective, they follow the same pattern as observed in the US and Israel policy making - that of the change in the role of Government as a regulator to that of an enabler of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. The differences and similarities between the key entrepreneurial ecosystem components provide additional knowledge about the currently prevailing conditions of the ecosystem in these countries.
참고문헌 (32)
- Arruda, C., "The Brazilian entrepreneurial eco-system of start-ups: an analysis of entrepreneurship determinants in Brazil as seen from the OECD pillars", Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 2(3), pp.17~57 (2013)
- Audretsch, D., "Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance", Regional Studies, 38(8), pp.949~959 (2004)
- Bala Subrahmanya, M. H., "New generation start-ups in India: what lessons can we learn from the past?", Economic and Political Weekly, 50(12), pp.56~63 (2015)
- Bala Subrahmanya, M.H., "Comparing the entrepreneurial ecosystems for technology start-ups in Bangalore and Hyderabad, India", Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7), pp.47~62 (2017)
- Implications of skill-biased technological change: international evidence, "Berman, E.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.W6166 (1997)
- Buxton, M.J., "Managing new technology: economics research and practical decisions", Health Services Management Research, 1(1), pp.43~50 (1988)
- "Center for Economic Studies and Kauffman Foundation Report" (2012)[URL]
- The Virtuous Cycle: Putting South Korea’s Startup Ecosystem on a Path to Sustainable Long-term Growth, Telecommunication, "Choi, W.", McKinsey Inc, ~ (2015)
- Cukier, D., "Software start-up ecosystems evolution: the New York city case study", Proceedings of 2nd international workshop on software start-ups, Trondheim: IEEE International Technology Management Conference (2016)
- Etzkowitz, H., "Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university-industry-government relations", Social Science Information, 42(3), pp.293~337 (2003)
- Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics, "Foster, G.", World Economic Forum, ~ (2013)
- Gilbert, B.A, "The emergence of entrepreneurship policy", Small Business Economics, 22(3-4), pp.313~323 (2004)
- The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship, "Isenberg, D.", Babson College, ~ (2011)
- Magesh, M., "Government funding for technology startups", DARE Magazine, 3(2), pp.26~27 (2009)
- Ministry of MSMEs, Government of India, "Recommendations of the Inter-Ministerial Committee for Accelerating Manufacturing in Micro", Small and Medium Enterprises Sector, Government of India, ~ (2013)
- Nambiar, P., "Indian software companies like Flipkart, Makemytrip, Inmobi inching close to $1 billion valuations", Economic Times, 9th November, ~ (2011)
- OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: China Synthesis Report, "OECD", OECD Publishing, ~ (2007)
- SME and entrepreneurship policy in Israel, "OECD", OECD Publishing, ~ (2016)
- Romer, P.M., "Increasing returns and long-run growth", Journal of Political Economy, pp.1002~1037 (1986)
- Saxenian, A., "Transnational communities and the evolution of global production networks: the cases of Taiwan, China and India", Industry and Innovation, 9, pp.183~202 (2002)
- Incubators in developing countries: status and development perspectives, "Scaramuzzi, E.", The World Bank, ~ (2002)
- Solow, R.M., "A contribution to the theory of economic growth", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp.65~94 (1956)
- Start-up Ecosystem Report 2015, "Start-up Genome", ~ (2015)
- Start-up Ecosystem Report 2018, "Start-up Genome", ~ (2018)
- Tang, M., "Technology business incubators in China and India: a comparative analysis", Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 16(2), pp.33~58 (2013)
- Economic Report 99, "The German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology", Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, ~ (1999)
- Wiklund J, "Building an integrative model of small business growth", Small Business Economics, 32, pp.351~374 (2009)