본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Online Machine Translation in L2 Writing

2

조회

0

다운로드

33

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study investigated students’ views on the use of online machine translation (MT) in L2 writing by collecting survey responses from 171 Korean learners of English upon completion of actual writing tasks in the classroom and comparing these responses for different proficiency levels and text genres. The participants first wrote a paragraph without using MT or any other resources and then wrote another paragraph using only Google Translate a week later. The study found that students are generally satisfied with using MT for L2 writing and are also willing to use MT in future writing tasks. More importantly, responses by students in different proficiency levels and text genres showed notable differences. Low proficiency learners had the highest acceptance rate of MT output and showed the highest degree of satisfaction and willingness to use MT for L2 writing. The genre groups also showed differences, as the narrative group was significantly less satisfied with MT use, less likely to accept the MT output, and less willing to use MT in the future than the argumentative group. Based on these findings, we discuss the implications for the use of MT as a pedagogical tool in L2 writing classrooms.

Abstract

This study investigated students’ views on the use of online machine translation (MT) in L2 writing by collecting survey responses from 171 Korean learners of English upon completion of actual writing tasks in the classroom and comparing these responses for different proficiency levels and text genres. The participants first wrote a paragraph without using MT or any other resources and then wrote another paragraph using only Google Translate a week later. The study found that students are generally satisfied with using MT for L2 writing and are also willing to use MT in future writing tasks. More importantly, responses by students in different proficiency levels and text genres showed notable differences. Low proficiency learners had the highest acceptance rate of MT output and showed the highest degree of satisfaction and willingness to use MT for L2 writing. The genre groups also showed differences, as the narrative group was significantly less satisfied with MT use, less likely to accept the MT output, and less willing to use MT in the future than the argumentative group. Based on these findings, we discuss the implications for the use of MT as a pedagogical tool in L2 writing classrooms.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Alderson, J. C., "The cloze procedure and proficiency in English as a foreign language", TESOL Quarterly, 13(2), pp.219~227 (1979)
  2. Alhaisoni, E., "An investigation of Saudi EFL university students’ attitudes towards the use of Google Translate", International Journal of English Language Education, 5(1), pp.72~82 (2017)
  3. Bahri, H., "Google Translate as a supplementary tool for learning Malay : A case study at Universiti Sains Malaysia", Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3), pp.161~167 (2016)
  4. Chen, M. -H., "Developing a corpus-based paraphrase tool to improve EFL learners’ writing skills", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), pp.22~40 (2015)
  5. 정은선, "The Effect of L2 Proficiency on Post-editing Machine Translated Texts", Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(1), pp.182~193 (2020), 아시아테플
  6. Clifford, J., "Surveying the landscape : What is the role of machine translation in language learning", Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, 10, pp.108~121 (2013)
  7. Correa, M., "Leaving the “peer” out of peer-editing: Online translators as a pedagogical tool in the Spanish as a second language classroom", Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 7(1), pp.1~20 (2014)
  8. Creswell, J., "Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches" (2003), SAGE
  9. Ducar. C., "Machine translation and the L2 classroom : Pedagogical solutions for making peace with Google translate", Foreign Language Annals, 51(4), pp.779~795 (2018)
  10. Fotos, S. S., "The cloze test as an integrative measure of EFL proficiency: A substitute for essays on college entrance examinations?", Language Learning, 41(3), pp.313~336 (1991)
  11. Garcia, I., "Machine translation-assisted language learning : Writing for beginners", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), pp.471~487 (2011)
  12. Groves, M., "Friend or foe? Google Translate in language for academic purposes", English for Specific Purposes, 37, pp.112~121 (2015)
  13. 임희주, "교양영어 수업에서 영어자동번역기 사용에 대한 대학생의 인식 및 태도연구 ― 영작문 수업을 중심으로", 교양교육연구, 11(6), pp.727~751 (2017), 한국교양교육학회
  14. Jin, L., "Foreign language learners’ use and perception of online dictionaries : A survey study", MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), pp.513~533 (2013)
  15. "Translation activities in the language classroom" (2009)[URL]
  16. 김나영, "Effects of the Use of Bilingual Dictionary and Machine Translation on EFL Students' English Proficiency", 영어교과교육, 17(1), pp.21~42 (2018), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  17. 김성우, "Playing with Machine Translation in Language Classroom: Affordances and Constraints", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 22(2), pp.9~28 (2019), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
  18. Kol, S., "Google Translate in academic writing courses?", The EUROCALL Review, 26(2), pp.50~57 (2018)
  19. Larson-Guenette, J., "It’s just reflex now : German language learners’ use of online resources", Die Unterrichtspraxis, 2013, pp.46(1), 62~74
  20. Lee, S., "Cloze test as a measure of EFL writing proficiency", English Teaching, 52(3), pp.151~172 (1997)
  21. 이상민, "L2 작문 수정에 미친 기계번역의 효과성에 대한 한국 대학생 학습자의 인식", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 22(4), pp.206~225 (2019), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
  22. Lee, S. -M., "The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), pp.157~175 (2020)
  23. Niño, A., "Evaluating the use of machine translation post-editing in the foreign language class", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), pp.29~49 (2008)
  24. Niño, A., "Machine translation in foreign language learning : Language learners’ and tutors’ perceptions of its advantages and disadvantages", ReCALL, 21(2), pp.241~258 (2009)
  25. O’Neill, E. M., "The effect of online translators on L2 writing in French", Doctor, pp.2012
  26. O’Neill, E. M., "Measuring the impact of online translation on FL writing scores", The IALLT Journal, 46(2), pp.1~39 (2016)
  27. Tsai, S-C., "Using google translate in EFL drafts: A preliminary investigation", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), pp.510~526 (2019)
  28. Williams, L., "Web-based machine translation as a tool for promoting electronic literacy and language awareness", Foreign Language Annals, 39(4), pp.565~578 (2006)
  29. Yoon, H. -J., "The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres", TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), pp.275~301 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)