The Use of Socrative and Kahoot! in English Grammar
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of the present study was is to investigate the effectiveness of using student response systems (SRS) on grammar learning for college students and their perspectives on the treatment. Seventy-five freshmen enrolled in a required course in the spring semester of 2018 underwent English grammar learning with or without the student response system, Socrative and Kahoot! for one semester. Pre- and post-test structures were conducted, and all the data included in the two surveys were analyzed after the experiment. The results revealed that there were significant differences between the pre- and post-tests in all three groups. Concerning the effects of using SRS, no significant differences were found between the non-SRS group and the two SRS groups in terms of learning grammar. However, a favorable perception of the integration of the student response systems in grammar learning was found according to the qualitative analysis. The perceived advantages and disadvantages of SRS on mobile devices were also discussed. It can be concluded that employing SRS such as Kahoot! and Socrative is effective in improving learners' participation and interests, and it motivates students to learn grammar. Pedagogical implications and future studies will be discussed.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was is to investigate the effectiveness of using student response systems (SRS) on grammar learning for college students and their perspectives on the treatment. Seventy-five freshmen enrolled in a required course in the spring semester of 2018 underwent English grammar learning with or without the student response system, Socrative and Kahoot! for one semester. Pre- and post-test structures were conducted, and all the data included in the two surveys were analyzed after the experiment. The results revealed that there were significant differences between the pre- and post-tests in all three groups. Concerning the effects of using SRS, no significant differences were found between the non-SRS group and the two SRS groups in terms of learning grammar. However, a favorable perception of the integration of the student response systems in grammar learning was found according to the qualitative analysis. The perceived advantages and disadvantages of SRS on mobile devices were also discussed. It can be concluded that employing SRS such as Kahoot! and Socrative is effective in improving learners' participation and interests, and it motivates students to learn grammar. Pedagogical implications and future studies will be discussed.
참고문헌 (45)
- Agbatogun, A. O., "Developing learners’ second language communicative competence through active learning: Clickers or communicative approach?", Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), pp.257~269 (2014)
- Attali, Y., "Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance?", Computers & Education, 83, pp.57~63 (2015)
- Awedh, M., "Using Socrative and smartphones for the support of collaborative learning", International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 3(4), pp.17~24 (2014)
- Becker, H. J., "How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers : Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools", Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(2), pp.274~293 (2000)
- Blasco-Arcas, L., "Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance", Computers & Education, 62(3), pp.102~110 (2013)
- Caldwell, J. E., "Clickers in the large classroom : Current research and beast practice tips", CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), pp.9~20 (2007)
- Cardoso, W., "Learning a foreign language with a learner response system : The students’perspective", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), pp.393~417 (2011)
- 차윤정, "An Alternative Method for Vocabulary Learning Using Quizlet", 영상영어교육, 17(1), pp.117~144 (2016), 영상영어교육학회[DOI]
- 차윤정, "Using a Student Response System (Socrative) as a Pre-Reading Method in an EFL Reading Environment", 영상영어교육, 19(2), pp.95~119 (2018), 영상영어교육학회[DOI]
- Charlier, N., "Game based learning as a vehicle to teach first aid content : A randomized experiment", Journal of School Health, 83(7), pp.493~499 (2013)
- Chien, Y. T., "Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction", Educational Research Review, 17, pp.1~18 (2016)
- Clark, R., "eLearning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning" (2008), Pfeiffer
- Dakka, S. M., "Using Socrative to enhance in-class student engagement and collaboration", International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 4(3), pp.13~19 (2015)
- Dicheva, D., "Gamification in education : A systematic mapping study", Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), pp.75~88 (2015)
- Drexler, W., "The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments : Balancing teacher control and student autonomy", Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), pp.369~385 (2010)
- Egbert, J., "Engaging K-12 language learners in media literacy", TESOL Journal, 6(1), pp.177~187 (2015)
- Freeman, S., "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), pp.8410~8415 (2014)
- Green, A., "Significant returns in engagement and performance with a free teaching app", The Journal of Economic Education, 47(1), pp.1~10 (2016)
- Hariharasudan, A., "A scoping review on digital English and education 4.0 for industry 4.0", Social Sciences, 7(11), pp.227~239 (2018)
- Huang, W. H., "Evaluating learners’ motivational and cognitive processing in an online game-based learning environment", Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), pp.694~704 (2011)
- Hung, H. T., "The integration of a student response system in flipped classrooms", Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), pp.16~27 (2017)
- Hunsu, N. J., "A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems(cliker-based technologies)on cognition and affect", Computers & Education, 94, pp.102~119 (2016)
- "Kahoot!" (2019)[URL]
- Kapp, K., "The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education" (2012), Pfeiffer
- Kaya, A., "Taking advantages of technologies : Using the socrative in English language teaching classes", International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 2(3), pp.4~12 (2016)
- Kessler, G., "The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning", pp.278~292 (2017), Wiley-Blackwell
- 김혜숙, "Effects of using mobile devices in blended learning for English reading comprehension", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 17(2), pp.64~85 (2014), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- 김혜숙, "Effects of Using Socrative on Speaking and Listening Performance of EFL University Students", 영상영어교육, 20(2), pp.109~134 (2019), 영상영어교육학회[DOI]
- Kukulska-Hulme, A., "Mobile pedagogy for English language teaching : A guide for teachers", British Council, ~ (2015)
- Larsen-Freeman, D., "Techniques and principles in language teaching" (2011), Oxford University Press
- Lee, J. S., "Effects of order of placement of grammar lessons on learners in the textbook", Master, Education. Hankuk, pp.2018
- Lin, Y. C., "Implementing clickers to assist learning in science lectures : The clicker-assisted conceptual change model", Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), pp.979~996 (2011)
- McDonough, K., "The impact of individual and shared clicker use on students’collaborative learning", Computers & Education, 86, pp.236~249 (2015)
- McGrail, E., "Teachers, technology, and change : English teachers’ perspectives", Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), pp.5~24 (2005)
- Michos, M., "Gamification in foreign language teaching: Do you Kahoot?", International Scientific Conference on Information Technology and Data Related Research, pp.511~516 (2017)
- O’Malley, J. M., "Learning strategies in second language acquisition" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Pourhossein, G. A., "Role of Iranian EFL teachers about using Pronunciation Power software in the instruction of English pronunciation", English Language Teaching, 7(1), pp.139~148 (2014)
- Pourhossein, G. A., "Advantages of using computer in teaching English pronunciation", International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(3), pp.78~85 (2017)
- Shaban, A. E., "The use of Socrative in ESL classrooms : Towards active learning", Teaching English with Technology, 17(4), pp.64~77 (2017)
- "Socrative" (2019)[URL]
- Stanley, G., "Language learning with technology : Ideas for integrating technology in the classroom" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Sward, K. A., "Use of a web-based game to teach pediatric content to medical students", Ambulatory Pediatrics, 8(6), pp.354~359 (2008)
- Terrion, J. L., "Perceptions of the effects of clicker technology on student learning and engagement : A study of freshmen chemistry students", Research in Learning Technology, 20, pp.1~11 (2012)
- Wang, A. I., "The wear out effect of a game-based student response system", Computers &Education, 82, pp.217~227 (2015)
- 윤서영, "Using Learner Response Systems in EFL Classrooms: Students’ Perspectives and Experience", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 20(2), pp.36~58 (2017), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
