본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparing Lexical Diversity and Lexical Sophistication in Korean EFL Writing: Topic and Text Length

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The study explores the effects of topic on lexical diversity and lexical sophistication in Korean university students’ English writing with and without text length control. Topic effect was initially examined under two sets of writing contexts: the same topic and different topics and later again under the same condition with the only difference being in text length (shortened into 200-word writing). Lexical diversity and lexical sophistication were measured using VocabProfile that produces type-token ratio (TTR) and lexical frequency profile (LFP). Lexical diversity was measured by TTR, and lexical sophistication was measured by academic word list (AWL) and off the list words (OLW) from the four lexical frequency lists generated by VocabProfile. Statistical analysis revealed that topic had a large impact on lexical diversity and lexical sophistication. Also, text length effect was not pronounced in this traditional TTR and LFP analysis. Rather, the number of word types (i.e., the number of different words) appeared as a more influential factor to determine TTR and LFP values. This finding indicates that topic plays an important role in EFL writing. Further study is needed to confirm these study results using other lexical analysis programs. Findings and implications are discussed.

Abstract

The study explores the effects of topic on lexical diversity and lexical sophistication in Korean university students’ English writing with and without text length control. Topic effect was initially examined under two sets of writing contexts: the same topic and different topics and later again under the same condition with the only difference being in text length (shortened into 200-word writing). Lexical diversity and lexical sophistication were measured using VocabProfile that produces type-token ratio (TTR) and lexical frequency profile (LFP). Lexical diversity was measured by TTR, and lexical sophistication was measured by academic word list (AWL) and off the list words (OLW) from the four lexical frequency lists generated by VocabProfile. Statistical analysis revealed that topic had a large impact on lexical diversity and lexical sophistication. Also, text length effect was not pronounced in this traditional TTR and LFP analysis. Rather, the number of word types (i.e., the number of different words) appeared as a more influential factor to determine TTR and LFP values. This finding indicates that topic plays an important role in EFL writing. Further study is needed to confirm these study results using other lexical analysis programs. Findings and implications are discussed.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Baba, K., "Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language", Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(3), pp.191~208 (2009)
  2. "VocabProfile program" (2013)[URL]
  3. Coxhead, A., "A new academic word list", TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), pp.213~238 (2000)
  4. Crossley, S. A., "Predicting second language writing proficiency : The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication", Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), pp.115~135 (2012)
  5. Crossley, S. A., "Predicting the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices", Language Testing, 29(2), pp.243~263 (2012)
  6. Crossley, S. A., "Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices", Language Testing, 28(4), pp.561~580 (2011)
  7. Daller, H., "Lexical richness in spontaneous speech of bilinguals", Applied Linguistics, 24(2), pp.197~222 (2003)
  8. deBoer, F., "Evaluating the comparability of two measures of lexical diversity", System, 47, pp.139~145 (2014)
  9. Durán, P., "Developmental trends in lexical diversity", Applied Linguistics, 25(2), pp.220~242 (2004)
  10. Engber, C. A., "The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), pp.139~155 (1995)
  11. Frear, M. W., "The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity", Journal of Second Language Writing, 30(4), pp.45~57 (2015)
  12. Gebril, A., "Source-based tasks in academic writing assessment : Lexical diversity, textual borrowing and proficiency", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, pp.78~88 (2016)
  13. Guo, L., "Predicting human judgements of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples : A comparison study", Assessing Writing, 18(3), pp.218~238 (2013)
  14. Henricksen, B., "Three dimensions of vocabulary development", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), pp.303~317 (1999)
  15. Hyland, K., "Academic lexis and disciplinary practice : Corpus evidence for specificity", International Journal of English Studies, 9(2), pp.111~129 (2009)
  16. Jarvis, S., "Short texts, best fitting curves, and new measures of lexical diversity", Language Testing, 19(1), pp.57~84 (2002)
  17. Kenworthy, R., "Timed versus at-home assessment tests: Does time affect the quality of second language learners’ written compositions?", TESL-EJ, 10(1), pp.10~22 (2006)
  18. Kim, Bomin, "Korean college EFL learners’ task motivation in written language production", International Education Studies, 9(2), pp.42~50 (2016)
  19. Koda, K., "Task-induced variability in FL composition : Language-specific perspectives", Foreign Language Annals, 26(3), pp.332~346 (1993)
  20. Kojima, M., "Reliability of lexical richness measures based on word lists in short second language productions", System, 42, pp.23~33 (2014)
  21. 권선희, "Lexical Richness in L2 Writing: How Much Vocabulary Do L2 Learners Need to Use?", 영어교육, 64(3), pp.155~174 (2009), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  22. Kyle, K., "The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 34(4), pp.12~24 (2016)
  23. Laufer, B., "The development of L2 lexis in the expression of the advanced learner", The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), pp.440~448 (1991)
  24. Laufer, B., "The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time?", RELC Journal, 25(2), pp.21~33 (1994)
  25. Laufer, B., "The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?", Applied Linguistics, 19(2), pp.255~271 (1998)
  26. Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use : Lexical richness in L2 written production", Applied Linguistics, 16(3), pp.307~322 (1995)
  27. Laufer, B., "Relationship between passive and active vocabularies : Effects of language learning context", Language Learning, 48(3), pp.365~391 (1998)
  28. Lee, S. H., "ESL learners’ vocabulary use in writing and the effects of explicit vocabulary instruction", System, 31(4), pp.537~561 (2003)
  29. Lee, S. I., "From receptive to productive : Improving ESL learners’ use of vocabulary in a postreading comprehension task", TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), pp.295~320 (2006)
  30. Li, H., "Investigating how vocabulary is assessed in a narrative task through raters’ verbal protocols", System, 46, pp.1~13 (2014)
  31. Li, Y., "Linguistic characteristics of ESL writing in task-based e-mail activities", System, 28(2), pp.229~245 (2000)
  32. Malvern, D., "Evolving Models of Language", pp.58~71 (1997), Multilingual Matters
  33. Malvern, D., "Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity", Language Testing, 19(1), pp.85~104 (2002)
  34. Malvern, D., "Lexical diversity and language development:Quantification and assessment" (2004), Palgrave Macmillan
  35. McCarthy, P. M., "An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity (MTLD)", Dissertation Abstracts International, 66 (2005)
  36. McCarthy, P. M., "vocd : A theoretical and empirical evaluation", Language Testing, 24(4), pp.459~488 (2007)
  37. Meara, P. M., "P_Lex : A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short texts", Prospect, 16(3), pp.5~24 (2001)
  38. Milton, J., "Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition" (2009), Multilingual Matters
  39. Morris, L., "Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of Teaching English as a Second Language trainees", System, 32(1), pp.75~87 (2004)
  40. Muncie, J., "Process writing and vocabulary development : Comparing Lexical Frequency Profiles across drafts", System, 30(2), pp.225~235 (2002)
  41. Nation, P., "Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques" (2008), Heinle
  42. Read, J., "Assessing vocabulary" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  43. Reid, J., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.191~210 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  44. Scott, M., (1998), Oxford University Press
  45. Vermeer, A., "Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data", Language Testing, 17(1), pp.65~83 (2000)
  46. Vongpumivitch, V., "Frequency analysis of the words in the Academic Word List(AWL)and non-AWL content words in applied linguistics research papers", English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), pp.33~41 (2009)
  47. Yu, G., "Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances", Applied Linguistics, 31(2), pp.236~259 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)