본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중학교 국사 교육과 지역사 학습 - 진주지역을 중심으로 -

National History Education and the Learning of Local History in Middle School - Based on Jinju Area -

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This study examined the actual state of learning of local history in national history education for middle school students, with a focus on the learning of local history, a part of history education. It carried out research on local history based on Jinju area, identifying problems of learning of local history in middle school national history course and seeking resolutions of the problems. In order to grasp the actual state of learning of local history in Jinju area, surveys involving teachers and students and an analysis on the outcomes of experiments on local history class were conducted. The result is presented as follow:According to the results of the survey involving 52 teachers (47.7%) who were teaching or had taught history in middle schools in Jinju, up to 94.2% of the teachers thought that the learning of local history needed to be carried out, but only 48.1% were found to have actually delivered classes on local history, indicating that the teachers had a lack of willingness to actually deliver classes on local history. This is largely due to the pressure to teach a great deal of content during classes, a lack of efficient teaching materials and a lack of ability to produce teaching materials. In addition, the fact that teachers who majored in history account for only 5.8% may weaken the quality of overall history education as well as learning of local history. The results of the survey involving 691students (4.7%) showed that 75.3% of the students regarded the learning of local history as necessary. This indicates that the students had positive perception of local history class. However, students who had ever received classes on local history accounted for only 26.5%, suggesting that classes on local history were not being delivered properly. In order to grasp the effect of local history class, experiments on local history class were analyzed. The results of the experiments showed that after learning local history, students showed improvements in their interest in history and local history and came to put more value on local history class. That is, it was proved that local history class can not only deliver knowledge on local history but also arouse students‘ interest in Korean history. Finally, teachers need to study local history and participate in small group research activities to teach local history confidently. In addition, middle and high school history teachers need to work together, exchanging opinions. Furthermore, training programs for middle school teachers should continue to be carried out. Delivering training programs or lectures regularly for teachers in Jinju in connection with universities or museums which are located in the area can be a good alternative.

Abstract

This study examined the actual state of learning of local history in national history education for middle school students, with a focus on the learning of local history, a part of history education. It carried out research on local history based on Jinju area, identifying problems of learning of local history in middle school national history course and seeking resolutions of the problems. In order to grasp the actual state of learning of local history in Jinju area, surveys involving teachers and students and an analysis on the outcomes of experiments on local history class were conducted. The result is presented as follow:According to the results of the survey involving 52 teachers (47.7%) who were teaching or had taught history in middle schools in Jinju, up to 94.2% of the teachers thought that the learning of local history needed to be carried out, but only 48.1% were found to have actually delivered classes on local history, indicating that the teachers had a lack of willingness to actually deliver classes on local history. This is largely due to the pressure to teach a great deal of content during classes, a lack of efficient teaching materials and a lack of ability to produce teaching materials. In addition, the fact that teachers who majored in history account for only 5.8% may weaken the quality of overall history education as well as learning of local history. The results of the survey involving 691students (4.7%) showed that 75.3% of the students regarded the learning of local history as necessary. This indicates that the students had positive perception of local history class. However, students who had ever received classes on local history accounted for only 26.5%, suggesting that classes on local history were not being delivered properly. In order to grasp the effect of local history class, experiments on local history class were analyzed. The results of the experiments showed that after learning local history, students showed improvements in their interest in history and local history and came to put more value on local history class. That is, it was proved that local history class can not only deliver knowledge on local history but also arouse students‘ interest in Korean history. Finally, teachers need to study local history and participate in small group research activities to teach local history confidently. In addition, middle and high school history teachers need to work together, exchanging opinions. Furthermore, training programs for middle school teachers should continue to be carried out. Delivering training programs or lectures regularly for teachers in Jinju in connection with universities or museums which are located in the area can be a good alternative.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 교육인적자원부, "중학교 국사 교사용 지도서" (2007), 교학사
  2. 김준형, "1862년 진주농민항쟁" (2001), 지식산업사
  3. 김중섭, "형평운동" (2001), 지식산업사
  4. 김한종, "역사교육과 역사인식" (2005), 책과함께
  5. 김한종, "역사교육과정과 교과서 연구" (2008), 선인문화사
  6. 김한종, "역사교육의 이해" (2009), 책과함께
  7. 송춘영, "역사교육의 이론과 실제" (2001), 형설출판사
  8. 양호완, "역사 교육의 이론과 방법" (2001), 삼지원
  9. 이기백, "역사교육, 무엇을 어떻게 가르칠까" (2002), 소화
  10. 이원순, "역사교육론" (1991), 삼영사
  11. 이존희, "역사교육, 달라져야 한다" (2001), 혜안
  12. 이해준, "지역사와 지역문화론" (2001), 문화닷컴
  13. 전국역사교사모임, "살아있는 한국사 교과서1, 2" (2002), 휴머니스트
  14. 전국역사교사모임, "역사교사로 산다는 것" (2008), 너머북스
  15. 전국역사교사모임, "역사 무엇을 어떻게 가르칠까" (2008), 휴머니스트
  16. 정선영, "역사교육의 이해" (2001), 삼지원
  17. 조영제, "진주의 선사, 가야문화" (2004), 지식산업사
  18. 진주농민항쟁기념사업회, "진주농민운동의 역사적 조명" (2003), 역사비평사
  19. 최완기, "역사학습 지도의 원리와 실제" (2000), 느티나무
  20. 김갑인, "중학교 역사교육과 지방사 학습:여수지역을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2002
  21. 유승광, "중학교 역사교육에서 지역사 교육과정의 구성:서천 지역을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2005
  22. 배수일, "향토사 자료를 활용한 국사 학습 지도방안 연구:구미지역의 서원 자료를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2003
  23. 김경민, "역사교육에서 지역사 자료의 활용에 대한 연구:경기도 포천지역을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2004
  24. 김경희, "컴퓨터를 이용한 학습자 중심의 향토사 수업방안:진주지역을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2006
  25. 김영철, "역사교육에서 지역사 자료의 활용에 대한 연구:경기도 포천지역을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2004
  26. 권옥영, "수행평가를 활용한 향토사 지도방안:순천 지역의 향토 문화재를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2005
  27. 김영칠, "향토사 학습의 효율성 강화를 위한 수업 방안 연구:경기도 의정부 지역을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2007
  28. 김은숙, "중학교에서 지역 문화재를 활용한 향토사 학습지도:논산 지역의 사회교육시설 활용을 통하여", 석사, pp.2005
  29. 양승진, "사진자료를 이용한 향토 근대사 지도 연구", 석사, pp.2003
  30. 박승규, "진주인의 항쟁운동과 그 의식에 관한 고찰:근대격동기를 중심으로", 진주문화, (7) (1986), 진주교육대학교부설 진주문화권연구소
  31. 김준형, "진주 주변에서의 왜적 방어와 의병활동", 경남문화연구, (17) (1995), 경상대학교 경남문화연구소
  32. 김찬섭, "1862년 진주농민항쟁의 조직과 활동", 한국사론, (21) (1989), 서울대학교 인문대학 국사학과
  33. 김중섭, "1920년대 형평운동의 형성과정", 동방학지, (59) (1988), 연세대학교국학연구원
  34. 박성식, "임진왜란의 연구:임진,계사년 진주성 전투를 중심으로", 박사, pp.1985
  35. 차행천, "역사유적을 통한 중학교 지방사교육:여수지역의 예를 중심으로", 석사, pp.1999

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)