읽기 영역 오류문항 분석 - 제21회∼제22회 한국어능력시험 문항을 중심으로 -
Analysis of the error items on the area of reading on the focus of items of the 21th and the 22th of the TOPIK.
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at extracting the error questions and clarifying to notable points of reading questions with regard to the degree of difficulty and discrimination of TOPIK(Test of Proficiency in Korean) levels. This study is the first to analyze 30 question items per level, which are classified by selective type based on the answers of the 21th and the 22th TOPIK using the Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory. As the result of analyzing the answers, this study suggests increasing question difficulty in the novice level and expanding the degree of discrimination in the advanced level. The object data used in analysis of the answers of the 21th and the 22th TOPIK in the area of reading are 1 question item from the novice level, 10 from in the middle level, and 17 from the advanced level. Each question included was below .64 in the low degree of discrimination. As the result, 5 items had problems. The first principle of making these questions is that the text should satisfy the purpose of the exam and it should include only one topic sentence. Secondly, the content and the words used in the ansxer sheet should be given correctly.
Abstract
This study aims at extracting the error questions and clarifying to notable points of reading questions with regard to the degree of difficulty and discrimination of TOPIK(Test of Proficiency in Korean) levels. This study is the first to analyze 30 question items per level, which are classified by selective type based on the answers of the 21th and the 22th TOPIK using the Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory. As the result of analyzing the answers, this study suggests increasing question difficulty in the novice level and expanding the degree of discrimination in the advanced level. The object data used in analysis of the answers of the 21th and the 22th TOPIK in the area of reading are 1 question item from the novice level, 10 from in the middle level, and 17 from the advanced level. Each question included was below .64 in the low degree of discrimination. As the result, 5 items had problems. The first principle of making these questions is that the text should satisfy the purpose of the exam and it should include only one topic sentence. Secondly, the content and the words used in the ansxer sheet should be given correctly.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김유정, "한국어능력시험의 난이도 분석 연구", 한국어교육, 17(1), pp.21~46 (2006), 국제한국어교육학회
- 김의수, "TOPIK 읽기 영역 지문의 난이도와 균질성에 관한 통사론적 접근", 한국언어문학, 18(71), pp.189~213 (2009), 한국언어문학회
- 김재춘, "교육과정과 교육평가" (2000), 교육과학사
- 김석우, "교육평가-이해와 적용-" (2007), 교육과학사
- 성태제, "문항반응이론 입문" (1991), 양서원
- 성태제, "문항제작 및 분석의 이론과 실제" (1996), 학지사
- 성태제, "문항반응이론의 이해와 적용" (2001), 교육과학사
- 성태제, "교육평가의 기초" (2009), 학지사
- 이준호, "‘한국어능력시험’에서의 추론 기술 평가 연구－ 이해 영역을 중심으로－", 한국어학, 46, pp.317~351 (2010), 한국어학회
- 이해영, "한국어 이해능력 평가의 원리 및 실제", 한국어교육, 16(3), pp.275~304 (2005), 국제한국어교육학회
- 장은아, "한국어능력시험의 성별에 따른 차별기능문항 분석", 이중언어학, (32), pp.291~325 (2006), 이중언어학회
- 전은주, "한국어 능력 시험 평가 문항의 내용타당도 분석 -제12회 일반 한국어(S-TOPIK)의 쓰기 듣기 읽기 영역을 중심으로", 국어교육학연구, (31), pp.129~165 (2008), 국어교육학회
- 조인옥, "한국어능력 평가 답안 분석 - 제12회 한국어능력시험 수험자 반응 연구 -", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 32, pp.237~258 (2007), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- Baker. F. B., "The Basic of Item Response Theory, Portsmouth" (1985), Heinemann
- Binet, A., "The development of intelligence in young children" (1916), The Training School
- Madaus,. G. F., "Curriculum evaluation and assessment, In Handbook of Research on Curriculum, A project of the American Educational Research Association" (1992), Macmillan