본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

요건사실로서의 운행에 관한 소고

A analysing study about operation concept

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Under the premise that an automobile can be included in the concept of operating that the automobile is understood as the means of tool of transportation under the circumstance of the use or management, the automobile is responsible for taking out a liability insurance policy of the Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Loss Caused by Automobile. If such automobile is used by the stated circumstance, any accidents during the use or management of the automobile can be considered accidents by operation. This way of defining a concept of operation is more helpful to protect victims by the automobile as a means of transportation. In addition, the meaning of operation becomes clear and the predictability of operation can be given, therefore debates about the concept of operation will surely decrease. According to the article 726-2 of Commercial Act, the insurer of the automobile insurance contract shall be bound to indemnify for any loss by accidents which have occurred while the insured owns, uses and manages automobile. The Standardized Contract of Comprehensive Automobile Accident Insurance implies that the article 726-2 regarding Personal Indemnification I, Personal Indemnification II, and Substitute Indemnification. These grounds considered, the 'ownership' provided in the article 726-2 is understood as one who is responsible for loss while the insured has the control of operation over the insured automobile with the interest of operation. Then the meaning of the ownership should be understood that it is identical to the driver of the Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Loss Caused by Automobile, and the 'use or management' of the article 726-2 should be thought that it is restrained by the automobile usage same as it is restricted by the Act. Therefore it should be considered that the article 726-2 of Commercial Act is a provision that the insurer has a responsibility to indemnify for any loss by accidents which have occurred while operated by the driver of the Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Loss Caused by Automobile.

Abstract

Under the premise that an automobile can be included in the concept of operating that the automobile is understood as the means of tool of transportation under the circumstance of the use or management, the automobile is responsible for taking out a liability insurance policy of the Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Loss Caused by Automobile. If such automobile is used by the stated circumstance, any accidents during the use or management of the automobile can be considered accidents by operation. This way of defining a concept of operation is more helpful to protect victims by the automobile as a means of transportation. In addition, the meaning of operation becomes clear and the predictability of operation can be given, therefore debates about the concept of operation will surely decrease. According to the article 726-2 of Commercial Act, the insurer of the automobile insurance contract shall be bound to indemnify for any loss by accidents which have occurred while the insured owns, uses and manages automobile. The Standardized Contract of Comprehensive Automobile Accident Insurance implies that the article 726-2 regarding Personal Indemnification I, Personal Indemnification II, and Substitute Indemnification. These grounds considered, the 'ownership' provided in the article 726-2 is understood as one who is responsible for loss while the insured has the control of operation over the insured automobile with the interest of operation. Then the meaning of the ownership should be understood that it is identical to the driver of the Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Loss Caused by Automobile, and the 'use or management' of the article 726-2 should be thought that it is restrained by the automobile usage same as it is restricted by the Act. Therefore it should be considered that the article 726-2 of Commercial Act is a provision that the insurer has a responsibility to indemnify for any loss by accidents which have occurred while operated by the driver of the Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Loss Caused by Automobile.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김주동, "자동차보험론" (1999), 형설출판사
  2. 김효신, "보험법의 법리" (2005), 경북대학교출판부
  3. 박세민, "자동차보험법의 이론과 실무" (2007), 세창출판사
  4. 오지용, "불법행위의 법리" (2010), 진원사
  5. 이보환, "자동차사고손해배상소송(개정증보)" (1990), 육법사
  6. 이은영, "채권각론" (2000), 박영사
  7. 자동차손해배상보장법 개정법률안 심사보고서 및 검토보고서, "국회건설교통위원회", 건설교통부, ~ (1998)
  8. 김은경, "자동차손해배상보장법상 운행의 개념에 관한 법적 고찰", 상사법연구, 24(3), pp.149~181 (2005), 한국상사법학회
  9. 이병석, "자동차손해배상보장법상의 운행개념", 보험학회지, 55 (2000), 한국보험학회
  10. 조규성, "자동차손해배상보장법 제3조상의 운행기인성에 관한 판례연구 (대법원 2009. 4. 9. 선고 2008다93629판결)", 법학연구, 50(1), pp.81~101 (2009), 법학연구소
  11. 하헌주, "자동차손해배상보장법의 '운행'과 상법 제726조의 2의 '자동차의 소유, 사용 또는 관리'의 개념에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (35), pp.233~257 (2009), 한국법학회
  12. 한기정, "자동차손해배상보장법상의 운행의 개념에 관한 연구", 서울대학교 법학, 49(3), pp.213~240 (2008), 법학연구소
  13. 홍승인, "보험에서의 자동차 “운행” 개념 ― 각국의 태도와 우리나라의 해석기준 ―", 상사법연구, 22(4), pp.267~293 (2003), 한국상사법학회
  14. 大嶋芳樹, "自賠法3條の運行起因性に關する紛爭處理事例, in 損害賠償法の軌跡と展望" (2008), 平文社
  15. 小沼進一, "運行者”,in 現代判例民法學の課題 : 森泉章敎授還曆記念論集" (1988), 法學書院

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)