The Study on Retirement Age Adjustment Reflecting Possible Workability of Elderly Population
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to discern the determinants influencing the perception of workability among the elderly population and delineate an appropriate retirement age within the labor market context. Employing binary logistic regression, this research utilizes data from the Korea Welfare Panel Study (2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020) provided by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Welfare. The findings indicate that key factors shaping the elderly’s perception of workability encompass familial responsibilities (household and marital status) and their levels of physical and mental well-being. Econometric analysis suggests an anticipated retirement age for the elderly population ranging between 67 and 69 years. In addressing labor market demands and informing policymakers, the study proposes deliberations on extending the retirement age for individuals aged 60 to 65. This range serves as a compromise between the identified retirement age of 67 to 69 and the current average retirement age for elderly labor market participants. Bridging the disparity between the perceived workability age and the prevailing labor market baseline is crucial for achieving social consensus. Therefore, any extension of the retirement age should carefully consider both the demand and supply perspectives within the labor market. The study’s contribution lies in two main aspects: firstly, presenting a retirement age framework for the labor market that integrates the workability of the elderly population, and secondly, providing evidence-based research outcomes to guide informed labor policies.
Abstract
This study aims to discern the determinants influencing the perception of workability among the elderly population and delineate an appropriate retirement age within the labor market context. Employing binary logistic regression, this research utilizes data from the Korea Welfare Panel Study (2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020) provided by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Welfare. The findings indicate that key factors shaping the elderly’s perception of workability encompass familial responsibilities (household and marital status) and their levels of physical and mental well-being. Econometric analysis suggests an anticipated retirement age for the elderly population ranging between 67 and 69 years. In addressing labor market demands and informing policymakers, the study proposes deliberations on extending the retirement age for individuals aged 60 to 65. This range serves as a compromise between the identified retirement age of 67 to 69 and the current average retirement age for elderly labor market participants. Bridging the disparity between the perceived workability age and the prevailing labor market baseline is crucial for achieving social consensus. Therefore, any extension of the retirement age should carefully consider both the demand and supply perspectives within the labor market. The study’s contribution lies in two main aspects: firstly, presenting a retirement age framework for the labor market that integrates the workability of the elderly population, and secondly, providing evidence-based research outcomes to guide informed labor policies.
참고문헌 (30)
- Ahmed, A. M., "Does age matter for employability? A field experiment on ageism in the Swedish labour market", Applied Economics Letters, 19(4), pp.403~406 (2012)
- Bamg, H. N., "Baby Boom Generation: Who Are They?", Review of Labor, 2, pp.5~9 (2011)
- Barrington, L, "Ageism and bias in the American workplace", Generations, 39(3), pp.34~38 (2015)
- Caudroit, J., "Subjective Age and Social-Cognitive Determinants of Physical Activity in Active Older Adults", Journal of aging and physical activity, 20(4), pp.484~496 (2012)
- Cerino, E., "Investigating subjective age, level of activity, and depressive symptoms in older adults", Journal of Psychological Research, 20(4), pp.208~216 (2015)
- 차승은, "50대 남녀의 기대은퇴연령에 관한 연구:누가 빠른 은퇴를 원하는가?", 한국인구학, 35(2), pp.133~157 (2012), 한국인구학회
- Chang, C. J., "Mandatory Retirement Age Based on the Constitutional Equal Protection -", Study on The American Constitution, 28(2), pp.374~400 (2017)
- 장우찬, "노인일자리사업과 지속가능한 노동 ― 복지 그 자체로서의 노동 ―", 노동법학, (63), pp.65~101 (2017), 한국노동법학회
- 조동훈, "고령자 은퇴시점 결정요인 분석: 세대별 요인을 중심으로", 산업관계연구, 24(1), pp.47~66 (2014), 한국고용노사관계학회
- 최은영, "노년기 주관적 연령과 건강노화와의 관계: 연령집단별 분석", 보건사회연구, 37(1), pp.181~215 (2017), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- Choi, S. J., "An Aging Society Involving Every Generation: Experiences from Advanced Nations and Policy Directions in Korea" (2012), SNU Press
- Drydakis, N., "Age discrimination in the UK labour market, Does race moderate ageism? An experimental investigation", Applied economics letters, 25(1), pp.1~4 (2018)
- 지은정, "60세 이상 고령근로자의 생산성에 대한 인식연구: 통계적 차별과 접촉가설을 중심으로", 보건사회연구, 37(3), pp.73~109 (2017), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- 지은정, "노동시장의 연령주의(ageism) 측정도구 개발 및 타당성 연구", 한국사회복지행정학, 21(1), pp.1~30 (2019), 한국사회복지행정학회[DOI]
- A study on the employment status of the elderly in South Korea and the demand for elderly workforce by companies, "Ji, E. J.", Korea Labor Force Development Institute for the aged, ~ (2015)
- Jung, K. H, "The Age Criteria Debate and Policy Implications in the Centenarian Era", Health and Social Welfare Forum (2011)
- The Evolutionary Direction of Elderly Welfare Policies in Response to Demographic Changes, "Jung, K. H.", Korea Institute for Health and Social Welfare, ~ (2015)
- 김주현, "연령주의(Ageism) 관점을 통한 노년의 이해", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (82), pp.361~391 (2009), 한국사회사학회
- 김동선, "연령주의 관점에서 바라본 고령자 고용차별 인식", 사회과학연구, 23(4), pp.93~112 (2012), 사회과학연구소
- 김미령, "베이비붐세대 자원봉사활동이 사회통합감에 미치는 영향: 서울, 수도권 베이비부머를 중심으로", 한국노년학, 35(3), pp.765~783 (2015), 한국노년학회
- 김주현, "한국 고령자의 연령차별 경험과 노년기 인식 질적 연구", 한국인구학, 38(1), pp.69~104 (2015), 한국인구학회
- 이삼식, "고령자의 노인기준연령에 대한 인식이 사회참여에 미치는 영향", 사회과학연구, 30(2), pp.181~198 (2019), 사회과학연구소[DOI]
- Lee, S. W., "Application of Logit and Probit Model" (2005), Parkyoung Press
- The possibility and anticipated effects of adjusting the elderly age threshold, "Lee, T. S.", KDI, ~, pp.KDI FOCUS 115 (2022)
- 임공수, "고용상에서 ‘연령 요소’에 의한 차별", 고려법학, (85), pp.233~268 (2017), 법학연구원[DOI]
- Maddala, G.S, "Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Palmore, E.B, "Ageism: Negative and Positive" (1999), Springer Publishing Company
- Peters, M., "Older workers’ motivation to continue to work: five meanings of age", Journal of managerial psychology, 23(4), pp.364~394 (2008)
- Radl, J., "Too old to work, or too young to retire? The pervasiveness of age norms in Western Europe", Work, employment and society, 26(5), pp.755~771 (2012)
- Ruhm, C. J., "Does Drinking Really Decrease in Bad Times?", Journal of Health Economics, 21(4), pp.656~678 (2002)