본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대중매체에 제시된 종교 간의 대화에 대한 선교적 제언 ― <오 마이 갓>을 중심으로

A Missional Proposal on Interreligious Dialogue Presented in the Mass media: with <Oh, My God>

맹미영
한국복음주의선교신학회 (Korea Evangelical Missiological Society)|2015.03|복음과 선교 (EVANGELICAL MISSIOLOGY)|제29권 제1호|pp. 93-150

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

MissionMedia선교Mass MediaInterreligious DialogueEvangelism복음주의대중매체/매스미디어매체/미디어종교 간의 대화/대화

초록

Media, one of the most effective and powerful information delivery systems, vastly affect societies all over the world. Television is very powerful exercising far-reaching influence through frequency of practical use and use of time. On the other hand, interreligious dialogue is a ‘hot photo’ among religious issues. Since the twentieth century, one of the predominant problems is the relationship between Protestants and Catholics, or Evangelicalism (WEA) and Ecumenism (WCC) as well as relationship with other religions like Islam and Buddhism. It is clear that interreligious dialogue has an important position in terms of unity for world peace and missional perspective. In this situation, mass media, having an official position for the public (e.g., television) deals with the issue of interreligious dialogue in Korea. A cable television has broadcasted “Oh My God” program weekly, and it follows discussion procedure with topics connected with main issues in society and religious phenomena or questions. Though it does not have a great ripple effect, there is a need for observation about interreligious dialogue in mass media with missional perspective. It is because interreligious dialogue is communicated to the public through media. Although it must be reconsidered from a missionary aspect, there is also a need for discernment to realize the problems of interreligious dialogue with biblical and evangelical views in diverse religious situations like Korea. In existing mass media, there rarely were reports about religions from the modern worldview. Moreover, people understand that religion comes under the category of personal area, but mass media put in the public area due to dualism. However, mass media dealt with religion in various aspects for reasons of the remarkable growth of religion and great influence in society. It is surely encouraging that mass media handles a variety of the issues of contemporary societies and religions pending questions through religious leaders who are given authority as reliable social leaders in mass media which mostly reported religions having social problems. In this aspect <Oh My God> program in meaningful. Catholic, Buddhism, and WCC approach and understood interreligious dialogue form different dimensions of human beings. However, evangelism accepts and comprehends thoroughly interreligious dialogue in a missional position. Dialogue in evangelism is very important to understand other people, but its purpose and premise is certainly to preach the Gospel. According to Lausanne Covenant, dialogue of religious pluralism and syncretism is rejected based on distorted Gospel, and dialogue should be recognized as a tool for God’s mission. Interreligious discussion of “Oh My God” is not a biblical and evangelical dialogue in the real sense. It gives merely advice about present problems and helps to understand other people, but it is not dialogue in the missional view. It does not matter if interreligious dialogue is performed in the personal area without mass media, however, it is broadcasting through a public dialogue by religious leaders invited in this program. It is difficult to find the position of interreligious dialogue with a missional purpose. Therefore, Christians need to be concerned about the approach and to take a stand about sharing the Gospel. There is a need to form an image of Christianity through mass media in the missional aspect. First, there is the advance verification for the leader of Protestants. For this, the religious body should recommend a person who does his/her best to understand and approach interreligious dialogue. Second, Christians should distinguish the intention of viewers from the hidden intention of mass media. Mass media involves information with production crews and intention of planning the program. Leaders of each church should help establish evangelical views of interreligious dialogue through preaching, Bible study, and write-ups or articles. It should educate the people about religious dialogues from a genuine missional aspect. Interreligious dialogue for true mission is one a contextualization demanded by the changing of the times, a tool of communication for the Gospel. Like Jesus Christ, Christians inevitably will meet people of other religions and will be asked to convince through dialectic dialogue (dialogue together as one). Interreligious dialogues should also ask for clear foundation of the purpose and premise for the dialogue with other religions as well as encourage understanding from love and humility for the image of God.

Abstract

Media, one of the most effective and powerful information delivery systems, vastly affect societies all over the world. Television is very powerful exercising far-reaching influence through frequency of practical use and use of time. On the other hand, interreligious dialogue is a ‘hot photo’ among religious issues. Since the twentieth century, one of the predominant problems is the relationship between Protestants and Catholics, or Evangelicalism (WEA) and Ecumenism (WCC) as well as relationship with other religions like Islam and Buddhism. It is clear that interreligious dialogue has an important position in terms of unity for world peace and missional perspective. In this situation, mass media, having an official position for the public (e.g., television) deals with the issue of interreligious dialogue in Korea. A cable television has broadcasted “Oh My God” program weekly, and it follows discussion procedure with topics connected with main issues in society and religious phenomena or questions. Though it does not have a great ripple effect, there is a need for observation about interreligious dialogue in mass media with missional perspective. It is because interreligious dialogue is communicated to the public through media. Although it must be reconsidered from a missionary aspect, there is also a need for discernment to realize the problems of interreligious dialogue with biblical and evangelical views in diverse religious situations like Korea. In existing mass media, there rarely were reports about religions from the modern worldview. Moreover, people understand that religion comes under the category of personal area, but mass media put in the public area due to dualism. However, mass media dealt with religion in various aspects for reasons of the remarkable growth of religion and great influence in society. It is surely encouraging that mass media handles a variety of the issues of contemporary societies and religions pending questions through religious leaders who are given authority as reliable social leaders in mass media which mostly reported religions having social problems. In this aspect <Oh My God> program in meaningful. Catholic, Buddhism, and WCC approach and understood interreligious dialogue form different dimensions of human beings. However, evangelism accepts and comprehends thoroughly interreligious dialogue in a missional position. Dialogue in evangelism is very important to understand other people, but its purpose and premise is certainly to preach the Gospel. According to Lausanne Covenant, dialogue of religious pluralism and syncretism is rejected based on distorted Gospel, and dialogue should be recognized as a tool for God’s mission. Interreligious discussion of “Oh My God” is not a biblical and evangelical dialogue in the real sense. It gives merely advice about present problems and helps to understand other people, but it is not dialogue in the missional view. It does not matter if interreligious dialogue is performed in the personal area without mass media, however, it is broadcasting through a public dialogue by religious leaders invited in this program. It is difficult to find the position of interreligious dialogue with a missional purpose. Therefore, Christians need to be concerned about the approach and to take a stand about sharing the Gospel. There is a need to form an image of Christianity through mass media in the missional aspect. First, there is the advance verification for the leader of Protestants. For this, the religious body should recommend a person who does his/her best to understand and approach interreligious dialogue. Second, Christians should distinguish the intention of viewers from the hidden intention of mass media. Mass media involves information with production crews and intention of planning the program. Leaders of each church should help establish evangelical views of interreligious dialogue through preaching, Bible study, and write-ups or articles. It should educate the people about religious dialogues from a genuine missional aspect. Interreligious dialogue for true mission is one a contextualization demanded by the changing of the times, a tool of communication for the Gospel. Like Jesus Christ, Christians inevitably will meet people of other religions and will be asked to convince through dialectic dialogue (dialogue together as one). Interreligious dialogues should also ask for clear foundation of the purpose and premise for the dialogue with other religions as well as encourage understanding from love and humility for the image of God.

참고문헌 (95)

  1. 교회일치위원회, "에큐메니즘과 선교-한국 그리스도교 일치를 향하여", 교회와 세계, (214)
  2. 국제위원회, "에큐메니즘과 선교-오순절 성령운동과 WCC 대화모임", 교회와 세계, (214)
  3. 국제위원회, "에큐메니즘과 선교–종교대화: 평화와 화해를 실현하는 한 방편 – Hans Ucko 박사와의 대화", 교회와 세계, (214)
  4. 권문상, "W.C.C.의 사회구원적 기독론에 대한 비판적 분석", 개혁논총, 19, pp.111~145 (2011), 개혁신학회
  5. 김경식, "협력선교를 위한 선교동원 방법론에 관한 고찰 ―영상콘텐츠 활용을 중심으로", 복음과 선교, 18(2), pp.99~120 (2012), 한국복음주의선교신학회[DOI]
  6. 김승호, "복음주의관점에서 본 WCC의 타종교 입장에 대한 비평적 고찰", 성경과 신학, 64, pp.89~112 (2012), 한국복음주의신학회
  7. 김승호, "종교다원주의시대 한국 복음주의 교회 선교를 위한 종교신학 개발", 복음과 선교, 14(1), pp.125~149 (2011), 한국복음주의선교신학회
  8. 김은수, "2010년 케이프타운 로잔3차대회의 의미와 과제", 선교신학, 26(26), pp.37~67 (2011), 한국선교신학회
  9. 김준철, "선교적 관점에서 본 한국 천주교와 개신교의 대화와 협력", 사목연구, 28(겨울), pp.198~225 (2011)
  10. 김홍관, "세계 선교의 상황 변화와 종교간의 대화", 선교신학, 20(20), pp.11~41 (2009), 한국선교신학회
  11. 김홍만, "WCC의 타종교와의 대화에서 나타난 선교 신학", 선교타임즈 (2013)
  12. 네틀랜드, 헤롤드 A., "기독교와 타종교: 세계종교에 대한 성경적 신학" (1998), 서로 사랑
  13. 로잔운동, "케이프타운 서약: 하나님의 선교를 위한 복음주의 헌장" (2014), 한국기독학생회출판부
  14. 맥루한, 마샬, "미디어의 이해" (2001), 커뮤니케이션북스
  15. 롬멘, 에드워드, "기독교와 타종교: 세계종교에 대한 성경적 신학" (1998), 서로 사랑
  16. 미킹, 바질, "복음주의와 가톨릭의 대화 - 제1·2·3차 복음주의·가톨릭 선교회의 (ERCDOM, 1977~1984) 보고서 요약", 목회와 신학 (1989)
  17. 민병현, "TV 시사다큐멘터리 영상구성방식과사실성 구현에 관한 연구 : KBS, MBC, SBS를 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 53(3), pp.268~296 (2009), 한국언론학회
  18. 박영환, "로잔운동과 선교", pp.201~223 (2014), 한국로잔위원회
  19. 박진규, "미디어의 종교담론 생산과 그 정당화 - TV 다큐멘터리 <신의 길 인간의 길> 사례를 중심으로", 한국방송학보, 22(6), pp.110~148 (2008), 한국방송학회
  20. 소윤정, "로잔신학에 나타난 타종교와의 대화", 복음과 선교, 27(3), pp.59~99 (2014), 한국복음주의선교신학회
  21. 소윤정, "영화 <바세코의 아이들>의 미디어 선교 전략적 함의", 복음과 선교, 28(4), pp.121~157 (2014), 한국복음주의선교신학회
  22. 소윤정, "WCC의 타종교 선교정책에 관한 비판적 고찰 ― NCCK 신학노선을 중심으로", 복음과 선교, 17(1), pp.75~106 (2012), 한국복음주의선교신학회[DOI]
  23. 윤서태, "제2차 바티칸 공의회 선교신학에 대한 고찰", KMQ, (봄) (2013)
  24. 이동주, "현대선교신학: 복음주의 입장에서 본 종교다원주의와 세속화 신학" (2003), 기독교문서선교회
  25. 이동주, "WCC 선교신학 연구" (2013), 선교신학연구소
  26. 이선영, "미디어의 종교보도를 위한 제언: TV 다큐멘터리 <신의 길, 인간의 길>을 통해서", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 11(12), pp.658~673 (2011), 한국콘텐츠학회
  27. 이복수, "종교다원주의 발생과 발전에 대한 고찰", 복음과 선교, 7, pp.97~133 (2006)
  28. 이용원, "빌링겐에서 나이로비까지-선교신학적 고찰", 선교와 신학, 4, pp.67~100 (1999)
  29. 이현모, "종교다원주의에 대한 이해와 대처", 목회와 신학 (1999)
  30. 이현모, "‘타종교와의 대화’에 대한 침례교회의 견해 평가", 복음과 실천, 53, pp.189~212 (2014)
  31. 이형기, "다종교 사회에서 그리스도인의 증언: WCC와 교황청 산하 종교 간 대화평의회와 세계복음주의 연맹 사이의 대화(2011.6.28.)에 대한 논평", KMQ, (봄) (2013)
  32. 장석만, "매스미디어와 종교-텔레비전은 종교문제를 어떻게 다루고 있는가", 사회비평, (33), pp.159~177 (2002)
  33. 정기묵, "뉴미디어 시대와 미디어 선교", 선교와신학, (32), pp.77~110 (2013), 세계선교연구원
  34. 정기묵, "선교 대상으로서 사이버자아에 관한 연구", 박사, 선교신학, pp.2010
  35. 정기묵, "제3차 로잔대회의 케이프타운 서약에 나타난미디어 선교와 한국 교회의 전략", 복음과 선교, 22(2), pp.83~111 (2013), 한국복음주의선교신학회
  36. 정승현, "현대 문화와 하나님의 선교: 세계화와 매스 미디어에 대한 선교적 응답", 선교와신학, (27), pp.309~341 (2011), 세계선교연구원
  37. 정흥호, "복음과 상황화" (2004), 기독교문서선교회
  38. 조종남, "세계복음화를 위한 로잔 운동의 역사와 신학" (2013), 선교횃불
  39. 최원진, "WCC의 종교간 대화에 대한 복음주의의 선교적 답변", 복음과 선교, 19(3), pp.81~112 (2012), 한국복음주의선교신학회
  40. 최형근, "제3차 로잔대회 케이프타운 서약의 특징과 의의", 복음과 선교, 22(2), pp.113~150 (2013), 한국복음주의선교신학회
  41. 한상용, "뉴미디어 시대의 문화와 선교", 기독교사상, (38), pp.39~58 (1994)
  42. 홍기영, "로잔세계복음화운동의 선교신학적 고찰 (상) ―로잔언약, 마닐라선언, 케이프타운헌신을 중심으로", 복음과 선교, 22(2), pp.151~194 (2013), 한국복음주의선교신학회
  43. 황병배, "미디어 선교를 통한 기독교 커뮤니케이션", 선교신학, 26(26), pp.309~333 (2011), 한국선교신학회
  44. 황대우, "2차 바티칸 공의회에 대한 복음주의적 평가", KMQ, (봄) (2013)
  45. Beyerhaus, Peter, "현대선교변증" (2004), 기독교문서선교회
  46. Bosch, David J., "변화하고 있는 선교" (2000), 기독교문서선교회
  47. Forman, Charles W., "선교신학의 21세기 동향" (2011), 이레서원
  48. Hiebert, Paul, "21세기 선교와 세계관의 변화: 복음은 어떻게 사람을 바꾸는가" (2010), 복 있는 사람
  49. McLuhan, Marshall, "미디어의 이해: 인간의 확장(비평판)" (2011), 커뮤니케이션북스
  50. Newbigin, Lesslie, "다원주의 사회에서의 복음" (2011), 한국기독학생회출판부
  51. Sundermeier, Theo, "다원주의 사회 속에서의 선교와 대화", 신학사상, 107(겨울), pp.112~130 (1999)
  52. A. 스캇 모로우, "선교학 사전" (2014), 기독교문서선교회
  53. A. 스캇 모로우, "선교학 사전" (2014), 기독교문서선교회
  54. 칼 뮐러, "선교학사전" (2003), 다산글방
  55. 칼 뮐러, "선교학사전" (2003), 다산글방
  56. Best, Steven, "The Postmodern Turn" (1997), The Guilford Press
  57. Bosch, David J., "Transforming Mission: Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission" (2002), Orbis Books
  58. Carey, J. W., "Preface", Journal of Media and Religion, 1(1), pp.1~3 (2002)
  59. Goodall, N., "Ecumenical Progress: A Decade of Change in the Ecumenical Movement 1961-1971" (1972), Oxford University Press
  60. Hedlund, Roger E., "Roots of the Great Debate in Mission: Mission in Historical and Theological Perspective" (1993), Theological Book Trust
  61. Hinsdon, Ed., "The Popular Encyclopedia of Apologetics: Surveying the Evidence for the Truth of Christianity" (2008), Harvest house publishers
  62. Hoover, S. M., "Religion in the News: Faith and Journalism in American Public Discourse" (1998), Sage
  63. Kinnamon, Michael, "The Ecumenical Movement: An Anthology of Key Texts and Voices" (1997), Wm B. Eerdmans Publishing Co
  64. Netland, Harold A., "Dissonant Vices: Religious Pluralism and the Question of Truth" (1991), Eerdmans Publishing Co
  65. Orchard, Ronald K., "Witness in Six Continents: Records of the Meeting of the CWME of the WCC held in Mexico City" (1964), Edinburgh House Press
  66. Scherer, James A., "Gospel, Church, & Kingdom: Comparative Studies in World Mission Theology" (1987), Augsburg
  67. Schudson, Michael, "The Sociology of News Production", Media, Culture and Society, 11, pp.263~282 (1989)
  68. Sharpe, Eric J., "Truth and Dialogue in World Religions" (1974), Westiminster
  69. Smith, Wilfred Cantwell, "The Faith of Other Men" (1965), New American Library
  70. Stott, John, "Christian Mission in the Modern World" (1975), InterVarsity Press
  72. "네이버 사전 “대중매체” 항목" (2015)[URL]
  73. "네이버 사전 “미디어” 항목" (2015)[URL]
  74. "네이버 사전 “토 크쇼” 검색 항목" (2015)[URL]
  82. "<오 마이 갓> 홈페이지"[URL]
  83. "<종교인들의 세상 이야기> 홈페이지"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

WCC의 종교간 대화에 대한 복음주의의 선교적 답변최원진한국복음주의선교신학회 · 복음과 선교2012 · 제19권 제3호로잔신학에 나타난 타종교와의 대화소윤정한국복음주의선교신학회 · 복음과 선교2014 · 제27권 제3호A Cultural Dialogue on Foundation for Inter-Religious Dialogue in Korea Context최태수한국기독교사회윤리학회 · 기독교사회윤리2005 · 제9호한국 기독교의 선교방송 편성 현황과 운영 개선 필요성이장형한국기독교사회윤리학회 · 기독교사회윤리2013 · 제26호종교다원주의로 인한 사회 문화적 가치 변동에 따른 선교 전략노윤식한국복음주의선교신학회 · 복음과 선교2010 · 제13권 제1호A New Paradigm for Overcoming Problems of Evangelism in the Korean Protestant Church최동규한국실천신학회 · 신학과 실천2009 · 제21호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

통전적 선교 - 복음선포와 증명의 조화김수미pp. 1-46장년 선교사의 증가를 어떻게 볼 것인가?김한성pp. 47-91선교해석학적 관점에서 본 복음주의의 두 기본 신학신경규pp. 151-187한국전쟁 이후 선교사 괴테 박사(Dr. Robert L. Goette; 한국명 계의돈)의 사역과 삶(1960-1987)에 대한 고찰이정순pp. 189-2322018년 인구 절벽시대의 기독교 선교전략장훈태pp. 233-280
원문 보기